JAA Cross Country
JAA Cross Country
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: S Warwickshire
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Out of curiosity, I searched JAR-1, JAR FCL-1 and EAS definitions and abbreviations documents; all with no success.
Can only offer the ANO definition:
‘Cross-country flight’ means any flight during the course of which the aircraft is more than
3 nautical miles from the aerodrome of departure.
Maybe I've missed something, as the term cross-country is used liberally in JAR-FCL
Can only offer the ANO definition:
‘Cross-country flight’ means any flight during the course of which the aircraft is more than
3 nautical miles from the aerodrome of departure.
Maybe I've missed something, as the term cross-country is used liberally in JAR-FCL
Bear in mind that JAR stands for Joint Aviation Requirements, whereas the ANO is a Statutory Instrument and, therefore, the law of the land. If the ANO says that a cross country is any flight during the course of which the aircraft is more than 3 miles from the airfield then that is the law - the 'requirements' of JAR-FCL are, in UK airspace, completely irrelevant.
The ANO Article 155 Interpretation, begins "In this Order" therefore the interpretation relates to the word or phrase as it is stated in the Order. In this case it refers to the privileges of an AFI or FI(R) in that they may not authoise a first solo cross-country flight by day or night. In other words, a flight that leaves the airfield by more than 3 miles.
JAR FCL does not define Cross-Country Flight; suffice it to say cross-country means exactly what it says; a fligh accross country. This is generally accepted for licensing purposes as any flight from one place to another, or a flight around a route where there are planned turning points.
JAR FCL does not define Cross-Country Flight; suffice it to say cross-country means exactly what it says; a fligh accross country. This is generally accepted for licensing purposes as any flight from one place to another, or a flight around a route where there are planned turning points.
Last edited by Whopity; 25th Mar 2006 at 19:40.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by IO540
The FAA X/C can be 50nm 100nm 150nm or 250nm depending what you are doing 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: S Warwickshire
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This has gone off-topic, as the original question related to the JAA definition of cross-country flight.
As far as I know, this only relates to the experience and training requirements for the issue of licenses and ratings.
JAR-1 "Definitions and Abbreviations" doesn't define the term, so it seems to me that its down to the AMC documents to qualify what is meant.
AMCs are not published on line and are quite expensive; mainly the preserve of FTOs.
The FAA and the ANO definitions then are irrelevant in this case.
The training exercises specified in approved syllabi, such as the AOPA PPL syllabus, have obviously been judged to conform with AMCs.
This seems to fit in with what Whopity describes i.e.
any flight from one place to another, or a flight around a route where there are planned turning points"
Perhaps if we knew what was behind your question Xisco........
As far as I know, this only relates to the experience and training requirements for the issue of licenses and ratings.
JAR-1 "Definitions and Abbreviations" doesn't define the term, so it seems to me that its down to the AMC documents to qualify what is meant.
AMCs are not published on line and are quite expensive; mainly the preserve of FTOs.
The FAA and the ANO definitions then are irrelevant in this case.
The training exercises specified in approved syllabi, such as the AOPA PPL syllabus, have obviously been judged to conform with AMCs.
This seems to fit in with what Whopity describes i.e.
any flight from one place to another, or a flight around a route where there are planned turning points"
Perhaps if we knew what was behind your question Xisco........
AMCs (Acceptable Means of Compliance) don't contain rules or definitions. They only indicate an acceptable way of complying with requirements listed JAR-FCL Section 1.
If in doubt with definitions go back to the real source document ICAO Annex 1. That doesn't define Cross-Country either.
If in doubt with definitions go back to the real source document ICAO Annex 1. That doesn't define Cross-Country either.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palma de Mallorca
Age: 41
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The reason for the question
I have a JAA Logbook where there is NO column on the main pages to log XC, but, when you move to Yearly Summaries, it appears suddenly.
My concern was to clarify this issue before sending my C.V.
Thanks to everybody.
My concern was to clarify this issue before sending my C.V.
Thanks to everybody.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark 1
‘Cross-country flight’ means any flight during the course of which the aircraft is more than
3 nautical miles from the aerodrome of departure.
3 nautical miles from the aerodrome of departure.
The Original Whirly
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Belper, Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 4,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Xisco,
I've always understood it to be 3nm, as many have stated. This may be the reason that no-one in the UK ever asks you how many cross country hours you've got, as it's a bit meaningless. I personally don't put it on my CV. But if you're the other side of the pond, it's a different matter, and they always include it on CVs.
I've always understood it to be 3nm, as many have stated. This may be the reason that no-one in the UK ever asks you how many cross country hours you've got, as it's a bit meaningless. I personally don't put it on my CV. But if you're the other side of the pond, it's a different matter, and they always include it on CVs.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: S Warwickshire
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is no requirement to record X-C time in your log book.
The only benefit of so-doing is to demonstrate compliance with a JAA training or experience requirement.
The only case where it would likely be very useful, is to demonstrate the 200 hours of X-C required before ATPL issue, or the 20? required for CPL.
It's basically up to you to decide what (if anything) to record in that column.
The only benefit of so-doing is to demonstrate compliance with a JAA training or experience requirement.
The only case where it would likely be very useful, is to demonstrate the 200 hours of X-C required before ATPL issue, or the 20? required for CPL.
It's basically up to you to decide what (if anything) to record in that column.
