Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

SET and MET class ratings

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

SET and MET class ratings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jan 2008, 12:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SET and MET class ratings

i was getting some info from my licence yesterday and happened to notice the existence of SET (single engine turbine) and MET (multi) class ratings in the abbreviations section.

never heard of these before, i thought planes of those types would require a type rating (eg king air)... anyone know what they're for?

perhaps its for turboprops or for the ex-military jets some people operate -jet prov / hunter etc.

ta.
outside_loop is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 13:45
  #2 (permalink)  
Blah Blah Blah
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Malmesbury VRP
Age: 49
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SET and MET are class ratings the same as SEP and MEP.

A rating for say a King Air is a "Type rating"

Having a class rating does not mean you are rated to fly type.

Prime example and ATPL rated pilot who has a type rating for a Dash 8 cannot fly a SAAB 340 without a SAAB 340 type rating.
gcolyer is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 14:37
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think what outside_loop meant was: are there any single or multi turbine aircraft out there that do not require an individual type rating?
BackPacker is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 14:59
  #4 (permalink)  
Blah Blah Blah
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Malmesbury VRP
Age: 49
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Either way you still must have the class rating in order to add the type rating.
gcolyer is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 15:05
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I understand you do not require a Class rating to get a type rating, you just get a type rating.

There are some turbine aicraft that just require a Class rating rather than a type rating. I seem to recall the Cessna caravan as such an example.
S-Works is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 15:29
  #6 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just get an FAA ticket, then you can fly SET and MET below aeroplanes below 12501 lbs without a type rating (E.g. King Air 200 which is 12500 lbs)......but your ticket must be standalone, a piggyback one doesn't count.

As to whether this privilege carrys across to G registered aeroplanes (as it does for the SEP and MEP) I am not sure. I *think* that for private privileges it does.
englishal is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 16:06
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for the replies.

yes - i guess the turbine caravan is a likely contender, as i'm pretty sure theres no type rating for it, but you presumably cant fly it on a SEP rating (there being no pistons in the engine!)

and the turbine islander needs the MET class rating then?

also - the piper malibu (the piston one, not the turboprop) has its own rating of some description doesnt it? cant be flow on a SEP if i recall...

i'm not a spotter - honest!!!
outside_loop is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2008, 19:45
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
and the turbine islander needs the MET class rating then?
No there is no such thing as a Multi Engine Turbine Class in Europe, all M/E Turbines are Type rated.

JAR–FCL 1.215 Class ratings (A)
(a) Divisions. Class ratings shall be established for single-pilot aeroplanes not requiring a type rating as follows:
(1) all single-engine piston aeroplanes (land);
(2) all single-engine piston aeroplanes (sea);
(3) all touring motor gliders;
(4) each manufacturer of single engine turbo-prop aeroplanes (land);
(5) each manufacturer of single engine turbo-prop aeroplanes (sea);
(6) all multi-engine piston aeroplanes (land); and
(7) all multi-engine piston aeroplanes (sea).
Whopity is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2008, 12:16
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks whopity, that settles it then!
outside_loop is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2008, 07:42
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Age: 52
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for the replies.

yes - i guess the turbine caravan is a likely contender, as i'm pretty sure theres no type rating for it, but you presumably cant fly it on a SEP rating (there being no pistons in the engine!)

and the turbine islander needs the MET class rating then?

also - the piper malibu (the piston one, not the turboprop) has its own rating of some description doesnt it? cant be flow on a SEP if i recall...

i'm not a spotter - honest!!!
To fly a Caravan (if I recall correctly) you need a Cessna SET class rating which would cover the Caravan and also possibly the Cessna 206 with the Solloy turbine conversion.

There is a type rating for a BN2T Turbine Islander.

Finally, as you say, quite peculiarly the PA46 (Piston Malibu) requires a type rating in Europe although God alone knows why. You could fly an ´N´ reg PA46 on your FAA licence with NO type rating provided you had been signed off for retratable gear, high performance, pressurisation etc.

I'm not a spotter either
julian_storey is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.