Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

PA28 Fuel management

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

PA28 Fuel management

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 16:11
  #41 (permalink)  
Pompey till I die
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Guildford
Age: 51
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Welcome baclk

OK the 20 billion dollar question, why doesn't a PA-28 have the option to select both?
Nope, that would be where on earth has G-Emma been for several months ?
PompeyPaul is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 17:52
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I only post on PPrune whilst sat here revising for exams.. had a break for a while now started on Nav the last PPL exam for me other than the RT practical!!!. It makes a nice change from getting annoyed with trying to get the right answer from the devils wheel.
Does that mean that your current series of postings is going to be the last ever, assuming you pass the upcoming exam? That would be a shame!

Good luck with the nav exam though.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 18:13
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
most GA gauges measure [i]volume[/] but fuel consumption is by weight
That is an interesting point.

For a liquid, the two are practically the same. Avgas expands only 0.1% per degC. The biggest change one is likely to see (GA) is say +35C on the ground, down to -25C at FL200. That is a volume shrinkage of 6% - too little to see even on an accurate fuel gauge.

I believe you can see this on a flowmeter though. The standard Floscan 201 turbine flowmeter used with nearly all fuel totalisers in GA measures volume flow, I believe. So at the above FL200 example, the fuel mass flow will be underestimated (i.e. the error is on the dangerous side) by 6% but does this matter? You are still working in volume units; well I am - in USG.

If however your flowmeter was set to read lb or kg then you would have a real error because at low fuel temperature the flowmeter is under-reading because the fuel is heavier. This means the "FOB at destination" projection (from the standard flowmeter-GPS functionality) will be optimistic - if the flowmeter is set to read lb or kg.

Interesting!

Not that one should sail quite so close to the wind for this to matter...
IO540 is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2008, 18:04
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the mist
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some of the few things I've learn't about GA fuel planning when flying the likes of a PA28 on a longish cross country.

Plan your fuel based on time and don't get too smart calculating it to the litre using miles per gallon or gps functions. Don't assume you'll be flying in a direct line to your destination either!

Look at the weather and look at alternative airfields and consider how much fuel it'll take to get there from your destination. Don't just say, use your usual 45 mins reserve all the time (fine for your back yard local flying).

Keep the ball in the middle and change tank every half hour or so first checking for suitable fields and turning the electric pump on before messing about with the selector.

Never think "it's ok, I've got lots of fuel".... Especially when you're lost!

Don't smoke at the pumps.

Don't run with scissors.

Stay in school.

Do as your mummy said.
TheGorrilla is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2008, 18:10
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't smoke at the pumps.
How did you learn that one?
IO540 is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2008, 11:50
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The outfit I did PPL with had a PA28 checklist (which I use to this day) that instructs to start engine on the fullest tank, then change tanks for the power check, take-off and the first 30 minutes of flight.
I too was taught to start up on one tank then change tank before power checks, but I always start up on the lowest and take off on the fullest tank. I don't think its the smartest thing to take off on the lowest tank as implied above.
Mungo Man is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2008, 15:15
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back on my time on the PA28 I was taught to start on the RIGHT Tank then switch to the LEFT during taxi / checks.

Sole reason being in the event of an EFATO, the action of moving the fuel tank selector from LEFT to OFF is easier than RIGHT to OFF.

Always think worst case
tp555 is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2008, 15:39
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sole reason being in the event of an EFATO, the action of moving the fuel tank selector from LEFT to OFF is easier than RIGHT to OFF.
I can't see that! There is **** all difference!

dp
dublinpilot is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2008, 15:41
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Make life as easy as you possibly can for yourself before something goes wrong. 6P's and all that.

Just an airmanship thing I do, only a suggestion.
tp555 is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2008, 19:49
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sole reason being in the event of an EFATO, the action of moving the fuel tank selector from LEFT to OFF is easier than RIGHT to OFF
I would rather concentrate on doing a half decent landing in an EFATO. Turning off the fuel cock will do no good if the wing tank is ruptured, and if the plane is undamaged then it doesn't matter anyway.

It is only for the specific (and I suggest very rare) case of both wings undamaged but the engine fuel hoses damaged that turning off the fuel cock is relevant.
IO540 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2008, 18:03
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UTUXA
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AT MSF(Manch) we were taught your method Mungo Man.Take off on the full one.
crispey is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2008, 19:22
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North of CDG
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with the above comment re. taking off on the fullest tank. Let me elaborate; the outfit which checklist I refer to had our PA28s fully refuelled between each and every flight, so we always had full tanks on start-up anyway (AVGAS is cheaper Stateside ).

Cheers
FougaMagister is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2008, 12:58
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NSW Australia
Age: 59
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking PA 28 Fuel Mgt

I always do fuel planning for our Archer II at 40l/hr (giving 264 mins endrnc) and lean out in flight. Our motor has 50 hrs to run before replacement and on a 3 hr flight came back at 33.5l/hr burn rate. So better to plan at upper rate.

Another thing I was taught was to take off and land on the left tank so if you had to change tanks quickly it is easier in the PA 28 from the left hand tank, whether shutting off or changing to RH.

I agree with IO540 I'd rather walk away from a landing not having shut down properly than stuff up completely. Remeber every landing you walk away from is a good one.

Cheers
ArcherCol is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.