Is It A Wonder Accidents Happen!!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First post after months of lurking but here goes...
Personally I'd prefer to have a compass, wristwatch, ASI and altimeter.
Gents (not just bose-x), I may have bugger all flying experience compared to you but this sort of silly chest puffing is why I've never posted in this forum before. You're setting a very bad example to students, new PPL's and giving a really bad impression of pilots to the world at large.
If you feel the need and competency to do your checks on the run then fair enough but please keep it to yourself and let everyone else do it thoroughly. There are enough PA28 shaped holes in the ground already this year.
Originally Posted by bose-x
I flew a Chipmunk to Lille and back via Calais to display it. VFR with only a radio.
Gents (not just bose-x), I may have bugger all flying experience compared to you but this sort of silly chest puffing is why I've never posted in this forum before. You're setting a very bad example to students, new PPL's and giving a really bad impression of pilots to the world at large.
If you feel the need and competency to do your checks on the run then fair enough but please keep it to yourself and let everyone else do it thoroughly. There are enough PA28 shaped holes in the ground already this year.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
of silly chest puffing is why I've never posted in this forum before
Everyone is an expert, so someone says "he took off without doing any pre-flight checks" and everyone else gos "oooh, what bad airmanship". Then someone pipes up and says, "hang on, pre-flight checks can be done rather quickly you know" and then the new PPL wannabe pipes up "oooh, he didn't use a checklist, what bad airmanship, my instructor ALWAYS insists I use one", then someone else pipes up in suppport of the first person, and then they are accused of setting a bad example to students. Then DFC quotes chapter and verse from his "How to be a really good pilot in theory" book and the whole thread de-generates into "I'm going to tell my dad on you", schoolkid rubbish.
It goes back to what GEMMA says:
My instructor mentioned he is currently putting together a new checklist with the REASONS why we do the checks added.
Everyone knows water in fuel can be a killer, there has more than one person been killed by water in fuel who HAS checked their tanks.....the water had frozen, only to melt after take off when the tanks have warmed. DFC's wonderful procedues would not catch this, though I would say that Bose's POST FLIGHT / POST refuel might.
Anway, each to their own....I'm not going to NOT do anything which is going to risk my neck or anyone elses up there...
Safe flying.
Last edited by englishal; 19th Sep 2007 at 04:29.
Guest
Posts: n/a
didn't occur to me before if there was no drop at all, the linkage might have come off
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Right here
Age: 50
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by G-EMMA
I actually stopped using my checklist on the external checks ages ago, I actually found worrying about the checklist made me forget things as I put it down to check fuel levels, then had to go back to pick it up.
I'm not sure I've ever actually seen anyone use a checklist on an external preflight, except the occasional student; go figure...
I think that if you were to use a checklist for a walk around, it might be best to do the walk around without it, and then run through the checklist to make sure you didn't forget anything. Any checklist that is used as a "do-list" is slow and inefficient IMO.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Aberdeen, UK
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What about the gotcha when the shroud/box (not sure what the technical term is) has corroded/is defective to the extent that it is leaking in cold air, meaning that the carb heat effect is reduced - it is in fact supplying partial heat to the venturi.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to my POH my engine is "not vulnerable" to induction icing however does have an automatic switch over thingy on top of the engine to draw air from inside the cowl should the external port become iced over.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North of South
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm my understanding , as little as it is , is that induction icing affects carburettors due to venturis and such like , Fuel Inj doesnt have one so where does the induction icing come from???????
not a flippant comment , a genuine question
not a flippant comment , a genuine question
True but it is not something that can be selected and tested during powerchecks etc
I used to fly an aeroplane with only two wheels, no mixture control, no brakes, automatic slats and automatic carb heat. I never did see a check list for it.
Hmm my understanding , as little as it is , is that induction icing affects carburettors due to venturis and such like , Fuel Inj doesnt have one so where does the induction icing come from???????
not a flippant comment , a genuine question
not a flippant comment , a genuine question
Edit: Which is what Bose-X was just talking about I believe.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Euroland
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good heads up on the article.
Ah, the old misconception that a pre-fligth is not required if the aircraft is left alone on the apron for a period of time during the day.
The pre-flight inspection should be the last thing one does before entering the aircraft to depart and as was explained earlier, should be done every time.
If one sticks to that then one would naturally complete an inspection every flight just before boarding and when the re-fueling and water checks have been done etc etc to check for loose caps, dripping drains etc and (as done a short time ago at a big airport in the South) leaving a manual on the wing which deposited a ream of pages across the runway!
-------------
englishal,
I read that story about the ice in the fuel elsewhere also.
Regards,
DFC
Ah, the old misconception that a pre-fligth is not required if the aircraft is left alone on the apron for a period of time during the day.
The pre-flight inspection should be the last thing one does before entering the aircraft to depart and as was explained earlier, should be done every time.
If one sticks to that then one would naturally complete an inspection every flight just before boarding and when the re-fueling and water checks have been done etc etc to check for loose caps, dripping drains etc and (as done a short time ago at a big airport in the South) leaving a manual on the wing which deposited a ream of pages across the runway!
-------------
englishal,
I read that story about the ice in the fuel elsewhere also.
Regards,
DFC