Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

6 weeks enough for PPL

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

6 weeks enough for PPL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Oct 2006, 08:06
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maders UK
Age: 57
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my haypenny's worth!

My dad did UK PPL 20 years or so ago and it took him over a year flying out of a muddy field in the North UK. Weather, lesson scheduling, his job and aircraft downtime were all to blame but he persevered and finished his license.

At 76 he still flies and enjoys every second of it, now on NPPL rather than PPL due to less stringent medical requirements.

In 1994 I had 2 weeks free between jobs and travelled to Van Nuys CA to do the FAA ASEL the intensive way.
I had done the ground stuff in 2 weekends prior to going at Bristol Airport with the excellent Rory O'Carrol of American Aviation Services and got the theory test out of the way the day I arrived.
Accomodation (nice condo with pool which I didn't see much of), airport transfers and exam costs were thrown in to the package.
Took me 50 or so hours (day and night) some hours flying 6-9 hrs per day in a little C150 to get up to speed.
Soloed day 5, license in hand day 14, back to blighty day 15. Job done.
I have only vague recollections of how much it cost - but it was approx 50% of what my dad paid (including all the extras).

Of course at that time 9/11 had not happened and the immigration/visa side was more straightforward.

Was I safe when I returned?
IMHO as safe as any person who had spent the same amount of time flying in the UK. In addition to this I had had to cross the Sierra Nevada in a C150 in turbulence and strong winds at 10,500 ft on my solo cross country, show me a UK PPL student who has ever had to lean the engine? Also the 5 hrs of night was excellent fun and great experience, popping the lights on at some far flung airport by clicking 7 times on the PCL frequency and then landing was such a hoot.
Is intensive training better?
For me, yes without a doubt, I didn't get a chance to forget anything I had learned the day before!

The biggest downer on returning to the UK (other than the bloody awful weather) was my new FAA license being met with patronising glances and raised eyebrows by individuals whose (rustbucket) club aircraft I attempted to rent. The general attitude was "How dare I be so young and have an American ticket - surely I must be a worse pilot for not having learned in the UK?" I visited several flying clubs prior to settling on doing a conversion to PA-28 at modern air in Fowlmere with the excellent Kevin Ambrose-Hunt.

Since that time I have added an FAA IR (2000), CAA PPL(H) and owned (outright) a total of 4 aircraft (2 fixed wing and 2 helicopters).

I have now accrued almost 1000hrs fixed wing and 600hrs rotary.
I fly on an almost daily basis throughout the year and use aviation to commute to the places I work (weather permitting).

I have no regrets about going the FAA fixed wing route.

It was far cheaper back then and most importantly (for me) allowed me to get the license (which like any other license is just a license to learn) in a convenient way.

It doesn't matter one iota where you do your basic training - which all has to be done in VMC anyway. Clouds in the US are just the same as clouds in the UK (although somewhat less endemic) and entering them is not allowed if you are a student pilot in either jurisdiction.

Where you learn to fly is an individual choice - you could be lining up after a departing citation jet or 737 (having had to get the ATIS then speak to clearance delivery, ground and tower) at one of the busiest airports in the world or walking across a muddy field with soggy shoes and damp socks to climb into an aircraft that is so damp that the avionics are dodgy even in the summer. (The former scenario will ensure far better radio patter when you do eventuall fly into somewhere big)

The most important thing is recognising that just like a driving license having a pilot's license does not necessarily confer good judgement skills. These come with experience which can only be gained with time.

Here endeth the sermon according to Scooter Boy.
scooter boy is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2006, 09:15
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excellent post, SB

Of course you (like me) are one of those who went "all the way" afterwards.
IO540 is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2006, 15:10
  #23 (permalink)  
LH2
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Abroad
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll just throw my usual twopence in and mention the place where I did my training. Got through it all in less than three weeks, including theory, cheaper than the UK, no visas, and only a Ryanair flight away from Britain. Oh, and not only I've got me a licence... I can actually fly

I don't have anything to do with the guys above btw, other than being a satisfied customer. Hope this helped.

/LH2
LH2 is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2006, 16:12
  #24 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good post ScooterBoy.....

I would tend to slightly disagree with IO for once All my tickets and ratings were done as a holiday (PPL 5 weeks, IR 5 weeks, CPL 10 weeks - I took it easy). During the IR we toured right around California, Nevada and Arizona as at the time we were short of XC time. Had a ball.

My CPL QXC was to Sedona, followed by Laughlin in Nevada for some over night gambling (I lost ) then into Big Bear for some snowball fights in shorts and again had a great time. It was never a drag "having" to go out there I used to carry out the CPL VFR manouvres over Catalina Island, and then land for a buffalo burger afterwards. I Lazy-8'd all the way back one day

So it is personnal choice, it IS cheaper in the USA, and a different way of training but IMO just as good as the UK. I returned to the UK and had no problem adjusting and now own a G reg plane and enjoy flying there just as much, but in a different way.
englishal is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2006, 16:38
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At 20 weeks, Englishal, I should jolly well hope you had a holiday

The Spanish option is definitely worth looking at. Good weather, hopefully.

