Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

New 4 Seat Piston Twin

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

New 4 Seat Piston Twin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jan 2006, 10:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New 4 Seat Piston Twin

Read this from the AOPA ePilot Newsletter on 30 December:

TECNAM INTRODUCES FOUR-SEAT TWIN
Tecnam Aircraft of Italy has been building a reputation in the United States
with its entry into the light sport aircraft arena. Now the company is taking
the FAA type certification route by introducing a piston twin-engine
airplane. Called the P2006T, it will be powered by two Rotax 912 engines
mounted on a high wing and carry four people. Tecnam predicts it will cruise
at 147 knots, climb at 1,400 fpm (single-engine rate of climb 350 fpm), and
have a useful load of 1,012 pounds. The predicted price is between 230,000
and 240,000 Euros. Under current exchange rates, that's between $273,905
and $285,814. The maiden flight is planned for September 2006.
Bit more info here on the Tecnam Website http://www.tecnamaircraft.com/Tecnam_P2006T.htm

100 horsepower doesn't sound wonderful but otherwise this looks interesting.
Heliplane is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2006, 11:39
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ireland
Age: 44
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: New 4 Seat Piston Twin

Sounds a tad suspicious to me - are any Rotax engines actually certificated? Secondly, even comparing it to that junkheap the DA42 (200kts my a*se!), isn't 100hp a side a tad low?

And Rotax engines bug me - is it true that their fuel consumption INCREASES above a certain altitude?
Confabulous is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2006, 12:01
  #3 (permalink)  
High Wing Drifter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: New 4 Seat Piston Twin

200hp with 1.1 tone all up weight seems reasonable. Certainly 100hp single engine ROC of 350 ft/min doesn't sound unrealistic. I do wonder if 1.1 tones is little ambitious for a twin though when the DA42 is 1.7t. If comparative ratios with the DA42 are anything to go by then it can probably be a little heavier than 1.1t and still have acceptable perfornce.
 
Old 4th Jan 2006, 21:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Age: 52
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: New 4 Seat Piston Twin

There is a certified version of the Rotax 912 - you will find it in the Diamond Katana.

This looks like a nice little machine and good value provided that it does what it says on the tin.
julian_storey is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2006, 19:05
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 12 Posts
Re: New 4 Seat Piston Twin

Predicted performance figures for the P2006T include a 75% cruise speed of 147 knots, 53 knot stall, a rate-of-climb of 1,400 ft/min (with single-engine ROC of 350 ft/min), an empty weight of only 630 kg, and a useful load of 460 kg for a maximum all-up weight of 1,090 kg.
100 HP Rotax sounds scary, there is a reason why Katana's went for the
Lycoming engines( or was it Continental). Not a fantastic track record for the Rotax.
MTOW is basically the same as a Cessna 172 (2550lbs)
Cruise speed is the same as a Cessna 182.
With 4 adults( 180 lbs each) leaves 46 gallons of fuel.
That's about 2.5 hrs flight time with reserves, 2.5* 140 kts= 350 miles.
And it looks almost identical to the P68 Partenavia, except for the rectract. gear.
B2N2 is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2006, 07:37
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: New 4 Seat Piston Twin

If I remember correctly, Diamond went with the Continental IO-240 as an option in the Katana to help sales in the USA. Rotax didn't (it may have now) have any proper sales/service set-up in the USA.
smarthawke is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.