SEP instructor standards
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SEP instructor standards
I have started a thread on Instructors forum about standards.
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...hreadid=203610
Now i am not a current instructor but....
Please read the points i am making give your opinion as a PPL student or PPL low currency person. Instructors,examiners please rip the ****e out of me in instructors forum. And i would included those chaps like IO and the others who have way more real experence than your average instructor/ppl.
What do students get wound up about in check rides what are the differences that students get pissed off with instructors in the uK.
MJ
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...hreadid=203610
Now i am not a current instructor but....
Please read the points i am making give your opinion as a PPL student or PPL low currency person. Instructors,examiners please rip the ****e out of me in instructors forum. And i would included those chaps like IO and the others who have way more real experence than your average instructor/ppl.
What do students get wound up about in check rides what are the differences that students get pissed off with instructors in the uK.
MJ
The Original Whirly
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Belper, Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 4,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why do we get pissed off with instructors? OK, I may be a rotary FI, but I'm also a fairly average PPL(A) - just over 300 hours f/w flying over 8 years, and I avoid flying with an instructor. So I think I'm qualified to answer on this thread (I might comment on the other one too!). I think there are several reasons...
1) Money. It costs more to fly with an instructor. Some people simply can't afford it. Others think they don't need to. Still others would, if they felt they'd actually learn anything. So why do students think they can't learn anything from instructors, and are they right?
2) British culture. Anything called "instructing" or "teaching" means students regress to being like school kids. I used to teach Welsh at evening classes. I asked people if they wanted homework. They did, so I gave it to them, emphasising that it was optional. But they all got upset and embarrassed and acted like kids if they didn't do it. Is flying the same? Do pilots not want to fly with "teacher"?
3)
You said it, absolutely. So do something about egotism in instructors; there's no place for it.
OK, will that do for starters?
1) Money. It costs more to fly with an instructor. Some people simply can't afford it. Others think they don't need to. Still others would, if they felt they'd actually learn anything. So why do students think they can't learn anything from instructors, and are they right?
2) British culture. Anything called "instructing" or "teaching" means students regress to being like school kids. I used to teach Welsh at evening classes. I asked people if they wanted homework. They did, so I gave it to them, emphasising that it was optional. But they all got upset and embarrassed and acted like kids if they didn't do it. Is flying the same? Do pilots not want to fly with "teacher"?
3)
Its a bloody nightmare for ppl's having to bugger about relearning how to do their instructor's perversions every flight with one its no wonder they avoid instructor flights.
OK, will that do for starters?
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Making a list of things to moan about, and being able to do anything about it, are two different things.
I am 100% certain nothing will ever change - not until there is a complete change of attitude within the CAA resulting in a re-vamp (and hopefully a wholesale modernisation too) of the PPL. This won't happen until the whole lot retires.
I think a whole new syllabus is needed, and then one can look at the sort of people that should be teaching it. One problem is that nobody likes to be given something they regard as too prescriptive, which is why old attitudes about the "right way" to do something linger on for so long.
It's a bit like family law. FL practitioners (both lawyers and judges) are fiercely against having their freedoms curtailed. So there is a huge variation in decisions, and there is no prospect of certain changes being implemented. The fact that the stuff is usually heard behind closed doors just keeps it ticking along nicely. One could argue that lawyers have a far more powerful and effective lobby than anybody in GA, but in fact the flight training business is pretty powerful when it comes to lobbying the CAA - it's by far the strongest voice around I reckon; they just don't make their representations in public.
I am 100% certain nothing will ever change - not until there is a complete change of attitude within the CAA resulting in a re-vamp (and hopefully a wholesale modernisation too) of the PPL. This won't happen until the whole lot retires.
I think a whole new syllabus is needed, and then one can look at the sort of people that should be teaching it. One problem is that nobody likes to be given something they regard as too prescriptive, which is why old attitudes about the "right way" to do something linger on for so long.
It's a bit like family law. FL practitioners (both lawyers and judges) are fiercely against having their freedoms curtailed. So there is a huge variation in decisions, and there is no prospect of certain changes being implemented. The fact that the stuff is usually heard behind closed doors just keeps it ticking along nicely. One could argue that lawyers have a far more powerful and effective lobby than anybody in GA, but in fact the flight training business is pretty powerful when it comes to lobbying the CAA - it's by far the strongest voice around I reckon; they just don't make their representations in public.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I came back from the US with my shiny new PPL I'd only ever flown with one instructor for teaching, one for a pre-solo check flight and the examiner.
