Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Shoreham Closed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Sep 2007, 17:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shoreham - Owners in trouble?

Recent reports in the press suggest that Erinaceous, the company which operates Shoreham airport, are in difficulties. Wonder what the outcome will be....
Crashed&Burned is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2007, 18:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Much depends on what the lease says about insolvency of the tenant. I believe the local authority still owns the freehold of the site, and they want to keep it as an airport.

Normally, anybody purchasing the assets from insolvency would be bound by the restrictions on the original lease.

Shoreham closing would be a disaster for the private piots based there because there would be nowhere else to go. Lydd is great but is a 2hrs' drive, Goodwood is no good (too tight), and that's about it south of London. The aerobatic owners could disperse to farm strips around Sussex OK. Closure would mean the end of training within a huge area; the schools have nowhere else to go.

However, Erinaceous is a long way from actually going bust.
IO540 is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2007, 18:47
  #3 (permalink)  
niknak
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IO540

In reallity Erinacious are in very deep and very serious financial do do and I wouldn't be suprised if their creditors pulled the rug this week, in the grand scheme of things, they owe £millions and have few assets.

Because of the somewhat "relaxed" approach of the two main directors to previous dealings, it is to be hoped that they didn't buy the freehold at Shoreham.
If they did, the airport is doomed to being sold to the highest bidder, and that's the end of aviation and the start of a housing development on the site.

Given the company's directors record, one has to ask if the previous owners did carry out the proper due dilligance to ensure that the airport would never become a housing estate.

Even if they still own the leasehold, there will be a strong argument for selling the site for the best price , to give all the money, which the ratepayers have paid in the past to prop up a loss making facility, to a more worthwhile benefit to the community.
niknak is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2007, 19:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't forget they have a bit of involvement with Fairoaks too....
smarthawke is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2007, 20:41
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The existing leasehold was granted on the basis that the site would remain an airport for the next 35 years. I heard it on good authority that there is no intention to change that basis in future lease agreements.
JBGA is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2007, 06:48
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another thing is that the aviation businesses based there have leases which give them the right to carry on being there. IMHO the airport can't just be closed on a whim.

But 10-20 years down the road, anything could happen. A major factor in planning is the "fait accompli" principle You are restricted by a planning restriction from developing for property. So.... you run the place down, make it an unviable business, and eventually the planning restriction will be removed because nobody wants an eyesore. OTOH everybody knows about this old trick...

GA (excluding the farm strip scene) will die out in the UK within 20 years through the lack of airfields, IMHO, unless there is a change in planning policy to enable the development of a small new airfield in the open countryside.
IO540 is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2007, 07:59
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as can be seen, Erinaceous' main interest is money. The recent ruling that even go rounds are charged as touch and goes suggests that aviation and even flight safety are not uppermost in their mind.
Crashed&Burned is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2007, 11:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While I know nothing about the company involved, a low approach and go around (as a planned maneuver) takes pretty much the same airport resource as a T&G so I don't think it is any more unreasonable to charge this than a T&G. IIRC there was a rant thread on this and the conclusion was that an ATC initiated Go around or a non-training one (i.e. a real safety issue) were not being charged.
mm_flynn is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2007, 12:56
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's not the way I understand it. If you are right, no probs.
Crashed&Burned is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2008, 12:24
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near the Mountains of Sussex
Posts: 270
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Shoreham Closed

Currently the airfield is closed for all movements.......... the company which operates it has gone into administration.

http://www.erinaceousir.com/erinaceo...0521nRNSN2676S
Blink182 is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2008, 12:43
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The front end and about 50ft up
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Just heard the news but saw it coming some time ago. As someone who regularly uses Shoreham this is very bad news, and is largely a result of mismanagement by the dodgy outfit that has been running the airport. I sincerely hope it doesn't turn into another retail park or housing estate but that seems to be what everyone other than local pilots wants.

With movements ceased you can bet that many of the companies based there will go under and then the spiral dive towards 'brownfield eco-village' is fully developed.

Perhaps Erinacious should be renamed Avaricious. W@nkers.
Fg Off Max Stout is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2008, 12:57
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London UK
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those clowns also 'own' Fairoaks where I am learning to fly. One last exam to do and near to my solo nav - this news is making me anxious. Hope this has a good outcome for GA and not the local housing association.
grat is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2008, 13:13
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: .
Age: 37
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very bad news. I sincerely hope that Shoreham will be saved and remain an airfield.
Captain Smithy is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2008, 13:15
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Garden of England
Age: 85
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shattering news, but maybe the behind-the-scenes activity that I believe is in progress will succeed in maintaining flying at this historic airport.

I have a modest vested interest, a flying lesson booked for later this month!
603DX is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2008, 13:53
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is very sad news

I am currently nearing the end of my PPL training at Shoreham airport with a really nice flying club and it would be really upsetting for it to all to come to an end. Shoreham Airport is such a unique place and I'm sure many people would be dismayed if it were to close.
callum91 is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2008, 14:00
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing like the usual panic mongering. The administrators have been called into the company that operates it. It is a bit early for all the crying and wailing. Give the administrators a few days to get there feet under the table and work out what needs to be done.
S-Works is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2008, 14:00
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard the Airport Manager has applied for a licence at the CAA for the airfield to operate under a shell company (which was agreed with the administrators). He's hoping to get things in the air again within hours.
2604 is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2008, 14:04
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shoreham has a great atmosphere not just for pilots but for all the other visitors who enjoy watching the aircraft. I really hope that something can be done to save it from turning into a housing estate - it is the oldest licensed airfield after all.

Our PA-28 is sitting on the ground today at Shoreham not able to get out! Not sure what happens next!
Sandown235 is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2008, 14:09
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Under the clag EGKA
Posts: 1,026
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What are the rules re departing in these circumstances? Presumably one can just go while using due caution.
effortless is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2008, 14:39
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sussex
Age: 48
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not suggesting that this might be the future for EGKA, however what is interesting is the number for 'ex airfields' the government approved for their spun 'Eco Towns'. Looking at that short list the otherday most are or have been airfields, in the southeast Dunsfold and Ford both targeted, Tangmere has already been well built around. GA seems to be very unlucky of late.
Monkeeeey is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.