Aerobatics in a Rallye
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
From: 75N 16E
Aerobatics in a Rallye
Has anyone done any aerobatics in a Rallye? I'm just curious as to how it handled - ours is a 160HP SV. I'm doing the AOPA course and as our attempt to buy a Bulldog seems to have fallen through I thought it'd be nice to do the odd roll in our Rallye (once I have finished the course 
)....
Cheers
)....Cheers
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: UK
Is this round two of the ecent long running `rolling a 172 thread`? - lets hope not. I have not flown a Rallye or read the POH so have no idea if rolling is even permitted. However I do know they are very prone to corrosion and that I have never heard one being described as even semi-aerobatic (like the Beagel Pups). So I recommend that you ditch the idea promptly and rent something designed for the job until your aquisition plans come to fruition. I am assuming that the POH makes no mention of `rolling` or you would not be asking the question on here.
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 1
From: Oop North, UK
I have not flown a Rallye or read the POH so have no idea if rolling is even permitted.
Not sure about all versions but I know some are aerobatic, so long now since I flew one that I will leave it to others to comment.
Joined: Feb 2001
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 2
From: Worcestershire, UK
I haven't read the POH either, and was thinking the same thing Foxmoth.
Well I know Wikipedia aint the POH, but:
Hopefully a Rallye driver will be along in due course to provide definitive information 
I have never heard one being described as even semi-aerobatic
After the war Morane-Saulnier produced a number of trainer and civilian aircraft models, of which the best-known was the successful "Rallye" series of four-seat STOL semi-aerobatic tourers
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 279
Likes: 20
From: Ludlow, England
I only ever flew the 880, which was underpowered and unaerobatic.
However, the bigger engined versions were more capable as this picture shows
Just the thing for dealing with people who cut you up in the circuit.
RD
However, the bigger engined versions were more capable as this picture shows
Just the thing for dealing with people who cut you up in the circuit.
RD
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
From: 75N 16E
Yes it is semi "aerobatic", so you don't have to fear . The POH describes a number of manoeuvres that it is cleared for in the utility cat, including rolls, spins, stall turns, loops etc...We also don't have any corrosion problems (completely rebuilt in 2005).
I ask because not being an aero's expert (though have done some and will do some more in a proper aeros aeroplane) I would like someone elses opinion on how the aeroplane handles in these aero's. I'd imagine if doing a loop the leading edge slats would pop out and wondered how this would affect the loop. Also is it possible to even loop the thing and keep within the G limitations? The G limits of the Rallye are only 4.5G or 4.75G (haven't got the POH on me here) I think in the utility cat, which is not much, but the POH states not to exceed 3G in any manoeuvre (I guess to give a buffer).....Unlike the 172 the Rallye is very responsive and has a good rate of roll...
Just curious really, I wouldn't do any hardcore aero's in it, but the odd wingover, roll etc....would be nice
. The POH describes a number of manoeuvres that it is cleared for in the utility cat, including rolls, spins, stall turns, loops etc...We also don't have any corrosion problems (completely rebuilt in 2005).I ask because not being an aero's expert (though have done some and will do some more in a proper aeros aeroplane) I would like someone elses opinion on how the aeroplane handles in these aero's. I'd imagine if doing a loop the leading edge slats would pop out and wondered how this would affect the loop. Also is it possible to even loop the thing and keep within the G limitations? The G limits of the Rallye are only 4.5G or 4.75G (haven't got the POH on me here) I think in the utility cat, which is not much, but the POH states not to exceed 3G in any manoeuvre (I guess to give a buffer).....Unlike the 172 the Rallye is very responsive and has a good rate of roll...
Just curious really, I wouldn't do any hardcore aero's in it, but the odd wingover, roll etc....would be nice
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk
With the caveat that I have never even sat in a Rallye, far less flown one: I see no reason why you would need to pull more than 3G to loop.
All the aerobatic types that I have flown (Pitts, Eagle, CAP, Extra, Tiger Moth, Stampe) all have had min and max entry speeds for a range of maneouvers in the POH. Some were even placarded in the airframe.