The club I joined quite rightly checked me out, now I hated the idea of flying with a different instructor - more to do with my lack of confidence than the instructor. In the following three flights I had three different instructors. By the third one I hadn't even been allowed to taxy before I was being 're-taught' his way. I had a small hissy fit at the hold. Pointing out that it might be helpful to let me do it my way. If I was doing something downright dangerous then tell me, but could we maybe discuss it at the de-brief as to the variations in methods rather than reteach me all the way through the flight. Which is what we did and it worked.
This has not put either of us off. This guy is a brilliant instructor, all of them at the club where my shared aircraft is based are great. They are all approachable, will offer advice should it be sought without condescension or patronisation. Ages vary, and yes, they have either gone to the airlines or are heading that way. But three years later having now got over my issues, I seek these guys out to go fly with them. And they are quite happy to put up with me and will come fly with me on their days off. I learn something every time I fly with them - it also means that my revalidation flight is not a scary proposition.
The situation we have is in the minority but it shows that it can exist if the various personalities allow it to. The FI's have done different courses, learnt different techniques and like MJ points out in the other thread it does cause lots of issues with the students. Then throw in some of the examiners personal likes/dislikes and that's a whole new ball game.
As PPLs though, we shouldn't think that the learning stops the day we got our shiny licence.
The club I joined quite rightly checked me out, now I hated the idea of flying with a different instructor - more to do with my lack of confidence than the instructor. In the following three flights I had three different instructors. By the third one I hadn't even been allowed to taxy before I was being 're-taught' his way. I had a small hissy fit at the hold. Pointing out that it might be helpful to let me do it my way. If I was doing something downright dangerous then tell me, but could we maybe discuss it at the de-brief as to the variations in methods rather than reteach me all the way through the flight. Which is what we did and it worked.
This has not put either of us off. This guy is a brilliant instructor, all of them at the club where my shared aircraft is based are great. They are all approachable, will offer advice should it be sought without condescension or patronisation. Ages vary, and yes, they have either gone to the airlines or are heading that way. But three years later having now got over my issues, I seek these guys out to go fly with them. And they are quite happy to put up with me and will come fly with me on their days off. I learn something every time I fly with them - it also means that my revalidation flight is not a scary proposition.
The situation we have is in the minority but it shows that it can exist if the various personalities allow it to. The FI's have done different courses, learnt different techniques and like MJ points out in the other thread it does cause lots of issues with the students. Then throw in some of the examiners personal likes/dislikes and that's a whole new ball game.
As PPLs though, we shouldn't think that the learning stops the day we got our shiny licence.
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting !
On the whole I have to say that I find the situation very variable, there are still great amounts of folk lore that seem to be taught as "airmanship" just ask a number of instructors in the flying club when you should lean a Lycoming engine (answers below please) and note the responce.
I have always attempted to keep an open mind when it comes to flying with students and as long as the flight is safe I am happy to let them fly the aircraft any way they like, I might sujest another way to do something after the flight but as has been said above there is more than one way to skin a cat.
The flying instructor population is a strange thing, some young guys who just want to fly an airliner , career instructor group one who are a dedicated sorce of real talent, career instructor group two who are a bunch of guys who will never get an airline job as long as the sun sets in the west and think that the whole flying world has it in for them and instructors who fly for fun.
The trick as a student is to spot the instructor type and dump the instructor quickly if they are not up to scratch. You will get very little trouble from Career instructor group one and instructors who fly for fun (these are normaly retired or current proffesional pilots).
The trouble comes from the young guys who want to be airline pilots (padding out flights with big circuits and long "stableised approaches") because they need the hours however you can also find some very good young instructors who do a fine job within the limmits of there flying experience.
Career instructor group two should be avoided at all costs, they are usualy a talentless bunch of no hopers and this has been spotted by the airlines...... hence no airline job !.
CFI's have to keep a distance as they are responsable for the standards within a club and may seem a bit cold and distant but they are usualy OK as long as the position has not gone to there head.
I have always attempted to keep an open mind when it comes to flying with students and as long as the flight is safe I am happy to let them fly the aircraft any way they like, I might sujest another way to do something after the flight but as has been said above there is more than one way to skin a cat.
