For all you lovers of red tape
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For all you lovers of red tape
By yacht to the CIs
GAR - no
Advance notification of customs - no
Q flag - yes, but no one bothers
Designated port - no
Booking out - no
Yellow jackets - no
Flight plan - no
Security - no
NOTAMS - yes, but very few bother
Separation from commercial craft - no
Designated commercial routes, danger and prohibited areas - not really
License - no
(Hope I have got those right, happy to be corrected)
By aircraft
GAR - yes
Customs notification - yes
Q flag - surely yes if only aircraft had flag poles
Designated port - ideally
Booking out - yes
Yellow jackets - of course
Flight plan - definitely
Security - almost certainly
NOTAMS - of course
Separation from commercial craft -yes, unless IR
Designated commercial routes, danger and prohibited areas - naturally
License - yes and renewal
Makes you wonder,
1. Which has the greater ability to carry loads of terrorists, illegal contraband, illegal immigrants and whatever else takes your fancy,
2. Which has greater opportunity to sneak into "port".
Seems to me the yachties have got it right, but where did we go wrong
.
Where did it all go wrong?
Pass me that sheet
.
GAR - no
Advance notification of customs - no
Q flag - yes, but no one bothers
Designated port - no
Booking out - no
Yellow jackets - no
Flight plan - no
Security - no
NOTAMS - yes, but very few bother
Separation from commercial craft - no
Designated commercial routes, danger and prohibited areas - not really
License - no
(Hope I have got those right, happy to be corrected)
By aircraft
GAR - yes
Customs notification - yes
Q flag - surely yes if only aircraft had flag poles
Designated port - ideally
Booking out - yes
Yellow jackets - of course
Flight plan - definitely
Security - almost certainly
NOTAMS - of course
Separation from commercial craft -yes, unless IR
Designated commercial routes, danger and prohibited areas - naturally
License - yes and renewal
Makes you wonder,
1. Which has the greater ability to carry loads of terrorists, illegal contraband, illegal immigrants and whatever else takes your fancy,
2. Which has greater opportunity to sneak into "port".
Seems to me the yachties have got it right, but where did we go wrong
.Where did it all go wrong?
Pass me that sheet
.
Last edited by Fuji Abound; 13th Jan 2007 at 20:51. Reason: Spelling
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Air transport is tightly regulated because people are scared to death of crashing, so there is a strong emotional drive to doing everything possible, regardless of cost or even supporting evidence, to make flying safe.
GA operates in a completely different risk regime - more like a leisure activity - but has been caught up in the same extreme regulation because it's run by the same bunch of people as air transport.
In the end, it's all supported by job creation requirements. A "CAA" is a great gravy train, in every country.
There are great job creation schemes everywhere you look. Many start in Brussels. Many provide jobs for countless thousands of little men who would otherwise have no prospect of finding a job: ISO9000, ROHS, CE, you name it.
GA operates in a completely different risk regime - more like a leisure activity - but has been caught up in the same extreme regulation because it's run by the same bunch of people as air transport.
In the end, it's all supported by job creation requirements. A "CAA" is a great gravy train, in every country.
There are great job creation schemes everywhere you look. Many start in Brussels. Many provide jobs for countless thousands of little men who would otherwise have no prospect of finding a job: ISO9000, ROHS, CE, you name it.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Matelot Peter
.. .. .. the trouble is the things I mentioned have little if anything to do with flight safety.
Are we as pilots becoming infected with the same disease where anything to do with aviation is coupled with aircraft crashing into infant schools?
.. .. .. the trouble is the things I mentioned have little if anything to do with flight safety.
Are we as pilots becoming infected with the same disease where anything to do with aviation is coupled with aircraft crashing into infant schools?
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: France
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the disease has been thrust upon us, coupled with alarmist meeja reporting. And as IO540 said, minions respond to scaremongering with ever-increasing legislation under the guise of 'public safety.'
As Ray Winstone says in the cereal ad., We're adults. Just give us the facts. We'll decide for ourselves. But that world has long gone. Power has been wrested.
As Ray Winstone says in the cereal ad., We're adults. Just give us the facts. We'll decide for ourselves. But that world has long gone. Power has been wrested.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ooh arrgh land
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry to be a bore, but with my former Coastguard and RNLI employee hats on...
