Allocation of PIC vs pax hours in group flying
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and the non-insured pilot
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cilboldentune, Britannia
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sorry but if I've put a considerable amount of money and time into a group I would be highly annoyed if I found another group member was letting one of their mates fly the plane on the cheap. There are always people trying to get something for nothing. When it comes right down to it you know in your heart of hearts its not really legit that a pax should be able to book PIC.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only problem I see is if (after a serious incident) the logbooks are looked at
However, there is a practical problem with all this, and that is if somebody gets injured. People then change, and if somebody can drop you in the s*** and get a better insurance payout, they generally will. But this thread was about legality.
I was always given the example of the Graham Hill crash where the insurers failed to pay out.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd be interested to see if they pay out on the Colin Montgomery crash given that his licence appears to have expired
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another issue could be post flight examination of the plane and group member logbook in case of "undetected" incident. Let's admit that the flight went fine, but you busted a military zone or controlled airpsace.
CAA will find the name of the group member in the plane logbook, but no entry in his logbook. Is that person ready to take over that responsibility ?
CAA will find the name of the group member in the plane logbook, but no entry in his logbook. Is that person ready to take over that responsibility ?