If it were me and the book said inside loop 80-140 units of IAS. I'd firstly check that the ASI and the book were using the same units. If one is in KPH and the other in Knots, then I'd mentally calibrate the ASI to reflect the book. On a CoA aircraft, the ASI should use the same units but I have known where this was not the case! I assume that there is an accelerometer in the a/c - if not I'd gaffer tape one somewhere safe and visible.
After ensuring the W&B were inside acceptable limits and that the airframe was secure (loose cushions, etc), my first attempt would be solo, at something like 4000'.
Dive to 120, then gently pull back to 3G, feed in right rudder as she decellerates, you'll need more back stick as the elevator is less energised at lower speed, float over the top from 10 to 2 and then recommence my pull to 3G on the downhill portion.
If it is struggling over the top, I'd make my second one at 130units and see how that improved things, then at 140. If it coped admirably at 120, then I'd start the next loop at 110, then at 100, then 90, etc.
I would also note the start height and finish height and if possible, the speed at the top whilst inverted!
You will then have a good idea of how responsive/stable the a/c is at different speeds. This will then help you on your second sortie when you want to demonstrate the loop to someone brave.
Stik
All the aerobatic types that I have flown (Pitts, Eagle, CAP, Extra, Tiger Moth, Stampe) all have had min and max entry speeds for a range of maneouvers in the POH. Some were even placarded in the airframe.
If it were me and the book said inside loop 80-140 units of IAS. I'd firstly check that the ASI and the book were using the same units. If one is in KPH and the other in Knots, then I'd mentally calibrate the ASI to reflect the book. On a CoA aircraft, the ASI should use the same units but I have known where this was not the case! I assume that there is an accelerometer in the a/c - if not I'd gaffer tape one somewhere safe and visible.
After ensuring the W&B were inside acceptable limits and that the airframe was secure (loose cushions, etc), my first attempt would be solo, at something like 4000'.
Dive to 120, then gently pull back to 3G, feed in right rudder as she decellerates, you'll need more back stick as the elevator is less energised at lower speed, float over the top from 10 to 2 and then recommence my pull to 3G on the downhill portion.
If it is struggling over the top, I'd make my second one at 130units and see how that improved things, then at 140. If it coped admirably at 120, then I'd start the next loop at 110, then at 100, then 90, etc.
I would also note the start height and finish height and if possible, the speed at the top whilst inverted!
You will then have a good idea of how responsive/stable the a/c is at different speeds. This will then help you on your second sortie when you want to demonstrate the loop to someone brave.
Stik
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
From: SX in SX in UK
I threw the Koliber's POH out quite recently, I knew it was a mistake!
ISTR that she was cleared for gentle aerobatics, but not for intentional spinning.
What makes me think twice about aerobatting a Rallye would be the leading edge slats. I would imagine that coming around the top of a loop, one would be fairly slow which causes the slats come out. These give extra lift, which is fine if you are the right way up, but maybe not quite so helpful if you are inverted.
Stik - you are the expert - any comments??
ISTR that she was cleared for gentle aerobatics, but not for intentional spinning.
What makes me think twice about aerobatting a Rallye would be the leading edge slats. I would imagine that coming around the top of a loop, one would be fairly slow which causes the slats come out. These give extra lift, which is fine if you are the right way up, but maybe not quite so helpful if you are inverted.
Stik - you are the expert - any comments??
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: England
I'm no expert, but since you are (hopefully) still pulling positive g at the top of the loop, then the slats would assist in the normal fashion - i.e. reducing the stall speed (normal +ve stall remember, even if you are upside down) and helping you around the loop.
OK guys - that's my uninformed guess: I will acept any more knowledgeable replies / criticisms. Try to avoid the personal attacks though - it's embarrasing to cry in the office.
OK guys - that's my uninformed guess: I will acept any more knowledgeable replies / criticisms. Try to avoid the personal attacks though - it's embarrasing to cry in the office.
