Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Tacho or flt time?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Tacho or flt time?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Aug 2005, 11:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: 5530N
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tacho or flt time?

what do you guys log as a reference to your 50 hr checks? airbourne times or tacho times and which do the caa prefer re maint schedules?
Bearcat is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2005, 11:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In our group we log ...

t/o to landing time for 50 hours
Brakes off to brakes on for log books
Tacho time for paying our bills to the group treasurer :-(
aztec25 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2005, 11:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
on my airplane I take the airborne time from the GPS for the 50hr checks. The GPS logs take off to landing.

I dont bill myself so payment is not a problem.

For logbook time I generally use the GPS time as well unless it was a long taxi then I add 5 mins.
S-Works is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2005, 13:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Over Mache Grande?
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Times:

In our partnership we log:

t/o to landing time for 50 hours

Brakes off to brakes on for log books and for the bills
dwshimoda is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2005, 16:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maintenance should be based on airborne time, on both G and N.

It's all there somewhere, in the regs.
IO540 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2005, 20:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Up there somewhere
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kind of on topic, but I only ever log TO to Landing in my log book, non of this chock to chock bit...for all the CAA knows what was logged as an hour could have been 15 mins sat on the ground waiting at the holding point, so a good % of ones lgged hours could actually be taxying time which to me defeats the object...
I also thoroughly disagree with charging people on the tacho - just encourages people to rush just so they get more airborne time for their money. What is the general opinion?
Flik Roll is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2005, 21:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flik,

I agree completely. the regs are brakes to brakes and it is fair for people to do it. I log my time from the GPS for 2 reasons, 1) I am to lazy and the GPS makes a perfect record and 2) with well past a thousand hrs i dont really have anything to gain.

Charging people on tach time is just inviting trouble, in my experiance it just makes people abuse the aircraft and skip proper checks.

I twin that I fly regularily is charges on tach time and they wondered why it needed 8 new cylinders recently. A lot of people fly a twin on a budget and at £3 per minute sat waiting around for the oil to heat up or doing a gentle cruise descent is a lot of money to some people and the dont do it. Don't start me on people flying aircraft they cant afford......
S-Works is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.