Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Oakhanger HIRTA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th September 2007 | 20:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Southern England
Oakhanger HIRTA

How dangerous is Oakhanger HIRTA ?

Does anyone ignore the warnings and fly through it ?


From AIP:-

3.2
High Intensity Radio Transmission Area (HIRTA) - Airspace of defined dimensions within which there is radio energy of
an intensity which may cause interference with and on rare occasions damage to communications and navigation equipment.
3.2.1 Areas within which there is radio energy of an intensity which could cause interference with and on rare occasions, cause
damage to, communications and navigation equipment such as Radio Altimeter, VOR, ILS and Doppler are listed at ENR 5.3. The
intensity may be sufficient to detonate electrically initiated explosive devices carried or fitted in aircraft.
3.2.2 Only the most significant sources are listed and in some of these areas the intensity of the radio energy may be such that it
would be injurious to remain for more than one minute in the immediate vicinity of the energy source. This is especially relevant to
helicopter operations and the list contains appropriate warnings; however it would be prudent for helicopter pilots to avoid lingering
closer than 100 m to any radar aerial. Pilots approaching oil production platforms on which dish aerials can be observed should,
wherever possible, approach from a direction out of the general line-of-shoot of such aerials.


easy307 is offline  
Reply
Old 13th September 2007 | 21:35
  #2 (permalink)  
Professional Student
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 678
Likes: 25
From: My Secret Island Lair
How dangerous is Oakhanger HIRTA ?
Well, given that

the intensity of the radio energy may be such that it
would be injurious to remain for more than one minute in the immediate vicinity of the energy source.
which I take to mean that it would be injurious to my health to mess around with it, it could be very dangerous?

Does anyone ignore the warnings and fly through it ?
Why? Is it really worth the hassle, or indeed good airmanship?
hobbit1983 is offline  
Reply
Old 13th September 2007 | 23:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
From: The front end and about 50ft up
There are a whole host of reasons why you don't mess with HIRTAs, most learnt in the past by others through bitter experience. As a general rule to live by, if you're warned not to do something, there's normally a good reason for it, even if you don't know what that is.

HIRTAs may f**k up numerous systems on board your aircraft and of these, the system I care about the most are my 'nads. If you want to have kids one day, respect the HIRTA!
Fg Off Max Stout is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2007 | 01:38
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 1
From: Oop North, UK
But I bet you would drive past on the road without a second thought!
foxmoth is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2007 | 07:13
  #5 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,458
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
If you had access to Part 4 of the UK Mil AIP, you could look in there and see the true extent and effect of Oakhanger. In this document, it states that the hazard is only in the sector 090 TO 270 deg, in other words it's actually a semi circle NOT a full circle. In any case although it MIGHT affect on board electronic gizmo's, it was actually established when a Wessex fitted with radio triggered flotation bags flew through it and the bags inflated!
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2007 | 08:02
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 1
From: England
I know a couple of chaps who don't want any more kids (60+) who happily fly through HIRTAS to get an advantage in gliding competitions.
18greens is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2007 | 08:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Yateley, Hants
It's not exactly difficult to fly around!!
flyingsteve55 is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2007 | 09:14
  #8 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 2
From: Worcestershire, UK
So I guess we're not gonna see any of you HIRTA avoiders at the annual Croft Farm flyin then

(Croft farm airstrip is situated within the Defford HIRTA)

Incidently, fly anywhere within abt 5 miles of the Woofferton HIRTA and you get German (usually) or Welsh (sometimes) radio coming through your headsets regardless of frequency selected. Never noticed warming of any body parts though
Mariner9 is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2007 | 15:45
  #9 (permalink)  
Administrator
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 8,121
Likes: 686
From: Twickenham, home of rugby
Never noticed warming of any body parts though
Damn, I thought this would be a good alternative to a vasectomy!

SD
Saab Dastard is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2007 | 17:20
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Bournemouth
My folks used to live about 2nm away from the Oakhanger 'golf balls'. On many occasions I would look up and see light aircraft transiting overhead. Can't say for sure but I'm not entirely sure if anything actually goes on there any more! (I'm not saying go ahead and fly over...just an observation from the ground) There were talks of turning the place into an asylum centre!!!
Nimrod615 is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2007 | 17:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: England
Well in our old aeroplane with the original non FM immune radios, we always were reminded to turn off our mobile phones because of the "dit dit dit" in our ears as the phone was logging in.

In our new shiney plane with a Garmin G1000 there is no interference from mobile phones. Presumably this is because the radios etc have undergone a lot of EMC improvement.

I suspect that the new avionics wouldn't be bothered by these HIRTA transmissions.

Any thoughts?
Three Yellows is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2007 | 19:18
  #12 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,115
Likes: 1,091
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
In any case although it MIGHT affect on board electronic gizmo's, it was actually established when a Wessex fitted with radio triggered flotation bags flew through it and the bags inflated!
Probably that Navy Wessex that landed at Lasham by mistake, still trying to find Odiham....
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 15th September 2007 | 08:12
  #13 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,458
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
Oakhanger is still very much functioning; it transmits high power level data to satellites mostly in geostationary orbits over the equator (they can't be anywhere else in fact) hence the fact it's only harmful in the southerly quadrant.
chevvron is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.