Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Permit aircraft & "hiring" advice

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Permit aircraft & "hiring" advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Feb 2006, 14:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: European Administrative Area (Western District and Islands)
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Permit aircraft & "hiring" advice

Hi, I've just had to sell my 1/3 share in a group aircraft (a Yak on a permit) and am extremely sad, as I founded the group. Utilisation is relatively low, and there seems to be a concensus within the group to allow me to continue to fly it as a non shareholder, as the insurance cost would be negligible to keep me on it. We pay a dry hourly rate into the AC's funds and it would seem to be fair to this to be increased for me as a non-owner.
My question is that such an arrangement would seem to be "hiring" which is obviously not permitted for a permit AC. I was wondering if anyone else had experience of such a situation and whether there was a practical yet legal way around it?
Any advice appreciated!
SS
six-sixty is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2006, 16:04
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,224
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts
It almost certainly would be regarded as hiring.

Obvious solution - the group sells you a 1/20th share for £1, with a contract that only allows you to sell it back to them at the same price, and gives them the right to "compulsorily purchase" at any time. (Tweak numbers to suit everybody).

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2006, 16:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah GA & Portsmouth UK
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Artickle 162 0f the ANO is waht you need:-
Public transport and aerial work - exceptions - jointly owned aircraft
162 (1) A flight shall be deemed to be a private flight if the aircraft falls within paragraph (2) and the only valuable consideration given or promised in respect of the flight or the purpose of the flight falls within paragraph (3).
(2) An aircraft falls within this paragraph if it is owned:
(a) jointly by persons (each of whom is a natural person) who each hold not less than
a 5% beneficial share and:
etc. etc.
Basically you need to own at least 5% so if you retained a 5% share you'd probably be OK but you'd need to read the article in more detail to make sure you comply. I can't see anything that says you can't pay more than your percentage of the fixed costs, e.g. if you own 5% but pay 10%. You are however not allowed to pay more than the direct costs of the flight so you would need to be able to justify the hourly rate as being no more than the direct costs of the flight.
As for what would happen if you had a 5% share but the other group members had the option to purchase if from you for the sum of one pound on demand............?????
I think you have to watch out for the spirit of the law, which is designed to prevent flights being treated as Private when they don't qualify as such.
disclaimer - I'm no lawyer and you should not rely on my advice

Mike
Mike Cross is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2006, 19:50
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: European Administrative Area (Western District and Islands)
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not the answer I was looking for, but thanks nevertheless!
six-sixty is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2006, 21:47
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah GA & Portsmouth UK
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dunno

Genghis's idea seems workable to me.

Mike
Mike Cross is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2006, 14:45
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Outlawed
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jointly by persons (each of whom is a natural person)


Have you checked you're a natural person 6-60?
strafer is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2006, 21:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He's a natural person unless he's a limited company or a "corporation sole", such as a bishop. This is a problem for clergy, if flying in their episcopal capacity, but shouldn't bother most other people.
ProfChrisReed is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.