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: London
I have flown a few hours in a 145hp Rallye. It is cleared for aeros and I have looped it and slow rolled it.
Loops are pretty standard, but you need a fair bit of pitch up before entering the slow roll.
Good fun machine...
Air18150: I really can't see why you would bother to post such drivel...
Loops are pretty standard, but you need a fair bit of pitch up before entering the slow roll.
Good fun machine...
Air18150: I really can't see why you would bother to post such drivel...
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: southeast UK
Later series Rallyes with the taller fin and rudder (100S, 100ST and their 150hp bretheren) were intentionally spinnable but have to be thrown in otherwise it is prone to a spiral dive.
The 150ST was supposedly aerobatic in the 'utility' category with reduced fuel and payload. Have been through a couple of loops many years ago in one and found them basically simple with no vices. Its lack of inverted systems and overall puff would tend to leave it out of the aerobatic competition arena.
If flying one that has been previously aerobatted look for ripples in the upper skin of the wings as this is where the tell tale signs of high G manifests itself.
The 150ST was supposedly aerobatic in the 'utility' category with reduced fuel and payload. Have been through a couple of loops many years ago in one and found them basically simple with no vices. Its lack of inverted systems and overall puff would tend to leave it out of the aerobatic competition arena.
If flying one that has been previously aerobatted look for ripples in the upper skin of the wings as this is where the tell tale signs of high G manifests itself.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
Tiger Moths have slats and if I remember there is a requirement to lock them closed before aerobatting. This is because one can deploy without the other, which sort of throws things off balance.
Maybe the Rallye has the slats linked (so that neither or both always deploy).
As Stik says just take it gently and be high. The danger in a loop is that you are upside down and slow at the top (well you should be). If unco-ordinated and too slow this could go all wobbly on you and cause an inverted spin. I would get the recomended speeds and keep in the top third ie if its 100-130 kts then start at 120. Might be easier to start with a wing over first and then maybe a roll.
Maybe the Rallye has the slats linked (so that neither or both always deploy).
As Stik says just take it gently and be high. The danger in a loop is that you are upside down and slow at the top (well you should be). If unco-ordinated and too slow this could go all wobbly on you and cause an inverted spin. I would get the recomended speeds and keep in the top third ie if its 100-130 kts then start at 120. Might be easier to start with a wing over first and then maybe a roll.
Last edited by Zulu Alpha; 9th October 2007 at 17:43.
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Kent
ISTR that she was cleared for gentle aerobatics, but not for intentional spinning.
tKF
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 3
From: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Zulu Alpha says:
Maybe the Rallye has the slats linked (so that neither or both always deploy).
Yes, they most certainly are! A part of the pre-flight check is to gently get hold of one and pull it out and check that the other side comes out in unison.
I did my first 100 hours in Rallyes and the ones we had (including a 150ST) were aerobatic at utility config. We had one instructor who was keen on aeros and would do so at the slightest excuse. Rolls, loops and stall turns all within the a/c's capabilities.
However, our CFI didn't like us doing aeros because of the cost of replacing the gyro instruments on a frequent basis as the bearings got shot to h*ll.
Now, spinning. Some would say that the Rallye couldn't enter a true spin because you couldn't maintain a stalled wing as the a/c yawed due to the slats and all you were doing was a tight spiral dive. However, the old C150 trick of 1500RPM, pull smartly up then stamp on the left rudder pedal was pretty dramatic and went round plenty fast enough for me! Spinning was just being taken out of the syllabus then so I didn't have to do it for the GFT.
If Koliber have taken aeros out of their POH for the a/c type, shame on them!
Yes, corrosion is a problem with Rallyes, ours succommed to a new spar, but I think you'd find it before the airframe degraded beyond the stated 'G' limits.
Every Rallye I've flown has a 'G' meter fitted as standard, an indication of the manufacturers invitation to do aeros in it, I think. Ours used to indicate 2.5G on a startup, it shook about so much.
A great fun aeroplane, super for short strips but the lower powered versions especially are really uncomfortable on long trips.
