Minimum height requirements
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norfolk UK
Age: 81
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Minimum height requirements
I've always understood that the minimum height for UK flights in a light aircraft is 500 feet.
Reading "Beyond the PPL" by Nigel Everett I see that in fact we must not fly vertically or diagonally nearer than 500' to any person ,building or vessel,so if flying in the open countryside it would be OK to fly at say 200' as long as this requirement was respected.
Obviously noise could be an issue and should be taken into account.
I don't intend to blast around at zero feet but would like some more info on this,is all this correct?
Lister
Reading "Beyond the PPL" by Nigel Everett I see that in fact we must not fly vertically or diagonally nearer than 500' to any person ,building or vessel,so if flying in the open countryside it would be OK to fly at say 200' as long as this requirement was respected.
Obviously noise could be an issue and should be taken into account.
I don't intend to blast around at zero feet but would like some more info on this,is all this correct?
Lister
Last edited by Lister Noble; 28th Oct 2006 at 17:16.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sunny California
Age: 52
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep that's correct, 500' from any person,vessel,vehicle or structure.
I've flown PFLs down to (much) less than 200' - though if you startled a courting couple you could be in trouble.
I've flown PFLs down to (much) less than 200' - though if you startled a courting couple you could be in trouble.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The South
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mark
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Yes that's correct.
However as you typically can't actually see whether you're within 500' of a person (people get up to all sorts of things in the "open countryside", eg a courting couple deliberately hiding under a bush) this is effectively a minimum 500' height over land.
Over the sea, more than 500' from any boats or swimmers or whatever, you can go lower. But whilst you can fly one of those <== around quite happily at 100', and I have done, I wouldn't recommend it if you're wearing wheels - what happens when the fan stops?
However as you typically can't actually see whether you're within 500' of a person (people get up to all sorts of things in the "open countryside", eg a courting couple deliberately hiding under a bush) this is effectively a minimum 500' height over land.
Over the sea, more than 500' from any boats or swimmers or whatever, you can go lower. But whilst you can fly one of those <== around quite happily at 100', and I have done, I wouldn't recommend it if you're wearing wheels - what happens when the fan stops?
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
low flying
Re the "50 ft over the sea" bit, you would be guilty of endangering the aircraft and its occupants, because if the donk stopped there's no doubt you'd get wet.
Plenty of frowning there.
Plenty of frowning there.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
though if you startled a courting couple you could be in trouble
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: a galaxy far, far,away...
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not necessarily true. If the field has a fence, a fence is a structure. If the CAA has a need it will bring all guns to bear.
Some years ago "beat-ups" became a bit of an issue with folk flying fast and low down a runway. The CAA "advised" for the purposes of Rule 5 that a runway is a structure and unless you were landing/taking off/overshooting from a genuine approach you could be treading on thin ice.
Some years ago "beat-ups" became a bit of an issue with folk flying fast and low down a runway. The CAA "advised" for the purposes of Rule 5 that a runway is a structure and unless you were landing/taking off/overshooting from a genuine approach you could be treading on thin ice.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lister - when I zoom your house I do it with caution.
The 3:4:5 triangle plays a huge part - you see me whooosshing by at 300' from your property, I'm flying at 400' agl ERGO I must be clear of you. The very fact that you have a gorgeous house with no neighgbours makes it all legal.
Stik
The 3:4:5 triangle plays a huge part - you see me whooosshing by at 300' from your property, I'm flying at 400' agl ERGO I must be clear of you. The very fact that you have a gorgeous house with no neighgbours makes it all legal.
Stik
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has the "structure" bit ever been defined? There is a lot of fences around.
The real problem is nothing to do with legality: if you are at 500ft it is virtually certain that somebody will report you for low flying, and they probably can read the number plate. You will probably get away with it (any half decent lawyer will make the point that a layman cannot possibly judge height accurately) but that's not the point. GA has loads of enemies already.
The real problem is nothing to do with legality: if you are at 500ft it is virtually certain that somebody will report you for low flying, and they probably can read the number plate. You will probably get away with it (any half decent lawyer will make the point that a layman cannot possibly judge height accurately) but that's not the point. GA has loads of enemies already.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Worcs/Glos border
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What's the legal position with PFL's?
I have done, and continue to do, plenty of these, and to be useful it's necessary to pick a field quickly, and descend to 100' or so before departing again. In most areas that will inevitably take you closer than 500' however considerate you try to be, specially if we count fences as structures.
Does the CAA ever prosecute pilots for doing a PFL?
I have done, and continue to do, plenty of these, and to be useful it's necessary to pick a field quickly, and descend to 100' or so before departing again. In most areas that will inevitably take you closer than 500' however considerate you try to be, specially if we count fences as structures.
Does the CAA ever prosecute pilots for doing a PFL?
Yes. IIRC, there was a case a number of years ago when the CAA prosecuted a pilot for violating the 1500 ft rule over East Hanningfield in Essex while carrying out what was undisputedly a bona fide PFL. After conviction in the magistrates court the case was appealed to the Crown Court, which threw out the charge on the basis that the prosecution had proved neither that East Hanningfield was a "congested area" nor that the pilot actually flew over it.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norfolk UK
Age: 81
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The aircraft I fly does not have any normal CA markings as it is in US Army military colours ,but that's not the point.
I was really questioning the legality of flying below 500 feet if not nearer than 500 feet to any structure,people etc.
Reading the replies it appears that bearing the 500' rule in mind, it is legal to fly at any height in open countryside especially if over friends farms where there are no footpaths,houses etc.
Lister
I was really questioning the legality of flying below 500 feet if not nearer than 500 feet to any structure,people etc.
Reading the replies it appears that bearing the 500' rule in mind, it is legal to fly at any height in open countryside especially if over friends farms where there are no footpaths,houses etc.
Lister
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
"DEAD SLOW"
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norfolk UK
Age: 81
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Got it up to 1000' today but very,very scary!
Actually had a marvellous time checking out pals farms and airstrips,although not landing there this time
Lister
Actually had a marvellous time checking out pals farms and airstrips,although not landing there this time
Lister
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hope you are enjoying the Cub Lister. Be careful on your touch and goes because the climb out on a hot day, 2 up can be interesting !
New Zealand is pretty demanding too ! - I am flying a Cub out here now and all my L4 time is standing me in good stead !
regards and take care
Arc
New Zealand is pretty demanding too ! - I am flying a Cub out here now and all my L4 time is standing me in good stead !
regards and take care
Arc