The flying instructor population is a strange thing, some young guys who just want to fly an airliner , career instructor group one who are a dedicated sorce of real talent, career instructor group two who are a bunch of guys who will never get an airline job as long as the sun sets in the west and think that the whole flying world has it in for them and instructors who fly for fun.
The trick as a student is to spot the instructor type and dump the instructor quickly if they are not up to scratch. You will get very little trouble from Career instructor group one and instructors who fly for fun (these are normaly retired or current proffesional pilots).
The trouble comes from the young guys who want to be airline pilots (padding out flights with big circuits and long "stableised approaches") because they need the hours however you can also find some very good young instructors who do a fine job within the limmits of there flying experience.
Career instructor group two should be avoided at all costs, they are usualy a talentless bunch of no hopers and this has been spotted by the airlines...... hence no airline job !.
CFI's have to keep a distance as they are responsable for the standards within a club and may seem a bit cold and distant but they are usualy OK as long as the position has not gone to there head.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 46
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CFI position going to your head? How's that work? I get more grief now than I ever did before and most of it is actually very constructive. A good CFI (IMHO) should not be stand offish, but able to find out exactly what goes on when you aren't there. That means having good relationships with students, PPL's and the other FI's.
Just because we maybe called the CFI doesn't mean we know it all and most of us welcome people coming to us with ideas and techniques. Some maybe rubbish, but many aren't and I'll gladly usurp someone's idea and put it into practice! (After telling everyone how I came up with it in some death defying situation. "There I was with nothing on the clock but the makers name.........")
Just because we maybe called the CFI doesn't mean we know it all and most of us welcome people coming to us with ideas and techniques. Some maybe rubbish, but many aren't and I'll gladly usurp someone's idea and put it into practice! (After telling everyone how I came up with it in some death defying situation. "There I was with nothing on the clock but the makers name.........")
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
just ask a number of instructors in the flying club when you should lean a Lycoming engine (answers below please)
"Actually we don't mind if you never lean, which is why we don't teach it to students. It's lots cheaper for us if you just waste a bit of fuel than if you over-lean and we have to repair the engine."
With the result, of course, that when one does ask to be taught leaning later, putting the mixture back rich again is not an automatic part of planning or performing a descent ... but at least they taught me "mixture fully rich" in the downwind checks from lesson one, so I've never actually landed still leaned.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is a "CFI"? (I mean in the UK context, not FAA)
I was once told (by a CFI) that any instructor who is authorised to instruct on any plane which the school happens to train in (which doesn't take much doing) can call himself a "CFI".
A&C: good points about instructors. Unfortunately, a PPL student has zero chance of being able to spot which type is which.
I would classify the instructor population a little more, however. If a student is reasonably technically minded and actually understands the aircraft and flight mechanics, there are many instructors who will get really p1ssed off by such a student. Others are happy to take such a person on board and enjoy the challenge.
I make no claims for being any good at flying, but I used to ask a lot of reasonable questions (mainly on why are certain procedures the way they are) and got treated very badly for it. Walking out of one school is a great way to blow away £2000 or so and I suspect many students never scrape up the courage to do that.
I was once told (by a CFI) that any instructor who is authorised to instruct on any plane which the school happens to train in (which doesn't take much doing) can call himself a "CFI".
A&C: good points about instructors. Unfortunately, a PPL student has zero chance of being able to spot which type is which.
I would classify the instructor population a little more, however. If a student is reasonably technically minded and actually understands the aircraft and flight mechanics, there are many instructors who will get really p1ssed off by such a student. Others are happy to take such a person on board and enjoy the challenge.
I make no claims for being any good at flying, but I used to ask a lot of reasonable questions (mainly on why are certain procedures the way they are) and got treated very badly for it. Walking out of one school is a great way to blow away £2000 or so and I suspect many students never scrape up the courage to do that.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 46
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A CFI in the UK context is the Chief Flying Instructor. Basically the person who should set and control the standards of a school/club.
In theory any FI could be the CFI since there is no minimum requirement and no real definition of the role. There is an accepted level of experience however.
An encyclopedic knowledge of LASOR's and an ability to drink vast quantities of Tea/Coffee are pretty much the most important qualities. A good line in "war" stories helps as well!
In theory any FI could be the CFI since there is no minimum requirement and no real definition of the role. There is an accepted level of experience however.
