Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Flexwing or Three Axis?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Flexwing or Three Axis?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jan 2008, 08:52
  #1 (permalink)  
ENTREPPRUNEUR
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The 60s
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flexwing or Three Axis?

I went along to the local microlight club and was rather surprised that the guy there was giving me strong advice against flexwing vs three axis. He'd apparently had a long history with flexwing but now seemed to have seen the light. They have both types at this club.

His objections to flexwings include:
- they are hard work in anything but smooth air
- they can't easily be manipulated on the ground in windy conditions
- they can't be left outside because they'll get blown over

My desire to try flexwing stems from wanting cheap flying. If three-axis is just as cheap then is there still a case for flexwings?
twistedenginestarter is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2008, 09:38
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flex or three

If it's a microlight, it doesn't matter whether it's a flex wing or a three axis, if it's windy both can suffer the same fate.

Microlighters tend to keep a good eye on the limits, ours are considerably lower than the general GA limits. However experience can increase the "window" and microlighters can be found out in all sorts.

Depends what you want. Flex is great fun, but then so is three axis.

Personal choice at to what makes you smile, but I wouldn't say that one is cheaper, or safer.

However you can't beat looking straight over the side of your hull in a flex!
Watnochute is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2008, 09:43
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,826
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
The problem I see with flying both types is the fact that control inputs are reversed. People say 'you get used to it' but in an emergency situation eg EFATO instincts take over; it's already killed several experienced people including instructors. eg Long Marston about
'91-ish; experienced 3-axis instructor in a flex wing; engine failed on climbout; he pushed forward instead of pulling back and it stalled in and killed both of them.
chevvron is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2008, 10:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 747
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was the guy an instructor? talk to somebody else you may get the opposite view, each to there own,

I have owned a flexwing for around 3 years now its an older 2 stroke 2nd generation type and I love it but it can be frustrating at times,

The up to date ones are a different kettle of fish, but yes they can be a handful on the ground if its windy, my limit to rig up is around 12mph, and taxi 20mph but I am newish to the sport,

Have a trail flight in one and a chat with the instructor,

The school that is based at the field where I fly has both flex/fixed.

http://www.wlms.co.uk/

Nick.
magpienja is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2008, 11:16
  #5 (permalink)  
Oh Shazbat!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Leeds, UK
Age: 64
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flex or Three...

I must confess that the flex boys do seem to have more fun. Also the young ladies seem to think the flex wing boys are more daring.

When it comes to learning, I started lessons at the same time as another club member, me on 3-axis and him on flex. Weather impacted us both, as Watnochute says, but I ended up at double the number of hours flying even though he had more free time than I did. In autumn last year he switched to 3-axis to get the time in.

If you can get someone warm, sunny & with pretty low winds then I'd say flex-wing, but here in the UK with the weather then 3-axis first will give you a faster start.
batninth is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2008, 17:49
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did 2 hours in a flex wing last year and I can't imagine bringing that up to 3 this year. It was fun but everything seeming the wrong way round, as mentioned by chevron, can be a genuine headache. If you look at http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...ight=flex+wing , though, the advice at Srl 15 is very good. It still doesn't guard against possible disaster on the ground. The nosewheel steering is via, effectively, foot operated handle bars; push right sends you left and left sends you right. Personally I'm not sure that 30 odd years of instinctively pushing the other way won't click in should life suddenly get interesting. Visualise a sudden veer left towards a fence and having to fight the natural reflex to push the right foot.

I must confess to the possibility of old dog, new tricks.
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2008, 07:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: london
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3 axis

and remember that although flex wings are great fun they are still not allowed "in" at many airfields.
micromalc is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2008, 09:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Strathaven Airfield
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the end of your day, it is what gives you a lift!

You can't park many light aircraft outside - ie Piper Cub, Tiger Moth, Condor - because they are wood and fabric.

You can park weightshifts outside, you just have to pop the wing off. But usually, while you can buy an airworthy weightshift for 1500, if you have a 10k to 25k aircraft, you want it parked inside.

Motorbikes have different controls from cars - you even turn the opposite way with the handlebars! - and people don't have too much trouble.

I could go on, many have already.

It is horses for courses - and ironically, the first two microlights to be flown around the world were weightshifts!

XA
xrayalpha is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2008, 15:24
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Norfolk U.K.
Age: 68
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are cheap fixed wing microlights - the Thruster & MW series for instance. But although they would be easier to fly in bumpy conditions the Thruster, in particular, being a brake-less tail dragger would be no better off than a flexwing on the ground. The main advantage of flexwings is the ability to quickly remove the wing, and with a bit more time fully de-rig it. This can greatly reduce hangarage requirements. Many folk trailer them home and store in the garage.
The Flying Pram is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2008, 16:58
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Sussex, England
Posts: 487
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you're located near Sussex or Hampshire there are here at least a couple of e-mail microlight flying groups whose membership has both 3 axis & flex flyers. We do meet informally monthly at pubs & folk don't compete, each finds fun and economy.
Try & find similar e-mail groups if you can and though as an oldie I fly a Rans S4 single seat 'plane which is amazingly useable, the flex flyers tell me their's are as exciting as motorcycling with full hands on control.
Try flex for the reasons others have given as it's said not to be so difficult to convert later on. A Rans may cost say £3k but then you do need 29ft wide hangarage which isn't always readily found.

Mike.

Last edited by mikehallam; 28th Jan 2008 at 22:48.
mikehallam is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 08:23
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oxford
Age: 45
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wot they say about control reversal.

flexwings are brilliant fun, but having got used to SEPs now, the control reversal just terrifies me. I'd like a three-axis with the power-to-weight and physical exposure of a flexwing, please!
michaelthewannabe is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2012, 22:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sandy
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would say do a trial lesson (or two) in each type and go with what you feel happiest flying.

I started out on flexwing, but went over to 3 axis (and had to put up with some lighthearted abuse from the flexwing pilots for flying a 'girlie plane').

The way I considered it was that at our airfield, the 3 axis planes weren't as popular, so I was more likely to be able to get a lesson or two in when I wanted, and due to their better tolerence of weather conditions I could go and fly when the flexwings were grounded. The other reason is that as the controls are similar to GA, it would be an easier transition to flying something bigger when time and money allowed.

In the meantime, if I fancied a bit of open air, I could just ask a flexwing flying friend to take me for a bimble!
ChayD is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2012, 22:46
  #13 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,232
Received 51 Likes on 27 Posts
Ye gods Chay, that's a serious bit of thread necromancy.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.