Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Is a CTA a "Zone"

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Is a CTA a "Zone"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Sep 2006, 05:07
  #1 (permalink)  

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is a CTA a "Zone"

If one wanted to transit Bournemouth at 3000, then one would be in Solents CTA. Would the request be a "Zone transit" to Solent?

Thanks...
englishal is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2006, 05:18
  #2 (permalink)  
London Mil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think you have answered your own question. Personally, I would ask for a CTA transit.
 
Old 12th Sep 2006, 10:13
  #3 (permalink)  

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks.....
englishal is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2006, 12:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: S Warwickshire
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would normally just make a request for a VFR(/IFR/SVFR) transit, without qualifying Zone or CTA.

It is quite likely that a transit will go through both, and a clearance will be issued to enter "controlled airspace".
I don't know what CAP413 says, but a controller is primarily interested in your altitude and routing through the controlled airspace as a whole.
Mark 1 is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2006, 16:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Not where I want to Be!!!!
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Becareful what point you wish to transit as you may be best calling Bournemouth.
northernboyo is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2006, 18:17
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: a galaxy far, far,away...
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Technically a zone is from sfc to a specified level eg sfc-2000. An area is from one specified level to another eg 2000-5000.

Realistically no-one's going to stand on semantics. I hope!
aluminium persuader is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2006, 23:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The world's most liveable city
Posts: 245
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark 1
I would normally just make a request for a VFR(/IFR/SVFR) transit, without qualifying Zone or CTA.
It is quite likely that a transit will go through both, and a clearance will be issued to enter "controlled airspace".
I don't know what CAP413 says, but a controller is primarily interested in your altitude and routing through the controlled airspace as a whole.
But you won't get a SVFR clearance through a CTA!!
RAC/OPS is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 05:07
  #8 (permalink)  
London Mil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RAC/OPS you are quite correct. However, it is one of those rules I have never quite understood. What is the difference between a SVFR clearance through a CTR and one through a CTA with a base level of 1500ft?
 
Old 13th Sep 2006, 06:18
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Apa, apo ndi kulikonse!
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because your clearance would be "Not above" (say 2000ft) and if the CTA base was 1500ft you are likely not to be in the CTA!

And the ANO defines SVFR as clearance through a zone (not all CTAs are piddly little things of course)

All semantics as said really...... damn them rules!
AlanM is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 07:08
  #10 (permalink)  

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Becareful what point you wish to transit as you may be best calling Bournemouth.
This is why I am confused. In the past when holding over the BIA at FL50 I was talking to Bournemouth.

However, now I fly from somewhere else, and if routing to the Channel Islands via NEDUL / ORTAC the easiest option for me (other than skirting their airspace) is to climb to 3000 (to remain below N866) and transit Bournemouth from say Tarrent Rushton to Hengistbury Head and intercept the SAM radial (I forget which one).

As mentioned, a CTA is not a zone, and CAP413 doesn't clarify. If my initial call is for "zone transit" they may assume straight away that I want to transit their Zone which I don't.

If I were to go now, I'd call Solent and ask "to transit their airspace" or "CTA transit". I imagine I'd be told to call Bournemouth anyway, but it is only polite to call the agency listed on the chart
englishal is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 07:14
  #11 (permalink)  
London Mil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Alan, I'm not disagreeing, but I don't find any link in the ANO between SVFR and it only being available in a CTR. Conversely, the AIP is quite specific and talks only about CTRs. Taking this a step further, the only weather criteria I can find for SVFR refer to in-flight visibility and not contact with the surface (as I am thinking about CTR/CTA transits, I am ignoring to 600ft cloudbase bit for arrivals and departure here). To confuse the issue the AIP says the following:

2.3 When operating on a Special VFR clearance, the pilot must comply with ATC instructions and remain at all times in flight conditions which enable him to determine his flight path and to keep clear of obstacles. Therefore, it is implicit in all Special VFR clearances that the aircraft remains clear of cloud and in sight of the surface. It may be necessary for ATC purposes to impose a height limitation on a Special VFR clearance which will require the pilot to fly either at or not above a specific level.
Note that in sight of the surface bit is "implicit", whatever that means! I can quite happily determine my position and maintain obstacle clearance without seeing the surface. Indeed, I have often offered to take an IFR clearance only to be given a VFR/SVFR one.

As I see things, in theory, you can have a SVFR clearance above cloud through a CTR but not a CTA.

I think I will take a cold flannel and lie down in a dark room now.
 
Old 13th Sep 2006, 08:58
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Apa, apo ndi kulikonse!
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SVFR

"A flight made at any time in a control zone which is Class A airspace, or in any other control zone in IMC or at night, in respect of which the appropriate air traffic control unit has given permission for the flight to be made in accordance with special instructions given by that unit instead of in accordance with the Instrument Flight Rules and in the course of which flight the aircraft complies with any instructions given by that unit and remains clear of cloud and in sight of the surface. (R of A)"
AlanM is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 09:31
  #13 (permalink)  
London Mil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
AlanM, ta. Still doesn't make complete sense though. Why does the AIP use the word "implicit" if the ANO requires COCIS?

I think I will go back to my dark room.
 
Old 13th Sep 2006, 11:29
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think technically you ask for a area transit, but I've asked for one myself or ever heard anyone ask. In the real world you ask for a zone transit and everyone knows what you mean.
spikeair is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 13:59
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 50+ north
Posts: 1,254
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Although you will not find any reference to it in the Air Pilot or NOTAMs, I understand that Solent delegate control of the Solent CTA overhead Bournemouth and west thereof to Bournemouth, So it would appear that you shouls call Bournemouth for a crossing.
TCAS FAN is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.