Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

What is a C172 capable of?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

What is a C172 capable of?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Nov 2007, 07:25
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Witney
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excellent vis from a Cessna?? - agreed if you are sightseeing.


But for seeing other aircraft??? ----- 'kin joking. They scare the **** out of me. Might just as well be sitting in a letterbox looking out of the slit.
Sedbergh is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 08:59
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Poppycock. I have thousands of hours in cessna's and have never had a problem looking out the window and avoiding traffic.
S-Works is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 09:50
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Witney
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK then, but how do you see where you're going in a turn? (and I'm not taking the p***, it's a serious question).
Sedbergh is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 12:28
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lift the wing before the turn, look out the window. It's pretty simple stuff.
S-Works is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 12:39
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Witney
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good on yer then, you're the first Cessna driver I've come across that actually looks.
Sedbergh is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 13:04
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Then the Cessna drivers you are flying with need some remedial training in airmanship I would guess........
I have an inbuilt survival instinct, a simple check could save my life. When I am teaching I ingrain it into the student.
S-Works is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 13:26
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bose,

The AAIB have criticised the vis of the Cessna range, for example it the case of the Tornado and the 152 over Wales. In a more modern low wing design it would have at least been possible to see the Tornado coming.

Uses for a Cessna 172 (generically, no ones personal aircraft you understand)

Hen house

Example of corrosion and its impact on structural integrity

A classic design icon in a museum

An example of how inefficient 1950’s design is compared to the current day

An example of truly appalling handling

A comparison between 1920 engine tec and how far we have come with the modern diesel version.

An example of a really bad investment as thay become more and more undesirable as the modern replacements take over.

Rod1
(No I do not work for Cirrus)
Rod1 is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 13:31
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah! Yes I see. A cessna hit by a Tornado at several hundreds knots, the pilot would not have had a problem in say an MCR01.....

More uses for a 172, Night flight, night in Instrument conditions, over flight of towns.......

As opposed to the "replacements" being DAY/VFR only permit aicraft. You know what I prefer........
S-Works is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 13:47
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Burrow, N53:48:02 W1:48:57, The Tin Tent - EGBS, EGBO
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you're the first Cessna driver I've come across that actually looks.
Meet another one then. Then there are also the FIs I flew with when doing my PPL, not to mention those since then. Every single one of them lifted the wings before turning. You must have met a particularly dim bunch.
DX Wombat is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 14:02
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Witney
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well as a humble glider pilot I spend most of my airtime looking out of the window.

In my job I spend a lot of time being hauled around parts of Africa and S America in light aircraft, mostly Mr Cessna's products, driven by what are supposed to be "commercial" pilots.

And I've never known any of them to look properly before turning. And sorry guys, but in a high wing single, (for that read Cessna) it will always feel to me like I'm in a flying letter box.

Sorry Bose & the boys who do look out, but that's the way it is. I'm a lot happier in something like one of Mr Piper's flying devices. At least I can look for myself then.
Sedbergh is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 15:19
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bose-x

We are all still waiting with baited breath to find out if this 11 hour endurance long range fuel tank is a factory option?
A and C is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 18:52
  #52 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The AAIB have criticised the vis of the Cessna range, for example it the case of the Tornado and the 152 over Wales. In a more modern low wing design it would have at least been possible to see the Tornado coming.

How good was the viz from the Tornado? How come it flew into the Cessna?
 
Old 5th Nov 2007, 19:03
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
“How good was the viz from the Tornado? How come it flew into the Cessna?”

The pilot and the Instructor had banked Tornado to admire a red telephone box when they tripped over the 152, which was circling and taking pictures. The angle the Tornado hit the 152 made it impossible for the pilot to have seen the Tornado, even if he had been looking. In a DA40 / Cirrus / low wing VLA etc you would not have had the blind spot, which was pointed out at the time.

Rod1
Rod1 is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 19:45
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rod1 the Tornado hit the Cessna from approx th37 o'clock position whilst travelling in excess of 250 metres per second. Now tell what civilian aircraft the Cessna pilot could have been flying that would have allowed him to see the mil jet and take avoiding action. It is interesting to note the official BOI gave the cause of the accident as "The failure of the 2 pilots to see each other". How the hell do you see something coming up your *rse at that speed?
WorkingHard is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 19:47
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We are all still waiting with baited breath to find out if this 11 hour endurance long range fuel tank is a factory option
?

Sorry I had no idea that WE were waiting with baited breath, if you were that keen to get an answer you could have PM'd me.

It is a cessna Ferry tank, goes in the baggage bay at the back. Bought it to go Oshkosh next year. Is even approved for an external filler cap.
S-Works is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 19:59
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not wishing to be pedantic but there have been two accidents between military aircraft and 152s.

#1 was a JAGUAR and a 152 with the Jaguar hitting the Cessna from behind.

#2 was a TORNADO and a 152 in the Gamston area where the (inexperienced) Tornado student was head down in the cockpit selecting switches.
smarthawke is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 20:25
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WorkingHard

I have not had time to look the exact details up so I have been relying on memory.

Not sure what “th37 o'clock” is but IF I remember the details then any bubble canopy aircraft would have had a chance to see the Tornado. Most modern low wing VLA types allow you a full view of the tail. I never mentioned anything about avoiding action!

Rod1
Rod1 is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 22:32
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bose-x

OK so not a factory option, what I was trying to get a grip on is what the C172 can do as a production aircraft.

We can all fit aftermarket bits of kit but I suspect that the tank you have is a ferry tank that is only cleared for ferrying the aircraft, not as in the case of the Robin suplimental tank that is a standard factory option.

I have no objection to Cessna aircraft they are a very workmanlike And rugged bit of kit (I own two of them) but in pure performance terms the fact is that the 172XP is out classed by an aircraft built out of something that looks like old tea chests with a fixed pitch prop and 20HP less power in the engine department.

As me if the Robin is a realistic rental aircraft and I will tell you that I would take the Cessna each tme!
A and C is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2007, 23:46
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most modern low wing VLA types allow you a full view of the tail
Hmmmmm..... so I take it then, they also come fitted with rearview mirrors
172driver is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2007, 02:08
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Looking for the signals square at LHR
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh no! Not again - I thought this very silly subject had been done to death before.

DAVE W - Since nobody seems to have answered your question, I shall.

In the UK and english speaking world generally, a Stall Turn is a vertical climb continued until flying speed no longer can be maintained, full rudder is applied to swing the aircraft about its "Z" axis to then face vertically downwards. A Hammerhead involves going backwards, erect or inverted (positive or negative).

However, in the USA things are a little different. There the Stall Turn is known as a Hammerhead. Why this should be so I am unable to say but they refuse to acknowledge our terminology on the basis that a stall is a condition pertinent to an aerofoil section only under load and since there is no load applied to the wing in this vertical manoeuvre, it cannot stall and in consequence the term is inappropriate. Pedantic perhaps but nevertheless correct.

For this reason it is prudent to get things clear with trans-Atlantic types. I once was teaching basic aeros in a Victa Airtourer to an American who was insistent that I showed him how to perform a Hammerhead and was quite upset at my refusal since the aircraft was not cleared for same. Back on the ground it became clear that he wanted to do Stall Turns - not "Tailslides" which is the American version of the Hammerhead.

GQ.
Gipsy Queen is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.