But I would still ensure I really never want to do the FAA stuff...
IO540 is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2006, 19:19
  #26 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah but you know me, lounging around for half the year :-)

I could have done them quicker but at the time I was working towards my CFI/II/MEI tickets..so decided to have a few adventures. I didn't do the FI tickets in the end, I thought I better leave something for the future, along with the G V type rating
englishal is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2006, 14:28
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bordeaux
Age: 40
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Everyone,

Thanks for your comments, i am trying to do it in 6 weeks as i can not have unpaid leave, if i want any chance at trying to get leave granted 6 weeks could be feasible without taking the mick. I just dont know whether to do the initial PPL in the USA or somewhere in southern europe. For example the flying club FLY-IN-SPAIN in Jerez.
I will try to do my theory before i leave, seen as im living in France i may need to complete it in French. I already go to a flying school and i have 5hrs of flight which all counts.
I just need to fully complete it next year around April / May so i can go on the distance learning ATPL course so i can stay in employment before i do the CPL.
Also, Needing to get my Class 1 medial, i already have my Class 2 from the French authorities. So now i want to get my Class 1, to make sure that i am medically fit to even persue this career. I guess if i want to do this in english i need to get myself over to either the UK or Ireland.

Anymore help would be great, thanks for the support all.

Frank
cityjet is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2006, 16:03
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Granted it won't be a JAA PPL, but you can still fly here just fine on an ICAO PPL with no restrictions providing you stay within the UK.
Not quite true about no restrictions from what I understand - SA licence is type specific, so if you learn on a C150 then want to fly on a PA28 or something else then you need to be signed off for it by a SA approved instructor (I believe Irv Lee can do this).
foxmoth is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2006, 09:21
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6 weeks should be more than enought to get your PPL done. I got through mine in 4 wks (even though I had to split into 2 x 2wk stints due to work refusing to give me a block of 4 wks off!).

My one thing, which I have said before, is make sure that you have all the written exams complete before you go. I was flying approx 4 hours a day and being able to relax at night was great, other locked themselves in their rooms and were cramming hard. Its a big bonus card to hold.

I have noticed the cost steadily rising since I completed my PPL about 5 or so years ago however I still think that the cost are cheaper. The other big plus I have found is that schools over there, at least in my experience, tend to have newer and better equpipied and not to mention more aircraft for students to use. My experience of the UK flying school scene has been offputting to say the least.

I, for one, am a fan of the intensive training regime. Constant exposure to the flying environment day in day out improves your skills rather than letting them fester whilst you wait weeks since your last lesson for a break in the weather. This was certainly a big help when I completed my IR which again took about 2 wks and I think about 60hrs flying.

As IO and EA say, the places to visit whilst underatking your PPL are fantastic and you dont have to spend all day flying in circles round your airfield - make something of your trip!

J.
Julian is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2006, 09:40
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Craggy Island....the west is best
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6 week PPL

Hi,

I did mine in 2 weeks at Anglo American in California, but it was very tough and not overly enjoyable. Means doing exams every second day, early starts and late finishes. Anglo gave gr8 access to the aircraft though, and gave me my own instructor at no extra charge.
Would recommend the PA28. Four weeks would be more than enough.

Hope this helps

www.flyaaa.com

Last edited by 3bars; 30th Jan 2007 at 09:43.
3bars is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2006, 10:35
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Echo the comments above. I did mine in 3 weeks at Anglo, although I had 6 or the exams done beforehand. There were peole there who had 0 hrs and 0 exams and although they still managed it within the 4 weeks, they did put themselves under pressure to get those exams done.
Seagull61 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2006, 12:03
  #32 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I think it could be done in the UK in four weeks if needed, with exams out of the way beforehand. Checking my logbook I see that I flew 44 hours of the 80 hour RN Elementary course in Bulldogs out of Leeming/Topcliffe in June of 1979. Of these 7 were solo.

I flew on 19 days, and never on weekends or after 1700, except on Fridays, when we stacked at 1500....add on weekends and light evenings and you could quite easily get another 25% time I'd suggest. We also spent most of one week on nights flying only once each night.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2006, 16:28
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: bucks
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IO540

At the age of 58 it took me 49.1 hrs to get my PPL and cost £7,000 and I did it last year over a period of nine months, Feb to Oct at a school to the west of London.

Age may have some bearing, but I also beleive it is so much down to one's natural ability.

I was advised that when I started to learn, be consistant and fly at least two or three times a week, and always with the same instructor.

I did and it worked for me.

To return to the original thread, I too considered the US, and although I intend to use my licence purely for pleasure, I felt the additional cost was worth it as I flew in all types of weather some on the margins, which I doubt I would have done in the US.

Just to be able do fly in the UK's changeable weather and the busy airspace of the UK with confidence, has to worth the extra cost.