Rallye Driver:
I think I sat in that one at Farnborough many years ago. The stick had a firing button on it. Great!
Cheers,
TheOddOne
Maybe the Rallye has the slats linked (so that neither or both always deploy).
Yes, they most certainly are! A part of the pre-flight check is to gently get hold of one and pull it out and check that the other side comes out in unison.
I did my first 100 hours in Rallyes and the ones we had (including a 150ST) were aerobatic at utility config. We had one instructor who was keen on aeros and would do so at the slightest excuse. Rolls, loops and stall turns all within the a/c's capabilities.
However, our CFI didn't like us doing aeros because of the cost of replacing the gyro instruments on a frequent basis as the bearings got shot to h*ll.
Now, spinning. Some would say that the Rallye couldn't enter a true spin because you couldn't maintain a stalled wing as the a/c yawed due to the slats and all you were doing was a tight spiral dive. However, the old C150 trick of 1500RPM, pull smartly up then stamp on the left rudder pedal was pretty dramatic and went round plenty fast enough for me! Spinning was just being taken out of the syllabus then so I didn't have to do it for the GFT.
If Koliber have taken aeros out of their POH for the a/c type, shame on them!
Yes, corrosion is a problem with Rallyes, ours succommed to a new spar, but I think you'd find it before the airframe degraded beyond the stated 'G' limits.
Every Rallye I've flown has a 'G' meter fitted as standard, an indication of the manufacturers invitation to do aeros in it, I think. Ours used to indicate 2.5G on a startup, it shook about so much.
A great fun aeroplane, super for short strips but the lower powered versions especially are really uncomfortable on long trips.
Rallye Driver:
I think I sat in that one at Farnborough many years ago. The stick had a firing button on it. Great!
Cheers,
TheOddOne
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk
Koli - not at all an expert, just enthusiastic!!
You are flying a +ve maneouvere, as ZA says the slats in the Tiger are locked before looping, if fitted, not sure about the Rallye.
ZA says, if slow and wobbly it could be an inverted spin. What I believe he really means is a positive spin entered from the inverted. Top of a loop the stick is well aft of neutral and unless you "grossly" mishandle the recovery, it will not cross-over and go negative on you. But if you do that can be a wild ride, I speak from experience!
You are flying a +ve maneouvere, as ZA says the slats in the Tiger are locked before looping, if fitted, not sure about the Rallye.
ZA says, if slow and wobbly it could be an inverted spin. What I believe he really means is a positive spin entered from the inverted. Top of a loop the stick is well aft of neutral and unless you "grossly" mishandle the recovery, it will not cross-over and go negative on you. But if you do that can be a wild ride, I speak from experience!
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 235
Likes: 3
From: Down South, preferably inverted
englishal said
Just a thought....
Check your POH for W&B considerations when doing aeros first (i.e where's the C of G with two up)...... but, why don't you ask someone we both know, to go up with you a few times, so that you've got someone more experienced with you whilst you're gently exploring what it can do??
You know he wants to make sure his students are safe to enjoy their aeros, so I reckon he'd say yes....
When I am a bit braver (and done a few more aeros in another aeroplane) maybe I'll try a solo roll to get started...
Check your POH for W&B considerations when doing aeros first (i.e where's the C of G with two up)...... but, why don't you ask someone we both know
, to go up with you a few times, so that you've got someone more experienced with you whilst you're gently exploring what it can do??You know he wants to make sure his students are safe to enjoy their aeros, so I reckon he'd say yes....
Last edited by Mad Girl; 10th October 2007 at 09:29.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
What I believe he really means is a positive spin entered from the inverted.
So what I meant was what Stik said, a zero airspeed flop off the top with possible a positive spin to follow. All good fun but the recovery will take quite some height, creates quite some airspeed and quite some G's....Enjoy.
Being a bit faster at the start will ensure good controllability over the top. So its better to be fast to start than slow.
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 1
From: Oop North, UK
All good fun but the recovery will take quite some height, creates quite some airspeed and quite some G's....Enjoy.
