Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Engine Failure on Final

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Engine Failure on Final

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th December 2005 | 13:01
  #21 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you're coming down short finals at significantly more than that in a light aircraft, you're more likely to over-flare and cause yourself a problem.
This is a very strong statement - I had typed nonsense, but edited that as it was rude.

Also, you haven't allowed for headwind in your approximation of the sink rate required.

In a PA28, you would be at 75kts, less a typical headwind of 10kts =65kts, so a 3 degree slope would require 325fpm, from a distance to the threshold of about 1 mile, which is not sensible in a light single, IMHO. The stronger the wind, the worse the numbers.

I would approach around -600 fpm, adjusting for wind accordingly, giving me a very comfortable and stable approach.

Having got my licence in 1994 and made several hundred (incident free) landings since, I speak from experience, not theory.

Having also operated a lot in a CATZ, there simply was not room to make a 3 degree approach, a 1/2 mile final from 300 feet was normal.

And it's not only light aircraft that can do this, have you experienced the 146/RJ on the 5.5 degree glideslop to LCY/EGLC?

There is another thread about bomber circuits - there is some fit with 3 degree approaches and these.
 
Old 9th December 2005 | 14:31
  #22 (permalink)  
High Wing Drifter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Foxmoth says:
raising flap from full will reduce drag, but you will probably need to lower the nose for a slightly higher best glide speed
Agreed. For the Arrow, the best glide speed with 2/3rds flap is about 85kts and about 80ks with full flap, so a little nose lowering would be in order. FWIW, I noticed that there is virtually no sink when raising full flap to 2/3rds on the Arrow..or indeed any of the aircraft I've flown with flaps (with the possible exception of the AA5). I would not remove more than the last stage though!

Human Factors wrote:
If you're coming down short finals at significantly more than that in a light aircraft, you're more likely to over-flare and cause yourself a problem.
I agree with F3G. I don't believe that a steep approach is particuarly challenging. As mentioned before, a full flap glide approach in an Arrow feels more like a dive bombing exercise. Even a barndoor flap glide approach in a 152 is pretty steep. But is pretty much bread and butter flying...really...IMHO.
 
Old 16th December 2005 | 04:53
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: inner suburbia
After a long trip and then side-slipping-in on final due to strong cross-winds, the thought of fuel-starvation caused by unporting of an emptyish tank does cross my mind.
So, I tend to favour a dive-bomb the runway approach.

The Arrow gear doors make fantastic airbrakes , but because of the gear cycle-time I'd leave the wheels where they are if you're below about 700'
Biggles_in_Oz is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.