Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Tatenhill Aerodrome

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Tatenhill Aerodrome

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Apr 2006, 18:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tatenhill Aerodrome

The following article has appaered in one of the local rags:-

(link to online version)
http://www.burtonmail.co.uk/detail.a...ews&id=6373955

"PLANS have been drawn-up to carry out a massive expansion of an airfield near Burton, the Mail can exclusively reveal.
Proposals have been put forward to transform Tatenhill Airfield by erecting eight aircraft hangars, a new administration and control tower and thousands of square feet of surfacing for new runways, car parking and access.

Today, residents reacted angrily at the proposals, which they fear may herald the first step to eventually opening a 'budget airport' at the site.

They believe the plans will lead to a major increase in the number and size of planes using the airfield, creating problems with noise for thousands of people who live in surrounding villages.

They have also raised issues regarding the environmental impact and the safety of having more planes taking off and landing at the site.

The airfield is part of the Needwood Estate and falls under the massive portflio of land owned by the Duchy of Lancaster, an ancient body responsible for managing the Queen’s property

It is currently managed by Tatenhill Aviation Ltd and used mainly for limited private use and flying lessons.

Under the Crown development procedure, applications by the Duchy do not face the same scrutiny as normal planning proposals.

Planning inspectors at East Staffordshire Borough Council were notified of the proposals"


I've always found Tatenhill to be a friendly airfield so if this does turn out to be true, I hope that friendlyness won't be lost

FC
Fried_Chicken is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2006, 19:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All true except the budget airline bit. The runway is about 1100m long but only 750 ish is licensed. Part of the plan is to clean and repaint the unlicenced bit of runway and get back to 1100 ish m, far too short for a budget airline. The hangers etc are for GA use and it will be a great place to be if it stays friendly and is not massively more expensive.

Rod1
Rod1 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2006, 20:37
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I must say this is the sort of ill-informed article that could only have been written by someone who knows NOTHING about aviation - like most local newspaper journos who are desperate for their first big story.

Many years' experience of the Burton Mail suggests this is par for the course...

I have submitted my comments as a former Burton resident: interesting to see if they print them.

Tim
tmmorris is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.