Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Reasonable Insurance Costs

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Reasonable Insurance Costs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd May 2007, 21:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LONDON
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reasonable Insurance Costs

I currently pay £2.5k a year for a PA 28 Arrow - can anyone recommend a good and hopefully lower cost insurance company!
Romydog is offline  
Old 4th May 2007, 12:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like a good deal to me. We pay a bit North of £3k for a PA32 300 and have had a good look around. Nearly all the brokers go to the same underwriter as far as I can see so there doesn't seem to be that much choice.
owenlars is offline  
Old 4th May 2007, 14:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cardiff, UK
Age: 62
Posts: 1,214
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have heard that these Belgian insurers are very competitive. (Insurance placed anywhere within the EC would comply with legal requirements). Their website's in French, and haven't asked them for a quote yet myself so can't confirm anything. If you do try them, would be great if you could post some feedback here
Mariner9 is offline  
Old 4th May 2007, 15:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah GA & Portsmouth UK
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's about 1k for a Luscombe!
Mike Cross is offline  
Old 4th May 2007, 15:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is 1k cheap or expensive?

I pay just under £3k for a SEP with an agreed-value hull cover of £195k. This is a single named pilot only, business and private, FAA PPL/IR, 700+hrs, done via Hall & Clarke. It would come down a lot for a lower hull value. It will probably come down more when I get the CPL done.
IO540 is offline  
Old 4th May 2007, 22:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah GA & Portsmouth UK
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, we like to think it's expensive and would prefer it to be around the 800 mark. I dare say we could do just us much damage to yours though by running into it as you could do by driving it into a brick wall. Maybe the hull value of what you might hit is a factor in the calculation? (certainly seems to figure in the MoD's)
Mike Cross is offline  
Old 5th May 2007, 08:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 3rd party cover is the limiting factor; you don't need to insure the hull at all.

It's easy to taxi into another plane, and they will just love to have a brand new £50k wing while they are at it, thank you very much...

I think practically all liability in GA is to do with driving around on the ground, plus passengers.
IO540 is offline  
Old 5th May 2007, 09:17
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Scotland
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interestingly Haywards could not have cared a jot that I offered to impose a minimum total flying hours of 5000 per pilot, ATPL holders only. Their risk was based purely on total piston engine time. At the moment I pay 2.5k for an 80k hull value and minimum 500hrs piston engine pilot experience. Raising that limit to 1000hrs minimum experience would lower the premium to around £2.2k.
Kiltie is offline  
Old 5th May 2007, 13:11
  #9 (permalink)  
niknak
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting one this, I had a word with a buddy who is the boat insurance business, (his firm also insures high value anything but marine is his speciality).
He told me that with such things as privately owned/operated light aircraft and boats, the premium is usually around 10% of the sum they would pay out in the event of a total loss.

"Such vessels operated by professionally qualified crews are subject to much lower premiums".
There you have it.
niknak is offline  
Old 6th May 2007, 17:39
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: On the right of the clowns and to the left of the jokers
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try Haywards Aviation at www.haywards.net
HS125 is offline  
Old 6th May 2007, 17:53
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the premium is usually around 10% of the sum they would pay out in the event of a total loss.

My premium is just 1.5% of the total loss payout - assuming no claim from passengers or 3rd parties.

A 10% premium is extremely high and shows something is very wrong. I've heard of 10-20% premiums on satellite launches.

Very true about disregarding TT for an ATP and looking at piston time only; I can confirm that and it makes sense.

I don't see a much lower premium if I had 10k piston hours and an ATPL - maybe 30% off. I know a CPL won't get me more than 5%-10% or so.
IO540 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.