SafetyCom
Thread Starter

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: South of 65N
SafetyCom
I believe the CAA is consulting on the introduction of a common use frequency to be used at non radio airstrips for safety related circuit position reports. Does anyone have any further information on time scales and actual frequency?
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk
Safetycom has been worked up by the PFA, its is as described above and is said to be available for the start of the flying season.
So that should be soon......
The PFA chairman has said it is not a chat fequency so no chatting on it, you know like there is no chatting on the Micro frequency and there wasn't on 123.4 (now Notamed as not for chat) or 118.00
I think its a great idea and a victory for common sense.
The PFA kept it a secret as that's what they do but the end result is good.
I'm sure there will be some chat on it but if used sensibly it will be a great aid to many, apart from those who need to be hooked up to an agency for every flying minute of course.
So that should be soon......
The PFA chairman has said it is not a chat fequency so no chatting on it, you know like there is no chatting on the Micro frequency and there wasn't on 123.4 (now Notamed as not for chat) or 118.00
I think its a great idea and a victory for common sense.
The PFA kept it a secret as that's what they do but the end result is good.
I'm sure there will be some chat on it but if used sensibly it will be a great aid to many, apart from those who need to be hooked up to an agency for every flying minute of course.
Not so N, but still FG
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
From: London, UK
I used the microlight frequency once. It was non-stop chat and banter . Quite jolly, but I'm not sure of the safety value ("eh, Colin, is that you in the blue trike in front?"). The French unicom seems to work well, with little chatter.

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 73
From: Pewsey, UK
Excellent idea - as long as users don't "chat and banter", but allow its use for proper safety co-ordination, so much the better.
And one minor point of correction - isn't the "unofficial" frequency 123.45, cos I think Lyneham (123.40) would have noticed !
And one minor point of correction - isn't the "unofficial" frequency 123.45, cos I think Lyneham (123.40) would have noticed !




