Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Sheffield airport finally to close?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Sheffield airport finally to close?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jan 2007, 08:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Retford, UK
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sheffield airport finally to close?

There is a thread in Airlines, Airports and routes, but thought would post here as well.

http://www.sheffieldtoday.net/ViewAr...icleID=1973838

Seems that Sheffield airport has lost the battle to stay open and will be redeveloped as yet more business park type property, even though there is masses of that in the area that is still empty.

A real shame that a city the size of Sheffield can lose its GA facility, with no easily accessible alternative.

Does anyone know more details or the timescale for closure?
MichaelJP59 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2007, 08:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,820
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Not just a shame it's bl...y disgusting, especially when as will inevitably happen, GA gets 'squeezed out' of DSA.
If Doncaster council had kept their own airport (near the racecourse) it would have made things a lot easier, and I bet one of the reasons they cited for closing it was the forthcoming development of Sheffield City, so as usual, the only winners will be the developers.
With Sheffield Utd being in the premiership, and many visiting teams now flying to away matches, surely City would be an asset to be proud of, not just another brownfield site to be developed on. (which is how it started).
chevvron is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2007, 11:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Yorkshire, UK
Age: 49
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Today's Word Of The Day: Lunacy

I've got some training there tomorrow so will see what the folks on the ground know. Watch this space...
UnkleAzazael is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2007, 12:17
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rural England, thank God.
Posts: 720
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Put all this together with the air space grab at Doncaster Maid Marion, and it is quite clear that Peel Holdings are very GA hostile. Bodes ill for Barton as well....

Skua
skua is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2007, 15:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Manchester
Age: 53
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have said it before, and I will say it again, not only Peel, but most (Note not ALL) big airfield owners are not interested in GA these days. We are a pain, only flying on good days, taking lots of resources to manage, and complaining when the landing fee goes over a fiver! Much better to get rid of them and develop. Either as a business or a site for building. This has to be a short sighted view, simply because where do these muppets think airline pilots come from. Although we have the colleges these days, there are still a lot of guys that are self funding and need GA to acheive the goal. First as a ppl student, and later as an instructor hours building.

If we drive GA out in this country then where will the airlines get the newbies from? But again, the ills of filthy commerce have taken over, to be fair this is a piece of prime development land that is currently used by a few, and not for the original intention that lay behind building it. From a commercial viewpoint it more then likely is costing a fortune. But do we need 1km of runway, all the lights all the hangars and so-on. Try cutting back a bit, most GA fields like Sandtoft and Caernarfon do very well. Why not EGSY?
cessna l plate is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2007, 16:45
  #6 (permalink)  

Ich bin ein Prooner.
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Home of the Full Monty.
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am ashamed to admit that I live in the city. The Council could have kicked Peel into shape if they wanted, but instead have adopted the usual head-in-a-bucket-of-coal attitude that them aiport thingies aren't for the likes of us.
Absolutely ashamed! A total set of
Noah Zark. is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2007, 19:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Norf
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hang on, wasn't the original plan to remove part of the runway for industrial development, and keep a section (c600m) for GA and helicopters? Or was that always just a red herring?
The other thread is here.
jarvis123 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2007, 21:15
  #8 (permalink)  

Better red than ...
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Appleby-in-Westmorland Cumbria England
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the last airside safety meeting in December I asked the Airport Manager (Thomasson) about the issue of the airports commercial longevity and he stated that:-
1. The land at the 28 side of the tower is greenbelt and could not be developed (includes hangers/ ramp/ quite a bit of runway)
2. Land at the 10 end was brownfield and could be developed
3. "There will still be aviation at Sheffield City Airport"
h-r
helicopter-redeye is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2007, 23:08
  #9 (permalink)  
niknak
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
Not just a shame it's bl...y disgusting, especially when as will inevitably happen, GA gets 'squeezed out' of DSA.
If Doncaster council had kept their own airport (near the racecourse) it would have made things a lot easier, and I bet one of the reasons they cited for closing it was the forthcoming development of Sheffield City, so as usual, the only winners will be the developers.
With Sheffield Utd being in the premiership, and many visiting teams now flying to away matches, surely City would be an asset to be proud of, not just another brownfield site to be developed on. (which is how it started).
The reason Donny Council shut Doncaster Airfield was to build a leisure centre on the land and to expand the racecourse facilities - both of which gave a far better return and more facilities to the ratepayers of Doncaster than a piddling little airfield of no consequence.
Doncaster Aero Club had ample opportunity to move to a number of sites, Sandoft being one of them, but flying club commitees being what they are, they couldnt agree which day of the week it was, never mind what was best for the members - consequently they closed down.
Many of you seem to not know or conveniently forget the origins of Sheffield City Airport - Budge Mining Developed it out of an enormous slag heap which was a consequence of an adjacent mining enterprise. Thereafter, through the work of Sheffield City Council, millions of £s in EEC grants were obtained to develop it.
Subsequently it was supported by the ratepayers of Sheffield and Yorkshire until Peel came along and offered to run it at their own expense for a fixed term period.
Everyone in in Sheffield and the local authority knew that this coincided with their investment and opening date of Robin Hood, thereafter Sheffield City Airport would return to the ownership of the Sheffield City Council.
Why should the tax/rate payers support an airport which has no prospect of ever giving them, or has been very well proven, never given any of the operators who have ever operated from there, a viable service or return?
niknak is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2007, 16:23
  #10 (permalink)  

Better red than ...
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Appleby-in-Westmorland Cumbria England
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is the official word from Peel House 17.22hrs today (UTC)

On behalf of David Ryall, Airport Director.

The decision taken by Sheffield City Council to grant consent for the Blue Skies Planning Application will allow the Airport Company to consider the timing that the planning approval will be actioned. That decision has not been made, but when it is taken, it will be shared with all base operators/owners and as much prior notice as practicable will be given.
Remember Sir Humphrey? If you want to know you must ask the MInister ...
helicopter-redeye is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2007, 21:14
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MDH
Age: 32
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
whose the minister?
Saw him a week ago touring the airport doesnt look good i am afraid,
Hangar_9 is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2007, 22:38
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Age: 54
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This has been on the cards since day 1. Has anybody ever tried making a go of sheffield or just using it as a backdoor to yet more trading estates or as they put it alternate use of the land.
See here

If, as expected, the operator could demonstrate in 2007 that the Airport was loss making, the Council was obliged under the Lease to allow the transfer of the freehold of land for £1 and the alternative use of the site, subject to planning approval.
The rest can be found Here Minutes of a Meeting of the Council held on Wednesday 4th May 2005
100LL is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2007, 20:13
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Yorkshire, UK
Age: 49
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've had a word with a couple of people based at Sheffield and as far as they know we're looking at about three years. Profitability and Politics aside, it is indeed a big shame. I've done most of my training there and will be genuinely sorry to see it go
UnkleAzazael is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.