moving a/c by road ?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
moving a/c by road ?
I wonder, how do people transport a/c by road, if the wings are not removable ?, obviously, a wide load transporter could be used, but an expensive option, ?
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know of a light aircraft that can't have the wings removed, Aircraft like the DR400 have a "one piece" wing so are a little more trouble to move but this is usualy from a loading point of view.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Norfolk, England
Age: 58
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As others have said, all aircraft can usually have their wings removed. I've not yet come across on that can't but if one existed I suppose it could be stood on its nose on a low loader .... Just watch out for low bridges 
SS
SS
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sir Pratt
The DR400 wing structure is a 28 ft long "box spar" that in effect the fuselarge sits on and is secured to with three bolts and two straps.
It is the simplicity of the structure that keeps the weight down and gives the DR400 one of the best payloads in the business.
It is the simplicity of the structure that keeps the weight down and gives the DR400 one of the best payloads in the business.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
got to and from the NEC show, the wing removal was the obvious answer
however I wondered about other a/c who's wings seemed more permenant
riveted etc.
My mate then said, why not drain the fluids, remove the prop, and stand it
nose up !, after laughing for a while, I wondered ???
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The original SR20 Cirrus wing was bonded on to the fuselage so if it landed in a field (by normal means or beneath its parachute) it would be a game to recover. Having said that, if the BRS system had been used, the chances are it was pretty much written off when it came back to earth...
Most light aircraft are 25 ft plus long so standing it on the nose is going to play havoc with the bridges!
Cessna singles are a lot easier to move by road than Pipers which fall over when you take the wings off because of where the undercarriage attaches. That said the track on a 172 is around 8 ft which is more than your average flat bed. Tailplanes are 10 ft plus and to take the tailplane off you have to take the fin and rudder off etc etc.
There'll be alot of happy engineers now that Fly! London is Fly! Silverstone. An advantage of AeroExpo at Booker last year. Aircraft fly in, sit on a stand and fly out (even the diesel powered ones, although they weren't great at following the noise abatement turns on 06....).
Most light aircraft are 25 ft plus long so standing it on the nose is going to play havoc with the bridges!
Cessna singles are a lot easier to move by road than Pipers which fall over when you take the wings off because of where the undercarriage attaches. That said the track on a 172 is around 8 ft which is more than your average flat bed. Tailplanes are 10 ft plus and to take the tailplane off you have to take the fin and rudder off etc etc.
There'll be alot of happy engineers now that Fly! London is Fly! Silverstone. An advantage of AeroExpo at Booker last year. Aircraft fly in, sit on a stand and fly out (even the diesel powered ones, although they weren't great at following the noise abatement turns on 06....).
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the north
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have seen a photograph of Piper Cubs stored on their noses in the factory. Saved a lot of groundspace. (also have seen/used this method to clean underneath one - but would not think it ideal for travel unless well secured in some form of cradle)