Would definately file a 'flight plan' with Her Majesty's Coastguard. That way when you sink the CG/RNLI/others know where to start looking!
Believe me, people bimbling around in boats with none of the above (skills or planning) are a MAJOR headache to the volunteers that have to turn out to render service.
I am not a fan of beauracracy by any stretch of the imagination, but good training and planning are vital!
I'll go now....
Would definately file a 'flight plan' with Her Majesty's Coastguard. That way when you sink the CG/RNLI/others know where to start looking!
Believe me, people bimbling around in boats with none of the above (skills or planning) are a MAJOR headache to the volunteers that have to turn out to render service.
I am not a fan of beauracracy by any stretch of the imagination, but good training and planning are vital!
I'll go now....
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There's also the rather compelling argument that your 12' dinghy hitting an oil tanker ain't going to hurt them wherever you hit them, but your light aircraft hitting an airborne 747 might bring it down.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would definately file a 'flight plan' with Her Majesty's Coastguard
Also, it doen't have to be a 12' dingy. It could be a 4000 ton cargo vessel...but I get your point
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Unless, that is, you want to use the radio, I thought??
So, bunch of amateurs in rented sailboat with very tired sails, crossing the channel at night, discover on leaving harbour that onboard radio navaids are all U/S, nobody on board with a radio licence ...
... hey, never mind, just pass as closely as possible under the stern of one supertanker in the hope of being clear of the lane before the next one gets you ...
... maybe there's a radar reflector on the top of the mast, maybe there isn't, I guess that's up to the boat owner rather than the renter ...
... and it's certainly true that on return to the UK you can tie up at the quay, offload all the booze, phone customs, then return to the boat and wait the two hours to see whether they can be bothered to turn up or not, your illegal passengers being long gone by then.
(OK, I exaggerate slightly, there were a couple of people with Yachtmaster's aboard, it may have been just me that had never previously been in charge of anything larger than a Wayfarer.)
So, bunch of amateurs in rented sailboat with very tired sails, crossing the channel at night, discover on leaving harbour that onboard radio navaids are all U/S, nobody on board with a radio licence ...
... hey, never mind, just pass as closely as possible under the stern of one supertanker in the hope of being clear of the lane before the next one gets you ...
... maybe there's a radar reflector on the top of the mast, maybe there isn't, I guess that's up to the boat owner rather than the renter ...
... and it's certainly true that on return to the UK you can tie up at the quay, offload all the booze, phone customs, then return to the boat and wait the two hours to see whether they can be bothered to turn up or not, your illegal passengers being long gone by then.
(OK, I exaggerate slightly, there were a couple of people with Yachtmaster's aboard, it may have been just me that had never previously been in charge of anything larger than a Wayfarer.)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ooh arrgh land
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aviation is more stringent wrt procedures and practice, helping to make it statistically the safest way to travel!.. so I believe. I am sure someone will correct me!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You've got to separate private and air-transport aviation before any meaningful discussion can take place.
The expectation of safety in the two is completely different.
There is very little evidence that the present "safety" regulation has any bearing on private flying safety, or lack of. If it did, then we would expect to see a good number of accidents which were caused by breaches of the regs, and that isn't the case. Yet we all know that technical breaches of the regs are common in the spamcan world.
Most accidents are pilot error. Yet pilot training is still right back in good ole WW2. And this is quite relevant to the one (and only) connection between GAT and CAT: the two crashing into each other. This is without doubt the biggest potential disaster, but very little is done about it apart from the establishment of CAS, but then pilots are taught outdated nav techniques so they often haven't got a clue where CAS is.
The expectation of safety in the two is completely different.
There is very little evidence that the present "safety" regulation has any bearing on private flying safety, or lack of. If it did, then we would expect to see a good number of accidents which were caused by breaches of the regs, and that isn't the case. Yet we all know that technical breaches of the regs are common in the spamcan world.
Most accidents are pilot error. Yet pilot training is still right back in good ole WW2. And this is quite relevant to the one (and only) connection between GAT and CAT: the two crashing into each other. This is without doubt the biggest potential disaster, but very little is done about it apart from the establishment of CAS, but then pilots are taught outdated nav techniques so they often haven't got a clue where CAS is.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes but the majority of the things I mention have little or nothing to do with in flight safety.
