SET and MET class ratings
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SET and MET class ratings
i was getting some info from my licence yesterday and happened to notice the existence of SET (single engine turbine) and MET (multi) class ratings in the abbreviations section.
never heard of these before, i thought planes of those types would require a type rating (eg king air)... anyone know what they're for?
perhaps its for turboprops or for the ex-military jets some people operate -jet prov / hunter etc.
ta.
never heard of these before, i thought planes of those types would require a type rating (eg king air)... anyone know what they're for?
perhaps its for turboprops or for the ex-military jets some people operate -jet prov / hunter etc.
ta.
Blah Blah Blah
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Malmesbury VRP
Age: 49
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SET and MET are class ratings the same as SEP and MEP.
A rating for say a King Air is a "Type rating"
Having a class rating does not mean you are rated to fly type.
Prime example and ATPL rated pilot who has a type rating for a Dash 8 cannot fly a SAAB 340 without a SAAB 340 type rating.
A rating for say a King Air is a "Type rating"
Having a class rating does not mean you are rated to fly type.
Prime example and ATPL rated pilot who has a type rating for a Dash 8 cannot fly a SAAB 340 without a SAAB 340 type rating.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As I understand you do not require a Class rating to get a type rating, you just get a type rating.
There are some turbine aicraft that just require a Class rating rather than a type rating. I seem to recall the Cessna caravan as such an example.
There are some turbine aicraft that just require a Class rating rather than a type rating. I seem to recall the Cessna caravan as such an example.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just get an FAA ticket, then you can fly SET and MET below aeroplanes below 12501 lbs without a type rating (E.g. King Air 200 which is 12500 lbs)......but your ticket must be standalone, a piggyback one doesn't count.
As to whether this privilege carrys across to G registered aeroplanes (as it does for the SEP and MEP) I am not sure. I *think* that for private privileges it does.
As to whether this privilege carrys across to G registered aeroplanes (as it does for the SEP and MEP) I am not sure. I *think* that for private privileges it does.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks for the replies.
yes - i guess the turbine caravan is a likely contender, as i'm pretty sure theres no type rating for it, but you presumably cant fly it on a SEP rating (there being no pistons in the engine!)
and the turbine islander needs the MET class rating then?
also - the piper malibu (the piston one, not the turboprop) has its own rating of some description doesnt it? cant be flow on a SEP if i recall...
i'm not a spotter - honest!!!
yes - i guess the turbine caravan is a likely contender, as i'm pretty sure theres no type rating for it, but you presumably cant fly it on a SEP rating (there being no pistons in the engine!)
and the turbine islander needs the MET class rating then?
also - the piper malibu (the piston one, not the turboprop) has its own rating of some description doesnt it? cant be flow on a SEP if i recall...
i'm not a spotter - honest!!!
and the turbine islander needs the MET class rating then?
JAR–FCL 1.215 Class ratings (A)
(a) Divisions. Class ratings shall be established for single-pilot aeroplanes not requiring a type rating as follows:
(1) all single-engine piston aeroplanes (land);
(2) all single-engine piston aeroplanes (sea);
(3) all touring motor gliders;
(4) each manufacturer of single engine turbo-prop aeroplanes (land);
(5) each manufacturer of single engine turbo-prop aeroplanes (sea);
(6) all multi-engine piston aeroplanes (land); and
(7) all multi-engine piston aeroplanes (sea).
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Age: 52
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks for the replies.
yes - i guess the turbine caravan is a likely contender, as i'm pretty sure theres no type rating for it, but you presumably cant fly it on a SEP rating (there being no pistons in the engine!)
and the turbine islander needs the MET class rating then?
also - the piper malibu (the piston one, not the turboprop) has its own rating of some description doesnt it? cant be flow on a SEP if i recall...
i'm not a spotter - honest!!!
yes - i guess the turbine caravan is a likely contender, as i'm pretty sure theres no type rating for it, but you presumably cant fly it on a SEP rating (there being no pistons in the engine!)
and the turbine islander needs the MET class rating then?
also - the piper malibu (the piston one, not the turboprop) has its own rating of some description doesnt it? cant be flow on a SEP if i recall...
i'm not a spotter - honest!!!
There is a type rating for a BN2T Turbine Islander.
Finally, as you say, quite peculiarly the PA46 (Piston Malibu) requires a type rating in Europe although God alone knows why. You could fly an ´N´ reg PA46 on your FAA licence with NO type rating provided you had been signed off for retratable gear, high performance, pressurisation etc.
I'm not a spotter either