An encyclopedic knowledge of LASOR's and an ability to drink vast quantities of Tea/Coffee are pretty much the most important qualities. A good line in "war" stories helps as well!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have come accross a pretty broad spectrum of instructors during my time range from the plain disinterested hour builder to the first class career instructor. Sadly there are to many of the former and nowhere near enough of the latter.
I have no time for the self important think they know it alls with 300hrs under there belts waiting for an airline job. And in a quite a number of instances being the CFI has done nothing other than make an average instructor even more self righteous. Donning the CFI hat does not suddenly make them into a "skygod".
The standard of instructor is way to variable. As with many subjects I have to agree with IO540!
I have no time for the self important think they know it alls with 300hrs under there belts waiting for an airline job. And in a quite a number of instances being the CFI has done nothing other than make an average instructor even more self righteous. Donning the CFI hat does not suddenly make them into a "skygod".
The standard of instructor is way to variable. As with many subjects I have to agree with IO540!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
as a low hrs student pilot, a question:
is there a formal grouping (Professional Body) or 'Institution' for FI's to join - like the Engineering institutions (IEE (electrical), IME (mechanical)), for example?
If not, what system do CFI's of UK clubs use to communicate with each other, and thus generally strive to acheive some form of commonality such that a student (or PPL checkride) should not notice too much difference between one FI and another?
Just interested to know....
is there a formal grouping (Professional Body) or 'Institution' for FI's to join - like the Engineering institutions (IEE (electrical), IME (mechanical)), for example?
If not, what system do CFI's of UK clubs use to communicate with each other, and thus generally strive to acheive some form of commonality such that a student (or PPL checkride) should not notice too much difference between one FI and another?
Just interested to know....
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No such system speke2me and if there was a trade body it would be like every other trade body in every other trade: you pay the joining fee and you.... become a member 
The way to do this is to find an instructor you get on with, get your PPL, and get out there and do some flying, preferably with more experienced pilots. In fact, if you can get some interesting flying in with such pilots while you are still doing the PPL so much the better; just don't tell your instructor
The way to do this is to find an instructor you get on with, get your PPL, and get out there and do some flying, preferably with more experienced pilots. In fact, if you can get some interesting flying in with such pilots while you are still doing the PPL so much the better; just don't tell your instructor
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks IO - a reply of appreciated intoned 'cynicism' that I suspect is very much more 'realism'. 
Just surprised that GA (in the 'very regulated' world of Aviation) doesn't at least give the lip-service to mounting a Prof Body that CFI's might at least meet up and discuss commonality on the odd Christmas piss-up. Ah well!
Much intend to fly as much as I can (or can afford hehe....), but weather buggering me at the mo - still early days so high cloud base req for stall training.
Bah humbug.
is very much more 'realism'. Just surprised that GA (in the 'very regulated' world of Aviation) doesn't at least give the lip-service to mounting a Prof Body that CFI's might at least meet up and discuss commonality on the odd Christmas piss-up. Ah well!
Much intend to fly as much as I can (or can afford hehe....), but weather buggering me at the mo - still early days so high cloud base req for stall training.
Bah humbug.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The CAA is the key. If they do nothing, nothing will ever change.
speke2me: most aviation regulation (in the GA context) is there because it's always been there, not because of any need supported by evidence.
Once the jobs are created, the whole train just keeps rolling... and it rolls DOWNhill, unsuprisingly
speke2me: most aviation regulation (in the GA context) is there because it's always been there, not because of any need supported by evidence.
Once the jobs are created, the whole train just keeps rolling... and it rolls DOWNhill, unsuprisingly
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it is important to have a bit of a laugh with your instructors. Any which are too serious and too proud of their gold stripes tend to be the bad ones......
You also get bad students I imagine. I knew a bloke who told his instructor "to stop telling him what to do all the time". I also knew the instructor as he taught me to fly, and he was brilliant. He was also complaining all the time because the instructor wouldn't let him go solo......he didn't seem to realise that you need to be able to land before you are allowed to solo. Suppose he thought it was number of hours which counted, not ability. Typical JAR boy
You also get bad students I imagine. I knew a bloke who told his instructor "to stop telling him what to do all the time". I also knew the instructor as he taught me to fly, and he was brilliant. He was also complaining all the time because the instructor wouldn't let him go solo......he didn't seem to realise that you need to be able to land before you are allowed to solo. Suppose he thought it was number of hours which counted, not ability. Typical JAR boy
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 46
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Enough of that. The vast majority of FI's and CFI's do a good job keeping most of you lot from killing yourselves. So lets keep a lid on the FI slagging here. As EAl hyas mentioned, there are both good and bad PPL's, FI's and Students, but to read on here you'd think all the FI's of the world were incompetent, egomaniacal, workshy incompetents. I'm sorry gentlemen, but that's rubbish.