GAR - NSR
Advance notification of customs - NSR
Q flag - Not relevant to aviation
Designated port - NSR
Booking out - SR, but the only risk to yourself and passengeres just as on a yacht
Yellow jackets - NSR, unproven ground safety
Flight plan - NSR or dubious value or as booking out
Security - Of no value to private flights
NOTAMS - SR as much for yachts as aircraft
Separation from commercial craft - SR but unproven
Designated commercial routes, danger and prohibited areas - See above
License - SR
(NSR not safety related)
I was asking if all this paranoia about aviation breeds a culture that cannot distinguish between useful purpose and regulation for regulations sake. It is interesting that a lot of the comments are about the safety related aspect whereas very few of the items I identified have anything to do with safety. Are we as pilots just as much guilty of going along with it because we can no longer identify those regulations which are for our and everyone else’s safety and those which serve some other purpose.
My point was that pleaseure craft are given a great deal of freedom in how, when and where thay can come and in particular come and go to and from Europe and the CIs whereas pilots (who in theory are more accountable) are given far less freedom. Moreover there capacity to do harm (in terms of contraband, people trafficking, etc) is less than for private vessels.
Hence my question, where did it all go so badly wrong?
GAR - NSR
Advance notification of customs - NSR
Q flag - Not relevant to aviation
Designated port - NSR
Booking out - SR, but the only risk to yourself and passengeres just as on a yacht
Yellow jackets - NSR, unproven ground safety
Flight plan - NSR or dubious value or as booking out
Security - Of no value to private flights
NOTAMS - SR as much for yachts as aircraft
Separation from commercial craft - SR but unproven
Designated commercial routes, danger and prohibited areas - See above
License - SR
(NSR not safety related)
I was asking if all this paranoia about aviation breeds a culture that cannot distinguish between useful purpose and regulation for regulations sake. It is interesting that a lot of the comments are about the safety related aspect whereas very few of the items I identified have anything to do with safety. Are we as pilots just as much guilty of going along with it because we can no longer identify those regulations which are for our and everyone else’s safety and those which serve some other purpose.
My point was that pleaseure craft are given a great deal of freedom in how, when and where thay can come and in particular come and go to and from Europe and the CIs whereas pilots (who in theory are more accountable) are given far less freedom. Moreover there capacity to do harm (in terms of contraband, people trafficking, etc) is less than for private vessels.
Hence my question, where did it all go so badly wrong?
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Perhaps we should get our facts correct. As a keen sailor I wouldn't expect to fill out a GAR (the 'A' standing for Aviation) but I follow the rules contained in Notice No. 8 - Sailing your pleasurecraft to and from the United Kingdom, which states that if sailing to a non-EU place (which the Channel Islands were when I last looked) I fill in a form (C1331 I think) and on return I have to phone number and sign and date the 2nd copy of my form. Whilst I appreciate that this is less than I have to do when flying , I have also been intercepted whilst underway by a Customs patrol boat, bit more difficult when you're flying !!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Because we let it happen by moaning about things on internet forums and expecting that "somebody" else will come along and fight our corner for us. Somebody else came along, then somebody else and somebody else. But none of these somebody elses could agree on a common theme so they were just walked all over.
As long as we expect all these somebody elses to act on our behalf we will just keep on having our rights eroded. Ultimately we will be legislated out of existance.
As long as we keep burying our heads in the sand on things like Mode S and carrying a radio, bleating about cost and that we never go anywhere near CAS. The fact is that eventually everywhere will be covered in CAS and suddenly somebody elses problem becomes yours, but then we are to far down the road to do anything about it.
As long as we teach an outdated curriculum and ignore advances in technology pilots will keep on infringing airspace, just giving the doom bringers more reason to expand CAS and legistlate the little man out.
Shall I keep going?
As long as we expect all these somebody elses to act on our behalf we will just keep on having our rights eroded. Ultimately we will be legislated out of existance.
As long as we keep burying our heads in the sand on things like Mode S and carrying a radio, bleating about cost and that we never go anywhere near CAS. The fact is that eventually everywhere will be covered in CAS and suddenly somebody elses problem becomes yours, but then we are to far down the road to do anything about it.
