Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Re: Base to Final Turn

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Re: Base to Final Turn

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st August 2006 | 11:51
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Buggleskelly
Photos are better than nothing but they do not give the history of the airfield.
Tim got me thinking there about these ex WW 2 airfields and there is a debt of repect owed to the part they all played in the war.
I wonder how many airfields actually have a history of their past somewhere where visitors can see it, I cannot remember ever flying into one that has. As this is off thread I will post a seperate thread in Private Flying.

I didnt start the Wellesbourne thing by the way it was 10540 who mentioned Stapleford and Wellesbourne as being a free for all in the circuit!
theresalwaysone is offline  
Old 1st August 2006 | 15:15
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: UK, right of centre
Back to the thread - we teach square circuits. although there are many advantages of oval, as discussed on this thread, for our high wing aircraft the view in the turn is poor/non existent for spotting aircraft and the runway and so we keep it to a minimum by making square circuits.
KK
Kaptain Kremen is offline  
Old 1st August 2006 | 16:18
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk UK
Old Buckenham has an excellent well kept exterior memorial to the missing US airmen and also some interesting WW2 photographs in the clubhouse.
Also do marvellous food,if you can manage the 16 oz 100% steak Mustang burger you are a better man than me!
Lister
Lister Noble is offline  
Old 11th August 2006 | 11:19
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: on my own planet
Originally Posted by Lister Noble
Old Buckenham has an excellent well kept exterior memorial to the missing US airmen and also some interesting WW2 photographs in the clubhouse.
Also do marvellous food,if you can manage the 16 oz 100% steak Mustang burger you are a better man than me!
Lister
Been planning to go there for a while!
Vifferpilot is offline  
Old 18th August 2006 | 00:53
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Way up north
The original posted question was re "two tightish 90-degree turns".

I'd say that overshooting the turn to final is worse. At such point one tends to forget about stall-speed ratio vs bank angle, eyes away from the panel while banking too steeply at low speed.

Never do that in a Cub.
Nardi Riviera is offline  
Old 18th August 2006 | 06:10
  #66 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,557
Likes: 95
From: moon
At the risk of getting flamed, are you considering the behavioural angle? A circuit with four legs at right angles neatly segments the workload and decision making into four phases with no overlap should you choose not to have any.

It also makes the traffic management (we do have six in the circuit on weekends, and since its parallel runways there are contra rotating circuits.) somewhat easier, especially with newer students.

I suggest that when the going gets slightly tough, like landing with a crosswind on an unfamiliar airstrip after a bumpy and long flight, the four phases of the circuit help to focus on the task at hand and hopefully not miss anything, especially for low time pilots like me.

I've made a few circular approaches ( gliding approaches) and while they are fun to do on a familiar field, I'm not so sure I'd like to try it in an unfamiliar location, like this one.

Sunfish is offline  
Old 18th August 2006 | 11:15
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 2
From: UK
Originally Posted by IO540
I think a lot of people forget that any radio operator below the rank of ATC has no authority to "clear" anybody anywhere (much as some like to pretend otherwise) and the pilot can do what he likes.
In the air, that's true. But a FISO has the authority to positively control traffic on the ground. Quite whether this includes controlling access to the runway or not seems unclear.
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 18th August 2006 | 13:00
  #68 (permalink)  
DubTrub
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quite clear to me, SSD:
From Lasors
A Flight Information Service
Officer is qualified to provide an
Aerodrome Flight Information
Service (AFIS) in order to:
• pass ‘Instructions’ ...to
aircraft on the ground but not
beyond the holding point and in the
case of aircraft landing, not until
the landing roll is completed;
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.