There is a meeting every now and then for CFI's and the CAA, there was one earlier this year and some of us do actually talk to each other as well.
I think BEagle was at the seminar I mentioned, so I'm sure he'll put his 2p in about it.
There is a meeting every now and then for CFI's and the CAA, there was one earlier this year and some of us do actually talk to each other as well.
I think BEagle was at the seminar I mentioned, so I'm sure he'll put his 2p in about it.
What has annoyed me from time to time about instructors:
(1) Failure to accept that there are more ways than theirs. Fine if teaching an ab-initio student, but I'm not and haven't been for many years.
(2) Talk too much. Just shut up occasionally and let me fly the aeroplane unless you've got something genuinely useful to say.
(3) Belief that their "standard technique" overrides that in the official POH. Maybe, just maybe, this is true - but (as has happened) I've taken the trouble to read the POH and the FI hasn't this cuts no ice with this aviator.
G
(1) Failure to accept that there are more ways than theirs. Fine if teaching an ab-initio student, but I'm not and haven't been for many years.
(2) Talk too much. Just shut up occasionally and let me fly the aeroplane unless you've got something genuinely useful to say.
(3) Belief that their "standard technique" overrides that in the official POH. Maybe, just maybe, this is true - but (as has happened) I've taken the trouble to read the POH and the FI hasn't this cuts no ice with this aviator.
G
Last edited by Genghis the Engineer; 27th Dec 2005 at 18:19.
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some years ago, I was doing a club checkout on a day when the cross-wind was pretty close to the club limits. On the first circuit I flew, on very short final when I set up for my preffered touchdown configuration of wing-down-opposite-rudder, the instructor said "Oh no. I don't want you to do it that way. I have control" and proceeded to land us with crab-into-wind-kick-off-at-touchdown method. I was a bit upset as in my opinion the situation at the time was not dangerous. The instructor then insisted that we carry on using his method, the end result being that given the relatively unfamiliar method he wanted me to use, my touchdowns were a little all over the place and he was almost reluctant to sign me off. I'm quite happy to learn and refine alternative methods, but on that occasion I'd have performed much better if left to my own (safe) way of landing in a crosswind.
I learned my lesson from that experience though. Now, if I fly with an instructor in a cross-wind, before we even get in the aeroplane I pre-brief the instructor on how I like to fly the approach and landing. And if the instructor disagrees, well at least there's time to discuss the relative merits of each of our views whilst we're still on the ground!
The list goes on, with an entire range of other things - I've flown with instructors often enough over the years to know that preferences for the use of things like carb-heat, fuel-pumps, landing-lights, flaps, blah, blah, blah vary from instructor to instructor. Whilst I don't pre-brief on all of these things, I'm aware enough now of some of the "differences" that [for example], when flying an approachy I might say something like "I normally take the carb heat off just before touchdown - is that how you teach it?" and if not, we can have a brief debate about the merits or otherwise of each method. I see checkouts as part of the ongoing learning process, and I find they work well particularly when we both have opinions and can bounce around ideas in an open way.
A
I learned my lesson from that experience though. Now, if I fly with an instructor in a cross-wind, before we even get in the aeroplane I pre-brief the instructor on how I like to fly the approach and landing. And if the instructor disagrees, well at least there's time to discuss the relative merits of each of our views whilst we're still on the ground!
The list goes on, with an entire range of other things - I've flown with instructors often enough over the years to know that preferences for the use of things like carb-heat, fuel-pumps, landing-lights, flaps, blah, blah, blah vary from instructor to instructor. Whilst I don't pre-brief on all of these things, I'm aware enough now of some of the "differences" that [for example], when flying an approachy I might say something like "I normally take the carb heat off just before touchdown - is that how you teach it?" and if not, we can have a brief debate about the merits or otherwise of each method. I see checkouts as part of the ongoing learning process, and I find they work well particularly when we both have opinions and can bounce around ideas in an open way.
A