Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Props and the N reg

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Props and the N reg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Apr 2005, 07:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Farnham
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Props and the N reg

Some clarification needed here.

Can anyone confirm whether manufacturers recommended overhaul periods for props (either 5 or 6 years depending on make) are mandatory?

I thought I had read somewhere that they can be run 'on condition'.

This is not to debate the sensibility of running 'on condition' but the legality
Flyboy-F33 is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2005, 07:23
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,224
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts
It'll depend upon what is actually stated in the maintenance manual for that aircraft / prop.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2005, 07:57
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Farnham
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely the manual would contain the manufacturers recommendations?, but that isnt necessarily the legal requirement? That would be somewhere if FAR part 91 or part 43. trouble is, I cant find it
Flyboy-F33 is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2005, 08:02
  #4 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,224
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts
The manual is approved by the FAA, they decide what is mandatory, not the manufacturer ultimately.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2005, 20:51
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: 30 West
Age: 65
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which brings up an interesting point for aeroplanes on the UK register.

I understand that you can either opt for a Notice 75 schedule or operate to the manufacturers schedule, then overhaul.

I once looked at a Zlin that hadn't had a Notice 75 for 5 years, it's C of A had been renewed because it was operating to the manufacturers overhaul schedule.

Comments welcome because I detest the thought of doing Notice 75's on a perfectly serviceable prop.
javelin is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2005, 21:47
  #6 (permalink)  

I'matightbastard
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It may...depend on how the a/c is used. For instance in the US, engine TBO is mandatory for commercial use, but optional for private only use.


What do you mean by N reg btw?
Onan the Clumsy is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2005, 17:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to the FAA it is mandatory to comply with the maintenance manual.

BUT as a rule prop and engine overhaul lives are stated in a service bullitins which are not considered mandatory by the FAA.

Therefore if you are operating on the N-Reg under Part 91 (private) you do not have to carry out prop or engine overhauls if you dont want to.
Flyboy1976 is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2005, 21:58
  #8 (permalink)  

Official PPRuNe Chaplain
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Witnesham, Suffolk
Age: 80
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought Notice 75 was extinct now, and G aircraft fly to the manufacturer's recommended service intervals?

We had ours done at 5 years after the Notice 75 (and needed a new prop).
Keef is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.