Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Piper Warrior or C152?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Piper Warrior or C152?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th November 2007 | 17:03
  #21 (permalink)  

 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Brussels - Twin Comanche PA39 - KA C90B
Sternone, why do you say that? Always found it to be the other way around myself.
Then it must be my fault, i landed both, and found the warrior much easier and much stabler.. do you find the cessna more stable ?
sternone is offline  
Reply
Old 16th November 2007 | 20:32
  #22 (permalink)  

Beacon Outbound
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 710
Likes: 22
From: "Home is were the answer machine is"
Sternone, why do you say that?
Cause he hasn't got a scooby?
IRRenewal is offline  
Reply
Old 16th November 2007 | 20:40
  #23 (permalink)  
Professional Student
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 678
Likes: 25
From: My Secret Island Lair
Then it must be my fault, i landed both, and found the warrior much easier and much stabler.. do you find the cessna more stable ?
No; I agree with you on the stability issue - I too found it lighter than the Piper, and not as stable in the cruise.

What I was asking was about your opinion of it's landing characteristics (I didn't imply it was your fault either, or at least didn't mean to). Do you mean that you found it easier to land because it's more stable on the approach, or some other reason?

My points, regarding landing the two types are that;

The Cessna lands at, IIRC, a lower speed than the Piper. Also I found it lighter on the controls, plus easier to crab/slip due to the high wing.

Also the later models of PA-28 I think float further due to the redesigned wing (as opposed to straight-wing Arrows etc). With the high wing of the Cessna I found this not to be the case, and easier to put it where I'd like.

Overall I found the 152 easier to land than the 28. Bearing in mind that the last time I flew a tricycle 152 (as opposed to the tailwheel converted aircraft I'm on now..) was over a year ago, so I apologise if my recollections are slightly inaccurate.
hobbit1983 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th November 2007 | 08:37
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: Livin de island life
Can't you do both, Robbo?

Maybe do 2/3 of the hours on the Cessna, to save some money. Then do the rest on the Arrow to keep up to speed on the wobby prop/retract stuff with maybe some IMC thrown in?
flyingfemme is offline  
Reply
Old 19th November 2007 | 11:31
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Aberdeen, Scotland
i would like to do both, however, there are strings attached with the 90quid an hour rate for the arrow. you have to do full 100 hours, or else you get charge normal rate, and you have to fly 16 hours a month. so, if i do half, i will not get 90/h rate, it will be 150something. if i could have done half and half, i would. with the 90 an hour rate it is all or none at that rate. with the c152 at 73/h i can do as much or as little as i want, the only restriction being i get that rate when i pay for a block of ten hours flying.

simple eh? lol
Robbo0885 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th November 2007 | 13:05
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: PURPA
my vote: the cessna 152!! save the 17 bucks a hour dude... then again warrior is fun to fly sometimes. I flew both of them btw.
vinayak is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.