Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Redhill Aerodrome Ltd at it again

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Redhill Aerodrome Ltd at it again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jan 2008, 09:29
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Eire
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Accuracy?

Originally Posted by niknak
Neither of the links makes any mention of Redhill closing, runways being closed or existing aviation activities being affected by any proposed development.

For the sake of accuracy, clarity and fairness, would someone who has possession of the facts care to share them with us all.
You must have been reading a different application! Did you see the Design and Access statement which the applicants filed with the application?

Have a look at the link davidd gave. http://www.save-redhill-aerodrome.org. Good site. Lots of info.
LD Max is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2008, 21:58
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bump me up to the top
davidd is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2008, 12:17
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Not around here
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to the info on the above website link, the consultation period ENDS TODAY!

The link carries the email addresses to write to, so please get your objections in today.

C23
Cricket23 is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2008, 11:20
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Eire
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Consultation Date Extended

According to Tandridge, the consultation date has now been extended to 30/01/2008.

They have also opened up a consultation application with Reigate and Banstead (New ref: 08/00097/CONLA) which closes on 07/02/2008. (Curiously this is 2 days after the target decision date).

Anyway, please continue to submit your comments and objections as they will still be considered if there is enough time before a decision is made.
LD Max is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2008, 08:25
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Near EGKK
Age: 51
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Planning permission refused

I've just received this E-mail from Tandridge council:


Dear Sir/Madam,

Application: TA/2007/1794

Proposal: CHANGE OF USE OF LAND AND BUILDINGS TO BE USED AS AN EQUESTRIAN CENTRE.

Site: REDHILL AERODROME,KINGS MILL LANE,SOUTH NUTFIELD

I refer to your recent comments on the above proposal. These were carefully considered before the application was determined.

I would now inform you that the Council has decided to REFUSE permission.

Yours faithfully,

R.W Evans

Director of Planning

So it looks like good news this time around. Well done to everyone who sent in their objections, we live to fly another day!
paulthornton is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2008, 21:43
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Not around here
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes good news indeed.

I hear a rumour that there are two organisations who currently own other airfields who are interested in buying Redhill.

Could be good.

Regards,

C23
Cricket23 is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2008, 21:57
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Part of the problem is possibly that the District Council; has consistently turned down any and all proposals RAL made which could have enabled them to run a profitable GA business.

I suspect that the equestrian centre was refused out of habit as soon as they read the name at the top.

The District Council is of course driven by/owned by/afraid of the small group of people who live in South Nutfield overlooking the airfield, who come together under the name of KRAG.
Capot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.