As long as we teach an outdated curriculum and ignore advances in technology pilots will keep on infringing airspace, just giving the doom bringers more reason to expand CAS and legistlate the little man out.
Shall I keep going?
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The one thing which would have made the biggest difference by far would have been if a load of rich and influential people, and politicians, flew in GA planes.
They do in the USA, and look at the representation which GA has out there.
Rich and powerful people fly in bizjets, which is why bizjets can't be touched - anywhere in the world.
They do in the USA, and look at the representation which GA has out there.
Rich and powerful people fly in bizjets, which is why bizjets can't be touched - anywhere in the world.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ifonly
yes, but my point exactly. You use words "as a keen sailor" and "I think" it is form etc. Yet you probably also know that few file whereas in aviation nearly everyone seems to know they have to do a GAR, know the form is a GAR and do file the form!
Staying on this point specifically, C1331 only has to be delivered BEFORE you go (it doesnt matter when) and then only to a customs post box which many marinas have. Yet with GA it has to go within the prescribed time and how many customs boxes have you seen at most airports.
I just find myself asking why? I think Bose-X is right - we all let it happen, but why do we? Or does it not matter? Do most of us find it a hassle, or not?
Personally, I have got it down to a bit of an art form so for a spur of the moment trip to L2K it is:
1. Email L2K - you have to becasue the NOTAM says so, (who knows whether or not they get it, they never reply, and the NOTAM fortunately doesnt ask you to check),
2. GAR on the fax, but if I didnt have a fax talk to FBO nicely,
3. Phone through FP, becuase I am already in the car by then and I dont want to hang around when I get there wiating for it to be activated,
Of course I couldnt go to the CIs because I would have to think about that the day before! I aslo couldnt go direct to most airports in France because there is no Customs. There would be even more complications and delays if I went airways.
In a yacht I can go to any port I like, I can linger in a quite little moring off Jersey if I wish, all I have to do is post of 1331 at the marina and go. Jersey told me a while back to get the Q flag down quick - we dont want any of that here, just causes extra hassle..
Maybe IO is right, there are plenty of very wealthy yachties, even an XPM.
There is also a ROYAL association, maybe we need a Royal Flying Association!!
yes, but my point exactly. You use words "as a keen sailor" and "I think" it is form etc. Yet you probably also know that few file whereas in aviation nearly everyone seems to know they have to do a GAR, know the form is a GAR and do file the form!
Staying on this point specifically, C1331 only has to be delivered BEFORE you go (it doesnt matter when) and then only to a customs post box which many marinas have. Yet with GA it has to go within the prescribed time and how many customs boxes have you seen at most airports.
I just find myself asking why? I think Bose-X is right - we all let it happen, but why do we? Or does it not matter? Do most of us find it a hassle, or not?
Personally, I have got it down to a bit of an art form so for a spur of the moment trip to L2K it is:
1. Email L2K - you have to becasue the NOTAM says so, (who knows whether or not they get it, they never reply, and the NOTAM fortunately doesnt ask you to check),
2. GAR on the fax, but if I didnt have a fax talk to FBO nicely,
3. Phone through FP, becuase I am already in the car by then and I dont want to hang around when I get there wiating for it to be activated,
Of course I couldnt go to the CIs because I would have to think about that the day before! I aslo couldnt go direct to most airports in France because there is no Customs. There would be even more complications and delays if I went airways.
In a yacht I can go to any port I like, I can linger in a quite little moring off Jersey if I wish, all I have to do is post of 1331 at the marina and go. Jersey told me a while back to get the Q flag down quick - we dont want any of that here, just causes extra hassle.
.Maybe IO is right, there are plenty of very wealthy yachties, even an XPM.
There is also a ROYAL association, maybe we need a Royal Flying Association!!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think more to the point is that for mariners there is the RYA and... not much else really. They have a single voice.
We have.. actually I have no idea. The ones that spring to mind are AOPA, GAPAN, BALPA, BGA, PFA. Are there more? Do they all agree on the issues? Which ones have the governments ear and which ones can we consider actually speak for us? Are they the same ones? Which one(s) should I belong to?