Airshow attrition
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: Essex, UK
Airshow attrition
Unfortunately Southend saw a few aircraft casualties on Sunday.
The Spitfire returned for an emergency landing, having no oil pressure. This was caused by having no oil
Pilot was quoted as praising Southend ATC for spotting the smoke (seafront observer) and calling him in. He considered that he may well not have made it back had he continued to display.
The Lancaster had to have an engine change last night and may not fly today. The Hurricane blew a rad and is waiting for a replacement.
A Lynx came in on Saturday with a full engine failure emergency, closing the airport for 45 minutes. It was test run yesterday after repairs, but will be leaving by road.
The MH53 suffered a starter motor failure. That must be a BIG starter motor
Worst of all is the Hunter G-PSST. The Hunter was late yesterday and missed its slot, so did a few runs for the crowds at the airport, rather than its intended seafront display. On coming in to land, it came down wincingly heavily. So heavily in fact that it lost a substantial amount of metal from the back end. On further inspection, it is beyond economic repair and will never fly again
The Spitfire returned for an emergency landing, having no oil pressure. This was caused by having no oil
Pilot was quoted as praising Southend ATC for spotting the smoke (seafront observer) and calling him in. He considered that he may well not have made it back had he continued to display.The Lancaster had to have an engine change last night and may not fly today. The Hurricane blew a rad and is waiting for a replacement.
A Lynx came in on Saturday with a full engine failure emergency, closing the airport for 45 minutes. It was test run yesterday after repairs, but will be leaving by road.
The MH53 suffered a starter motor failure. That must be a BIG starter motor
Worst of all is the Hunter G-PSST. The Hunter was late yesterday and missed its slot, so did a few runs for the crowds at the airport, rather than its intended seafront display. On coming in to land, it came down wincingly heavily. So heavily in fact that it lost a substantial amount of metal from the back end. On further inspection, it is beyond economic repair and will never fly again
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: N51:37:39 W1:19:16 Feel free to use as a waypoint.
Thats the second time that Flapjack has scraped his tail down the runway (the first was at Belfast I think).
Whats the difference this time that makes it a W/O (a very quick decision BTW) surely one would ba able to do as last time and bolt another one on (if you can get one that is).
Bad luck for the others, hope its not too serious.
Whats the difference this time that makes it a W/O (a very quick decision BTW) surely one would ba able to do as last time and bolt another one on (if you can get one that is).
Bad luck for the others, hope its not too serious.
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: Enniskillen
Last time the Hunter hit its tail was Enniskillen (2001, I think) and it seemed quite bad, they flew home then though. It hit the tail before the wheels even touched, thats how high the nose was.
The scrape was in the runway for a long while after.
Tony
The scrape was in the runway for a long while after.
Tony
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: Essex, UK
When we saw the Hunter land, my mate said how it was unbelievable that an aircraft could take such a pounding. It was later that we found out it couldn't. Such a shame.
The Spitfire, Hurricane and MH53 didn't fly today, but a Mustang came along to help and the single running Lynx put on a stunning display.
Accepting that very little comes close to watching fast jets with re-heat on, ripping up the zone, I came away with the SU26 as my favourite.
Some of the time it was flying, some of the time it was just cartwheeling through the air. Some of the time it was horizontal but dropping with no real forward movement and some of the time it was going from forward to vertical, without gaining much height and then sitting there, hanging on the prop. Not a word I like to use, but nothing else describes it... Awesome
The Spitfire, Hurricane and MH53 didn't fly today, but a Mustang came along to help and the single running Lynx put on a stunning display.
Accepting that very little comes close to watching fast jets with re-heat on, ripping up the zone, I came away with the SU26 as my favourite.
Some of the time it was flying, some of the time it was just cartwheeling through the air. Some of the time it was horizontal but dropping with no real forward movement and some of the time it was going from forward to vertical, without gaining much height and then sitting there, hanging on the prop. Not a word I like to use, but nothing else describes it... Awesome
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: N51:37:39 W1:19:16 Feel free to use as a waypoint.
Still wondering how you can describe an aircraft as written off when the damage appears to be confined to a replaceable part of the airframe and its hasnt even been stripped down and inspected yet.
The tail is a write off (he appears to be collecting these) not sure about the rest of the airframe.
The tail is a write off (he appears to be collecting these) not sure about the rest of the airframe.
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Gone.........for good this time.
Ah yes M-O-T-F, but do you know what other damage lies beneath? A new jet pipe would cost quite a bit, and who knows whether the fuselage is distorted? Only Captain Flapjack can tell (or rather his insurance & maintenence companies)
Northern Monkey
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle, England
The BBMF DC3 flew past Topcliffe airfield at about 1000ft, just outside the matz at 2pm ish, and flew back in the other direction about 3 hours later, maybe it was collecting spitfire bits!!
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: N51:37:39 W1:19:16 Feel free to use as a waypoint.
Precisely my dear Zlin
However it is being called written off before the aircraft has been inspected. it may be a write off but equally it may not be.
I would not wat our dear Bar Shaker on a Jury at my (ficticious I may add) trial.
Time will tell.
However it is being called written off before the aircraft has been inspected. it may be a write off but equally it may not be.
I would not wat our dear Bar Shaker on a Jury at my (ficticious I may add) trial.
Time will tell.




