Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

logging tailwheel hours

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

logging tailwheel hours

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th January 2008 | 08:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 1
From: Here
Question logging tailwheel hours

A friend has a tailwheel, and has asked if I want to do some flying.

I hold ppl A, but have no tailwheel endorsement - am I allowed to log the hours?

Sam.

Last edited by Sam Rutherford; 12th January 2008 at 08:18. Reason: to get email notification of any responses!
Sam Rutherford is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 09:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 0
From: South Norfolk, England
Yes ... but in what capacity would you log them if you did?

You could log P u/t but not P1 as you can't fly solo ... but wait You could agree prior to the flight to fly a portion of it in command which I think you could log P1, but then take off and and landing would have to be Pu/t ..... errr, I guess? Only one of you can log P1 and P2 is for the "big boys" with multi crew. I think a qualified pilot can log Pu/t with a non FI PPL, but a student can't.

Confusing innit?
shortstripper is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 10:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
From: Amsterdam
Confusing innit?
No, don't think so. A tailwheel is identified as an aircraft variant that requires differences training and sign-off by a qualified instructor. Until that time you cannot act as PIC on such an aircraft, not even just in the air (with your buddy acting as PIC for take-off and landing).

If your buddy is a tailwheel FI (or CRI, possibly?), then you can log Pu/t while he logs P1. Otherwise, I fear your logbook has to stay empty.

I've been in the exact same situation where a friend (who has a tailwheel endorsement) asked me to go for a ride in a Cup a month or two ago. Very interesting, loads of fun, but I've got nothing to show for it in my logbook.
BackPacker is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 11:59
  #4 (permalink)  

Life's too short for ironing
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
From: Scotland, & Maryland, USA
Backpacker,

You went flying in a "Cup" ? Was it attached to a flying saucer????

Sorry, could'nt resist it....
fernytickles is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 14:38
  #5 (permalink)  

Why do it if it's not fun?
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,782
Likes: 12
From: Bournemouth
Agree with BackPacker 100%. You're not qualified to fly the aircraft, so unless your friend is qualified to instruct you on the aircraft, you can't log the time.

However, if you want to keep a record of your flight, LASORS allows you to record it in your logbook. Your capacity for the flight should be recorded as "SNY" (supernumary), and the hours must not be added to your totals.

Enjoy it!

FFF
------------
FlyingForFun is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 14:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
From: Amsterdam
Oh, man. The first spelling mistake I've made in months, and somebody notices...

Anyway, it was a Piper J3C Cub, PH-GEN. No saucers attached. I think it's actually fully original without any electrics (except a semi-portable radio on a battery), but it does have a tailwheel instead of a skid. (It's based at a field with tarmac, so I guess that makes sense.)

I now know what "adverse yaw" is...
BackPacker is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 16:59
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,626
Likes: 12
From: UK
LASORS allows you to record it in your logbook.
Log books are maintained in accordance with Article 35 of the ANO not LASORs which is only a guidance document. Its your logbook and as such you can do what you like with it so long as you comply with Art 35. Fully agree with Backpacker.
Whopity is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 18:01
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver Island
All this talk about rules and regulations excites me, and makes me proud to be a member of a group who end up so paranoid they lose track of the simple fact tail wheel airplanes were the norm at one time....

Then came the nose wheel machines and the maintenance companies got a real boost in business with lots of bent fire walls to repair..

Last edited by Chuck Ellsworth; 12th January 2008 at 18:14.
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 18:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 2
From: UK
Chuck - spot on. Don't forget the shock-loaded engines and wrecked props.
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 18:57
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver Island
Don't forget the shock-loaded engines and wrecked props.

That is only a problem at airports where they don't wear Hi Vis vests Shaggy...
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 19:05
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
From: Not a million miles from EGTF
>>>All this talk about rules and regulations excites me, and makes me proud to be a member of a group who end up so paranoid they lose track of the simple fact tail wheel airplanes were the norm at one time....<<<<


Chuck

Very true, but as someone running a tailwheel group, I've been appalled at the lack of basic landing skill of nose-wheel trained pilots.

One has taken over 25 hours to be sent solo and another 15 hours and even now they still fail to make a decent round-out and touchdown.

I'm not paranoid, and let a lot of basic mistakes go, on the assumption that this is a way of them learning. I've been taken through a wire fence through faulty taxying technique and groundlooped through an inability to recognise a swing on touchdown - oh and these were instructors....

I'm seriously thinking of taking my 'baby' back into sole ownership so if mistakes are made, they are mine. I just can't trust some of the group to do it even half-decently
robin is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 19:12
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver Island
oh and these were instructors....

Sorry to disagree with you robin, those were not " instructors " they were " Robots " just another product of the nanny state mentality.
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 19:15
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 0
From: South Norfolk, England
I learnt on tailwheel (or rather tailskid "DH82a") and have always landed tailwheel/nosewheel the same way ... or ways. Can't see what all the fuss is about to be honest

SS
shortstripper is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 19:37
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 1
From: Here
Question

Out of interest, what is the 'average' time required for a tail wheel endorsement? Vague ballpark?

Sam.
Sam Rutherford is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 19:37
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
From: Not a million miles from EGTF
Much as I agree with you Chuck, they did hold an instructors ticket.

I have to say there was a wonderful feeling as my a/c slowed to walking pace then headed off at 90 degrees to the runway, narrowly missing a runway light.

After all the years of being humilated by instructors, just once to get my own back!!!!!
robin is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 20:02
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver Island
After all the years of being humilated by instructors,

Anyone who teaches by humilitating their students is not an instructor, they are bullies who suffer from a lack of self confidence.

just once to get my own back!!!!!

The best way to handle a bully is smack them in the mouth with your fist....it is not PC but it is effective.

Last edited by Chuck Ellsworth; 12th January 2008 at 20:14.
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2008 | 21:09
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: heathrow
Oh, man. The first spelling mistake I've made in months, and somebody notices.
Being clever can be a bitch that bites sometimes eh!

Sorry Chuck I nearly said aircraft only bite fools!
llanfairpg is offline  
Reply
Old 13th January 2008 | 15:18
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 2
From: UK
I learnt on tailwheel (or rather tailskid "DH82a") and have always landed tailwheel/nosewheel the same way ... or ways. Can't see what all the fuss is about to be honest.
Exactly so. That clearly demonstrates the big disadvantage of teching people to fly in nosewheel aeroplanes - many are not taught how to land, but the aeroplane lets them get away with it (until the noseleg breaks). A sad reflection of many (by no means all) of today's instructors.

Learn on a taildragger, and the aeroplane will not tolerate sloppy technique.


SSD
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Reply
Old 13th January 2008 | 16:03
  #19 (permalink)  
Fly Conventional Gear
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
From: Winchester
One has taken over 25 hours to be sent solo and another 15 hours and even now they still fail to make a decent round-out and touchdown.
25 hours? I would start to question the quality of instruction being given if it was taking someone 25hrs (despite having lots of previous flying experience) to go solo in a basic trainer like the Cub. It's not rocket surgery .

Learn on a taildragger, and the aeroplane will not tolerate sloppy technique.
Exactly, I wish I had learnt on a taildragger. The Cub uncovered a habitual tedency on my part to flare high, which the PA28 had left gone unoticed. GA took a step backwards when the first generation of spamcans were introduced.

Out of interest, what is the 'average' time required for a tail wheel endorsement? Vague ballpark?
Most clubs say about 5hrs. I think that's a little optimistic though, with perhaps 8-10hrs to get really happy with the plane being more realistic. Getting a good instructor who is used to teaching in a tandem is very important.
Contacttower is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.