Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

new website for submitting problems with GPS

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

new website for submitting problems with GPS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jun 2008, 10:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
new website for submitting problems with GPS

We've set a new website for reporting any problems with GPS:

nano - Report navigation anomalies and help make flying safer

The aim is to get problems into the open so they can be resolved.

It is sponsored by the CAA but you can report anonymously.

We are an independent consultancy and are funded by the CAA to investigate problems and get them resolved (eg report database errors to the publishers).

Please use it so that it can help!
Nick

Helios - Helios - Home
nickmc is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2008, 11:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Daventry UK
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just wondering if your funding extends to investigating problems with VOR, DME, ADF, etc.? Or is it just GPS?
david viewing is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2008, 15:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree with DW above - this is just another banal attempt to have a go at GPS.

You can make any GPS go wrong if use use a rubbish aerial.

They should have a website detailing dangerous NDB approaches, where the radiation pattern is bent through 30 degrees at about 4D, due to terrain, water, whatever.
IO540 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2008, 12:05
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry it's only GPS but it really isn't an attempt to bash GPS! Just the opposite it's meant to help!

Problems with GPS aren't only due to installation - what about database errors, interference problems.

Thisis the first time a central reporting facility has been set up but if it works maybe it can be extended to other areas. Even if not, it makes a lot of sense to report GPS problems centrally because its coverage is national (well global of course!)

Nick
nickmc is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2008, 18:51
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nickmc can you get problems created by the CAA resolved as well? Absolutely magic if you could get them into 21st century (or even 20th century would be a help)
WorkingHard is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2008, 19:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I got very involved with the CAA GPS trials last year for I really thought that we had a chance of entering the 21st century. I even took a CAA chap who was involved in the trials flying with me.

So what has been the result?

My local airfield (which was one of the six airfields involved in the trial) has apparently got no interest in having an approved GPS letdown procedure.

Why do you think that is?

I believe it is because the CAA have demanded that they pay for a safety review to approve the very same procedures that we used during the trial using charts prepared by the CAA!

Have any of the GPS procedures at any of the six airfields been approved?

This all appears to be a question of funding. I wish someone would sort out this mess for I would much rather do a GPS letdown than follow the approved NDB procedure (and let me tell you, I have done thousands of NDBs during the last 50 years all over the world).
JW411 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2008, 19:33
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If funding is the problem, and it certainly appears to be so after all this time, then these approaches are never likely to arrive because none of those airfields are likely to recover the survey cost from extra traffic.

IMCR training is nearly dead now (due to the uncertainty); JAA IR training is largely based on 1960s navaids, you need mandatory ATC for any instrument approach anyway, so what is the point in anybody paying for it?

Especially as anybody half smart can (and does) fly the NDB approach using GPS.

Very sad.
IO540 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2008, 23:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why should survey cost be an issue?

Why not "do what everyone does" and "overlay" the already surveyed NDB procedure using GPS , except do it officially?
flybymike is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 01:47
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps the UKCAA should ask the FAA for a little help in approving GPS approaches.
As I recall at last count, the FAA has test flown and approved over 900 GPS approaches in the USA...and yes, my private airplane is equipped with an IFR approved GPS unit, and it has worked to perfection, for over nine years.
No 'glitches' whatsoever....none, nada, zip.
411A is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 06:20
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is why.

Hi Flybymike,

Why not "do what everyone does" and "overlay" the already surveyed NDB procedure using GPS , except do it officially?
Because then the CAA wouldn't make any money out of it.

Broomstick.
BroomstickPilot is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 06:32
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the CAA is really bent on making the reported 5 digits from every GPS approach, then we can forget them in the UK, for GA accessible airfields.

For ever.
IO540 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 07:08
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
411,

I think you will find it is over 900 LPV approaches (i.e. ILS type approaches without the need for ground infrastructure) and thousands of LNAV or overlay approaches in the FAA land.

With such a limited deployment and such short history in use (only a few % of the existence of the British Empire) it is not surprising that the CAA is concerned about safety and proceeding cautiously with this novel new technology
mm_flynn is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 09:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Island of Aphrodite
Age: 75
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And it is not only FAA land. Canada Australia and and NZ have had GPS approaches for some time. Last year with great fanfare when our beloved CAA approved 6 airfilds for GPS approaches they joined France Germany and even Hungary in Europe who have had GPS approaches for some time. In Germany the airfield does not have to be licenced. The only requirement is a AWOS typoe of weather reporting.

While the CAA is populated by people whose only knowledge of aviation is the Club/Business cabin of the airliner they travel around to endless meetings, we do not have a chance.
beerdrinker is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2012, 13:31
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: South West - uk
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi, does anyone know what happened to this

website for reporting any problems with GPS?

nano - Report navigation anomalies and help make flying safer

The aim was to get problems into the open so they can be resolved.

It was sponsored by the CAA but you can report anonymously.


TIA

Last edited by wc33; 4th Jan 2012 at 13:33. Reason: not linked
wc33 is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2012, 13:43
  #15 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably they realised that it was a waste of time and money and that as the US has been using GPS (I was flying GPS approaches when I did my IR in 2001) then there is tons of data out there....
englishal is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.