saratoga or 206
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Strange, I was having this conversation with someone today.
My choice would be the 206 but believe they are not as commonly available.
Otherwise, I don't know much about them I'm afraid.
My choice would be the 206 but believe they are not as commonly available.
Otherwise, I don't know much about them I'm afraid.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only real similarity to me would be load availability and 6 seats.
They are both good haulers. Saratoga is a nice bit quicker but less short field performance and retractable means £.
And they're both thirsty!
They are both good haulers. Saratoga is a nice bit quicker but less short field performance and retractable means £.
And they're both thirsty!
Gnome de PPRuNe
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,671
Received 328 Likes
on
181 Posts
From the purely back-seat driver point of view the 206 has it over the Saratoga - perhaps based on a trip many, many moons ago in a Cherokee Six. Don't ask me why, the 206 has some sort of charisma for me... Saratoga doesn't.
