Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Logging to the nearest minute or 5 minutes?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Logging to the nearest minute or 5 minutes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Sep 2004, 20:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Baile Atha Cliath
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Logging to the nearest minute or 5 minutes?

I'm in the process of hour building before I start my CPL. For my PPL, most of the instructors that I flew with always used to round the time to the nearest 5 minutes but some used to make me log it to the exact minute. As I want to make sure my log book is as kosher as possible when presenting it to the CAA, what is the acceptable format? Rounding to the nearest 5 minutes looks neat and tidy but also looks unrealistic. I'm assuming the CAA would prefer the more accurate time or is rounding perfectly acceptable to them?

Many thanks,
Sprawler
Sprawler is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2004, 20:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For personal logbooks rounding taxi time to the nearest 5 mins is the norm (or.1/hr if using decimal)and accepted by the CAA. For AIRCRAFT logbooks it is AIRBOURNE to the nearest minute
foxmoth is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2004, 20:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I log everything to the nearest 5 minutes and it has always been acceptable to the CAA. On some flights you lose a minute or two and on some you gain, "swings and roundabouts" as they say.

Datcons tend to count in decimals, so

0.1 = 5 minutes
0.2 = 10 minutes
0.3 = 20 minutes
0.4 = 25 minutes
0.5 = 30 minutes
0.6 = 35 minutes
0.7 = 40 minutes
0.8 = 50 minutes
0.9 = 55 minutes
1.0 = 60 minutes
rotatrim is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2004, 01:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forget minutes.

Do it in decimal

And never use port or starboard.

Continue to use feet for altitude and spot heights.

I had to go through that conversion of IAS from mph to kts. Even had some of the same types on one or the other for a while.

Life wasn't meant to be easy!!
Milt is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2004, 03:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ready to Depart
Age: 45
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rounding Badness

I've always logged to the nearest 0.1, but may have shot myself in the foot:

During my IR course, the school logged in decimal, but to as good as to the nearest minute. As a result of rounding errors, whilst my training records show just over 50 hours course time, my logbook totals exactly 49.9 hours.

How anal are the CAA going to be about that??
Dusty_B is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2004, 08:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I put what's on the invoice and in any records that the aircraft owner might be keeping of my rentals. (I appreciate that nobody is ever likely to try to verify my logbook entries, but if they did they'd find that the audit trail adds up.)

So, as I've sometimes rented from people who charge by the five minutes and sometimes from people who charge by the tenth hour I've usually got some "odd" minutes. (I've never met anyone who charges by the minute.)
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2004, 14:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northampton
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sometimes I have gone to four decimal places to make it as accurate as possible! For example... 25 minutes is written as 0.4167 hours... just make sure the CAA understand it might be worth popping a little note at the top of the first page saying how you're writing in the hours.
Halfbaked_Boy is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2004, 20:14
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nearest five minutes is enough taking it to a million decimal places and putting notes to explain is just anal. The CAA is apparantly staffed by real human beings who are quite happy to accept the sign off of the CFI.

Perhaps people should concentrate less on doing everything in minimums and more on quality?
S-Works is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2004, 08:18
  #9 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
0.1 = 5 minutes
0.1 = 6 minutes

I log decimal hours, makes life so much easier. There really is no need to get stupid about this, the CAA and FAA have no problem with my logging.
englishal is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2004, 08:34
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I log my airframe and engine in decimals but for some reason have always hours and nearest 5 minutes for flying log book.

Not sure why but there are way too many hours under the bridge now to change habbits!

S-Works is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2004, 19:47
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are flying in a place that uses datcoms you are flting in the wrong place !.

The nearest 5 min is good enough.
A and C is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2004, 08:42
  #12 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sometimes I have gone to four decimal places to make it as accurate as possible!
You're flying a light aeroplane, not the Starship Enterprise - Starfleet Central Control may not be happy if you log to the nearest 5 minutes or .1 of a decimal hour, but the CAA will be perfectly relaxed
 
Old 8th Sep 2004, 12:27
  #13 (permalink)  

Northern Monkey
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Newcastle, England
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If there are 3600 seconds in an hour, and you are logging to the nearest 1/10,000th of an hour, you need to be right to within about a 1/3rd of a second.

This raises a few questions, like do you log from when you turn the started motor, or when the engine turns under its own power. Does your plog have enough spaces to log start time as 13:24:38.2. Does your watch have a 1/10th of a second hand?

If you have 6 25 minute flights which is two and a half hours, you get 2.5002, which pus you log book 2/10000s of an hour out. Could you live with this level of inacuracy?
NinjaBill is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2004, 17:59
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northampton
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
which pus you log book 2/10000s of an hour out.
Errr, who goes more innacurate than like 1/10,000th of an hour out?

Oh yes, FTG, the Warrior is my little Enterprise!

Cheers,

Jack.
Halfbaked_Boy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.