WF
Whiteflyer is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2006, 17:00
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well done whiteflyer, excellent sense
tangovictor is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2006, 20:09
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Whiteflyer

I felt the additional cost was worth it as I flew in all types of weather some on the margins, which I doubt I would have done in the US.

Just to be able do fly in the UK's changeable weather and the busy airspace of the UK with confidence, has to worth the extra cost.

WF
I unfortunately didn't feel the extra 3 grand was worth it. I don't know what weather in the UK you had was on the margins but in the US we regulary had 20-25 kt crosswinds, storms etc and Daytonas airspace is pretty busy, even some of the local airfields where they run left and right circuits simultaneously in busy times, I've been in Coventrys circuit where they wouldn't allow more than 2 at a time in, everyone else had to orbit some distance out.
mcgoo is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2006, 08:42
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the USA is your chosen route then its worth pointing out that you be careful where you do do you your PPL as regards weather.

I felt the additional cost was worth it as I flew in all types of weather some on the margins, which I doubt I would have done in the US.

Just to be able do fly in the UK's changeable weather and the busy airspace of the UK with confidence, has to worth the extra cost.
Despite popular conception, such as Whiteflyer, it is not all 30'c 356 day sun on the other side of the pond. This seems to be Florida weather, I did my IR in California and a vast majority of it was done in actual IMC. PPLs were grounded due to conditions and unable to fly, I would say they lost approx 4 days flying whilst I was there over 4 wks and also flights that were done in marginal weather.

I dare say if you moved inland towarsd Arizona/Nevada then weather would not be an issue again however not sure of which, if any, JAA schools lurk in these areas. The best known ones seem to be on the East coast with the odd one on the West.

J.
Julian is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2006, 09:06
  #37 (permalink)  
Irv
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Popham
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm often consulted on this sort of question, and wouldn't dream of saying 'do this' or 'do that' as a general answer as I've found every one asking has in some way individual circumstances. A number of questions need 'asking back' before answering, demonstrated in this post alone. At the start it appears to be a question about just getting a PPL, later more information comes in about living in France and also wanting to go 'ATPL', all of which may be relevant and mean some of the well intentioned answers earlier might have been different given the new facts - for example, the intention is probably not to fly UK based N reg aircraft so any foreign I/R could easily cut the cost to a JAA I/R.
If consulted about getting to the commercial flight deck via foreign or UK routes, I usually just lay out the basic routes either 'direct' or via JAA PPL or ICAO PPL, if the latter, do you then go into JAA CPL or foreign CPL/IR first then convert? I wrote a document for people wanting to know the options to Euro airline interviews via S Africa and conversion and it is equally valid for routes FAA, NZ or anywhere. There's no 'advertising' in it, just information on various licence routes to end at the same point. I'll send citylink a link to it.
It's a difficult subject sometimes and it really comes down to personal choice with sometimes surprising results- the last person to ask me was going for just a PPL, was considering all countries, and eventually knowingly chose the (in my opinion) most risky path to getting what he wanted in the time he wanted. It seemed obvious in his paticular circumstances (which were not standard) that the Jerez route mentioned above was almost perfect with all the best safety nets, but given all the information, he eventually knowingly chose a SA school with no known track record with UK students. I'll be interested to hear the 'result' when he gets back. If he gets a SA PPL then he will be type rated, but he's gone into it knowing that. He knows what he wants to fly when he gets back and it was no doubt built in to his decision.
On that topic, SA PPLs are not confined to the UK. The automatic validation in the ANO is not 'UK airspace' limited, so I checked with the French CAA (which is where most want to go) and they confirmed if an ICAO licence is acceptable to the UK CAA in G reg aircraft (ie: 'validated'), and there are no home country rules preventing its use, then it's welcome in France in the G reg. In the same way, they would expect any foreign ICAO pilot that they had 'validated' in F aircraft to be welcome in one anywhere. This is how validations work worldwide.

Last edited by Irv; 1st Nov 2006 at 09:18.
Irv is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2006, 11:45
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Africa
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by foxmoth
Not quite true about no restrictions from what I understand - SA licence is type specific, so if you learn on a C150 then want to fly on a PA28 or something else then you need to be signed off for it by a SA approved instructor (I believe Irv Lee can do this).
SA CAA has just released the final draft of their Part 61 regulating pilots licensing. This is out for final comment before being promulgated. In term of the new Part 61 there will be a single licence for single engined aircraft under 5700kg.
We are really looking forward to these changes.
Tiger Bob is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2006, 20:23
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did my PPL in summer 2005 over a 26 day period flying two srties a day. Did the ground exams in the UK before I flew out.

Thoroughly enjoyed my self. Went solo after 10 days, 220 mile solo x-country on day 20 then did my skills test on day 26. All done in a 4 week holiday to sunny California.

Managed to accumulate 55 hours flying in total. Highly recomended

JK
jakerr is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.