Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

'Outside my limits'


Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

'Outside my limits'

Old 9th August 2006 | 14:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Recidivist
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
From: Essex, UK
'Outside my limits'

I heard what seemed like a strange one a few days ago.

Aircraft (type unknown) approaching Southend, advised 'Clear to land 06, surface wind 080 degrees, 08 knots'. Visibility was good.

Response was 'That's outside my limits, returning to Biggin'.

What on earth couldn't handle those conditions?
frostbite is offline  
Old 9th August 2006 | 15:06
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Sussex, UK
Me !!!

Lol
oliversarmy is offline  
Old 12th August 2006 | 12:46
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: South East
Almost certainly outside the crosswind limits for a hot air balloon
lobby is offline  
Old 12th August 2006 | 12:51
  #4 (permalink)  
Administrator
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 8,121
Likes: 686
From: Twickenham, home of rugby
Maybe they were referring to the landing fee?

SD
Saab Dastard is offline  
Old 12th August 2006 | 13:05
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
From: Here and there. Here at the moment but soon I'll be there.
Maybe they were referring to Southend
SkyHawk-N is offline  
Old 12th August 2006 | 13:15
  #6 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What on earth couldn't handle those conditions?

Someof the older stuff from Old Warden, but unlikely it would be flying from Biggin.
 
Old 13th August 2006 | 08:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
From: n/a
Just a thought could it have been a larger jet positioning in for maint? Southend aint exactly huge and they could have required a minimum headwind component to make their performance calcs work?
Daysleeper is offline  
Old 13th August 2006 | 08:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
From: Tea green International
If it was X Biggin then not a BIG jet

Still no idea, but please can some one in ATC, put us out of our misery.
Bumz
Bumz_Rush is offline  
Old 13th August 2006 | 08:49
  #9 (permalink)  
sir.pratt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
a balloon was my first though, unless it was a ppl student on their first solo cross country and got the x-wind component mixed up, thought it was a downwind x-wind landing, and took the safe (to them) option
 
Old 13th August 2006 | 11:08
  #10 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: uk
I suspect that this was to do with landing distance. From memory I think that the landing distance available (LDA) for Southends runway 06 is around 100 metres or so shorter than 24. For some biz jets that will give a problem for public transport operations and they will need a fair headwind to get in legally. This problem is compounded by some aircraft now having a different landing distance requirement (LDR) depending on the glideslope angle with angles of 3.4 degrees or less requiring more runway than 3.5 degrees or more. 06 PAPIs are only set at 3.0deg whereas 24 ILS is 3.5 deg. Hope this helps.

Although not relevant to Southend, aircraft that are certified for steep approaches e.g. London City, which is 5.5 degrees, have yet another set of landing tables in which the LDR is shorter still.
rightbank is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.