Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

MoD Tucano Sell Off

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

MoD Tucano Sell Off

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th February 2007 | 18:12
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 532
Likes: 2
From: UK
Genghis - thanks very much for that useful link, I had no idea that they were also selling non-airworthy examples, I do now though!
RAFAT is offline  
Reply
Old 26th February 2007 | 19:32
  #22 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 680
Likes: 2
From: An Airport Near You
They charge for a reg? But you just said they don't unless you want to fly??!!
360BakTrak is offline  
Reply
Old 26th February 2007 | 20:09
  #23 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: UK
Back to the thread...

Having flown a Tucano today for the first time in a few years, I think you'd be mad to buy one. Fun, granted, but for fast A to B you'd be better off in something a little more comfortable. That would be pretty much anything. For general looning around in, buy a Yak / Extra / Sukhoi and you'd have plenty of money left over to run it.

But it's your money!
Feck is offline  
Reply
Old 26th February 2007 | 20:45
  #24 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
I know nothing about these, but aren't there quite a few other turboprops of similar performance (e.g. Pilatus) and with a more modern engine?
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 27th February 2007 | 00:30
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 532
Likes: 2
From: UK
!!!! - is that so? why? the article in Flyer magazine spoke quite highly of the Tuc. Of course the reporter may not have the comparative experience that you have.
RAFAT is offline  
Reply
Old 27th February 2007 | 07:00
  #26 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 188
Likes: 1
From: Goodwood
I believe that the reporter (who has flown or owned all of the types mentioned above) specifically stated that he was unlikely to be able to afford to run one on his fleet.
greeners is offline  
Reply
Old 27th February 2007 | 21:20
  #27 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: UK
RAFAT,

What's it for? A to B at 240 kt can be achieved in other turboprops without the hassle of protective clothing / uncomfortable bang-seats. The oil system places restrictive time limits on less-than-1g flight, which coupled with monstrous torque and heavy controls means aeros are less fun than in a dedicated steed. I guess people will want them for the best of both worlds...to be able to go places and aerobat if the mood takes. I confess I have no idea what they'll be selling for (and hence how desirable compared with other ac), but maintenance is not likely to be cheap. Furthermore they're not as solid as most other military ac, need tarmac and turboprops are noisy.

If it was my money I'd look elsewhere, but I appreciate the novelty / prestige factor may be alluring.
Feck is offline  
Reply
Old 28th February 2007 | 01:30
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 532
Likes: 2
From: UK
Thanks for the advice. I've done enough aeros to last me more than a few lifetimes so it wouldn't be for that, simply the appeal of a reasonably respectable touring distance, 240 kts, FL250, and a bit of novelty value thrown in as you point out.
RAFAT is offline  
Reply
Old 28th February 2007 | 08:06
  #29 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
Don't forget, the type has no civil CofA, so you'd have to go through a lot of work to get it into a PtF, then still be restricted to day VMC, and need permission to fly it outside of the UK.

I believe it's possible to get a Pilatus PC7 Mk.1 with an EASA CofA, that would not have those restrictions, and probably be a better aircraft anyway. (Having done quite a lot of flight testing on the Tucano early in it's RAF career, I'd agree with most of !!!!'s criticisms, and could add a few dozen of my own).

But, I still hope that I can buy one, it'll make a great engineering teaching airframe!

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Reply
Old 28th February 2007 | 16:30
  #30 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 768
Likes: 52
From: TBC
PC7 for sale here. I want that!!! Ejection seats, HUD, anti-g system, etc. One hell of a toy for a 'I-couldn't-join-the-RAF' type like myself. Are you allowed furniture removal on a civvy aircraft?

I shudder to think what the asking price is though

Ginger
Gingerbread Man is offline  
Reply
Old 28th February 2007 | 17:55
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: Livin de island life
I shudder to think what the asking price is though
Available in the US for between $1M and $2M, depending on spec, times etc.

Nice to travel in - good range with drop tanks and generous luggage space.
flyingfemme is offline  
Reply
Old 28th February 2007 | 18:24
  #32 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
Is the Pilatus pressurised?

Looks nice.
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 28th February 2007 | 19:47
  #33 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 768
Likes: 52
From: TBC
between $1M and $2M, depending on spec
That doesn't sound too unreasonable, in a relative sense. It's not like i'm going to go out and buy one now, but if I stumbled across an oil field, who knows?

(I'd probably become a victim of 'regime change' I suppose )

Ginger
Gingerbread Man is offline  
Reply
Old 28th February 2007 | 22:51
  #34 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 532
Likes: 2
From: UK
Genghis - did they ever mod the capton wiring? that stuff was an absolute nightmare for the Engineers.
RAFAT is offline  
Reply
Old 1st March 2007 | 07:28
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: Livin de island life
PC7s are not pressurised - you get to wear a bone dome and oxygen mask. Very Top Gun
flyingfemme is offline  
Reply
Old 1st March 2007 | 08:02
  #36 (permalink)  

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
From: 75N 16E
Available in the US for between $1M and $2M, depending on spec
I'd get a D-Jet in that case
englishal is offline  
Reply
Old 1st March 2007 | 10:01
  #37 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
I wonder what the oxygen system endurance is at FL250?

Most non-P piston planes have an o2 endurance (assuming say 3 people, FL250) substantially shorter than their fuel endurance. The sales brochure doesn't tell you this of course, yet they do base their speed figures on the FL250 TAS
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st March 2007 | 11:12
  #38 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
Genghis - did they ever mod the capton wiring? that stuff was an absolute nightmare for the Engineers.
Was the Tucano Capton wired? I can't recall ever hearing mention of it.


Incidentally the Tucano is also unpressurised with a helmet/mask system. My very vague memory thinks that on 100% O2 you had about 2 hours, but I could be miles out.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Reply
Old 1st March 2007 | 15:49
  #39 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 532
Likes: 2
From: UK
Yes it was Genghis. Additionally, a lot of the wiring looms were apparently fitted before the skin was, so cable replacement was at times impossible without returning the airframe to the Acceptance hangar at Scampton and removing the skin from the relevant areas! Some cables needed to be replaced as soon as the airframe arrived from Shorts as they were tie-wrapped too tightly causing a breakdown in the integrity of the cable. This was commonplace when it came to the co-axial cables feeding various avionics equipment.

I would assume that the Engineers ironed out these problems over time though so my level of interest remains high.
RAFAT is offline  
Reply
Old 1st March 2007 | 17:29
  #40 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
My involvement with the Tucano was primarily on handling qualities assessments, so I'm unsurprised I didn't know. But, a little surprising - not an aeroplane I'd have expected a major weight issue on, and it's not that plenty of other cost saving measures weren't made elsewhere on the aircraft!

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.