Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

The Electric Wonder !

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

The Electric Wonder !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st January 2008 | 12:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
The Electric Wonder !

Have a look at this
172driver is offline  
Reply
Old 1st January 2008 | 12:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
From: Inside the roster matrix
Could this run alongside normal GA?.....we will have to wait and see.
Seems an exciting concept though, as long as the power is sustained from the cells.
PAPI-74 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st January 2008 | 13:08
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
From: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Interesting.

Electric planes will still make some noise on take-off and in cruise -- from the propellor blades thrashing the air.
Anyone for ducted fans?

But they could be salvation for a sport that in Europe is slowly dying, under pressure from rocketing fuel costs, anti-pollution measures
So how expensive will the electricity be and how long before it acquires a special tax? How "anti-pollution" will the electricity generation source be?

and the ire of residents around airfields.
Build a totally silent aeroplane and the buggers would still find something to bind over!
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Reply
Old 1st January 2008 | 19:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,766
Likes: 424
From: GA, USA
Diamond/Boeing are soon to fly a DA-20 with a hydrogen cell:
http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/...70327e_nr.html
B2N2 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st January 2008 | 20:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
From: The Burrow, N53:48:02 W1:48:57, The Tin Tent - EGBS, EGBO
the buggers would still find something to bind over!
They would probably object to the shadow cast as it flew overhead as it would deprive the plants in their gardens of vital energy and themselves of a decent suntan.
DX Wombat is offline  
Reply
Old 1st January 2008 | 20:56
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
There is absolutely no problem in building an electric 200kt 4-seat tourer - the 350HP brushless (3-phase) DC motor would weigh no more than 50kg.

It's the batteries..........

and (if they existed) where to charge them from. You would need more than a 13 amp socket

With a massive breakthrough in battery technology (of the order of 10 times better than present best) and nuclear fusion to generate the electricity, we have a good proposal
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st January 2008 | 21:19
  #7 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,115
Likes: 1,091
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
The battery technology can't be too far ahead in the future.
Watch this to see the power that can be stored at present:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=nneZKbKS4ng

Btw, many airfields do have 415 volt 3 phase power supplies so charging shouldn't be a major problem.

Last edited by ShyTorque; 1st January 2008 at 21:31.
ShyTorque is online now  
Reply
Old 1st January 2008 | 23:18
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: E Anglia
Forgive my naivety but to charge these new electric batteries shirley some fossil fuel has to be burnt or the odd isotope has to be cracked somewhere?

Just because it's further down the line and the electricity appears noiselessly at the flick of a switch, doesn't mean we won't still be paying for it and carbonising the atmosphere.

And I wouldn't like to be mid channel when the volts and amps ran out.

Cusco
Cusco is offline  
Reply
Old 1st January 2008 | 23:25
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Londonish
Not particularly in favour of electric, and completely agree it largely pushes the impact back upstream.. something that seems to be ignored with the so-called zero emission vehicles, but I can't resist:

And I wouldn't like to be mid channel when the volts and amps ran out.
Wouldn't like to be mid-channel when the avgas ran out either!

Surely still the same management / reserves issue, irrespective of the fuel
Mark1234 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2008 | 07:08
  #10 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,401
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
The brushless multi-phase DC motor requires quite sophisticated electronic control systems and power inverters, as well as storage batteries. But with the reliability of modern electronics and some system redundancy, that shouldn't present a huge problem?

Software control to optimise rpm prop pitch and monitor power reserves would, of course, be essential.

As long as weight is kept to a minimum. Which is always the problem with electric vehicles - the weight of the battery systems. But at least mobile phone/blackberry/laptop/PDA demands have already improved battery energy density quite significantly.

But could motor+batteries be kept below the weight of, say, an O-360 and around 300 lb of 100LL?

As for charging, solar wing panels could be integrated into a composite structure - and perhaps a small auxiliary diesel generator for back-up charging?

However, the market for an efficient 2/4 seat light electric aircraft with a 3-4 hour endurance is, regrettably, very small. So the ancient spamcan with its 1950s combine harvester engine is liable to rattle along for many years yet.

Perhaps the military UAV sector will stimulate design of something which could be modified for realistic personal transport?
BEagle is online now  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2008 | 08:20
  #11 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,490
Likes: 2
From: Between the woods and the water
Forgive my naivety but to charge these new electric batteries shirley some fossil fuel has to be burnt or the odd isotope has to be cracked somewhere?

Just because it's further down the line and the electricity appears noiselessly at the flick of a switch, doesn't mean we won't still be paying for it and carbonising the atmosphere.
Not many dinosaurs used to create electricity in France - 80% of their electricity comes from nuclear
airborne_artist is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2008 | 08:49
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
The brushless multi-phase DC motor requires quite sophisticated electronic control systems and power inverters
The technology is well established. It is widely used in everything from model aeroplanes (whose brushless motors are as powerful as highly tuned nitro-powered engines of similar size/weight) through industrial controls, right up to very big stuff.

It's the batteries....

I disagree re the market for a 2-4 seater with 4hrs endurance - after all that is all a spamcan does, with "PPL training" fuel management. The problem, even if batteries were available, would be the energy requirement. 100HP is about 75kW and for 3 hrs that is 225kWh. This is cheap enough - about £20 - but at 415V (3 phase) is a lot of amps. If you want say a 3hr recharge that is 75kW drawn (assuming 100% efficiency!) and that is just one aeroplane.

Forgetting real long distance cruisers and looking at low power low weight cases (which is where most electric propulsion is aimed at) one could do stuff like solar charging; for example a private owner who flies once a week could largely solar charge (in the summer) with photovoltaic panels costing as much as the plane itself.

There is a long way to go...
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2008 | 12:58
  #13 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 40
From: Various
Take of on batteries and when you get above 5000 feet you connect the little Jet-A powered jet-generator which tops up the battery again.

How big a gen would you need and how big a jet power system to run it?

Personally, I use repulsion as a power system. My plane is so ugly that the earth repels it! I believe that the Chevron microlight has a similar system.E

Blue Up
G-BMMF
blue up is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2008 | 13:38
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Perhaps the military UAV sector will stimulate design of something which could be modified for realistic personal transport?
It happens already.
The aero diesel engine development got a boost
by "single fuel battlefield" strategy by DoD.

Development of Thielert engines financed by Predator order...

Ptkay is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd January 2008 | 12:25
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 0
From: Surrey Hills
electric wonder

The range of 37 miles is a bit a of a let down!
aviate1138 is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd January 2008 | 13:03
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
So was that paltry effort at Kittyhawk some years ago!!
Crash one is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.