Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Would you buy a Cessna Twin?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Would you buy a Cessna Twin?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd May 2004, 17:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Farnham
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would you buy a Cessna Twin?

I am thinking about a T310R, but am a little concerned about the aparently forthcoming AD on Cessna wing spars. It currenlty only applies to certain 400 series Cessnas, but rumour has it that it may well spread to all Cessna twins. With an estimated fix cost of $70000...yes thats right 430+ man hours, it is more than many of them are worth.

What will this do to the used Cessna twin market, and should I look at an alternative?

Anyone 'in the know' out there care to comment?

GG
Flyboy-F33 is offline  
Old 2nd May 2004, 17:53
  #2 (permalink)  

Sub Judice Angel Lovegod
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Read Geoffrey Boot's article in the current edition of Flyer about the Aztec. I love mine to bits.
Timothy is offline  
Old 2nd May 2004, 19:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: europe
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I too like my Aztec, but the more important consideration must be can you afford to take such a huge financial gamble, and without being impudent, I would think only a serious gambler would be even slightly tempted.
bluskis is offline  
Old 2nd May 2004, 19:14
  #4 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But.....you've gotta admit.........

If the 310 were a girl it'd be Cat Deeley.

If the Aztec were a girl it'd be Dawn French

NUFF SAID?
Monocock is offline  
Old 2nd May 2004, 20:15
  #5 (permalink)  

Sub Judice Angel Lovegod
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
monocock

You are so shallow. Beauty is skin deep. The ability to work and serve reliably, and provide comfort and safety, must be more important!

Timothy
Timothy is offline  
Old 2nd May 2004, 22:01
  #6 (permalink)  
High Flying Bird
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Old Sarum ish
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, Timothy... which aircraft would you compare to Moira Stewart?
AerBabe is offline  
Old 2nd May 2004, 22:13
  #7 (permalink)  

Sub Judice Angel Lovegod
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rearranging the letters of Moira Stewart gives 'A tart? I'm worse!'!
Timothy is offline  
Old 2nd May 2004, 22:17
  #8 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Time for the helmet AB......
Monocock is offline  
Old 2nd May 2004, 22:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Enniskillen
Age: 67
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would look at the Cessna 340, but I would wait until this spar thing is confirmed, there will be lots for sale at give away prices,

I am a bit fed up with the PA27, and there won't be much difference in running costs.
TonyR is offline  
Old 2nd May 2004, 22:52
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Farnham
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the comments....I dont recall anywhere in my question asking whether the Aztec is a better aircraft....uglier...certainly.
It, probably, is the at the bottom of my short-list
Flyboy-F33 is offline  
Old 2nd May 2004, 22:57
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Enniskillen
Age: 67
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look at the Cessna 303 as it is unlikely to be affected by the spar mod.

The 303 is also good out of 600 M of grass if you need to, not that fast though.

Why do you want a twin anyway??

Tony
TonyR is offline  
Old 2nd May 2004, 23:00
  #12 (permalink)  

Sub Judice Angel Lovegod
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK. Less subtly. The 310 is a lovely looking aircraft. It performs well, in terms of speed and range, on it's power.

However:[list=1][*]There is the spar problem hanging over its head[*]It's engines are said to be prone to cracked cylinders and even crankcases[*]It's load bearing and passenger cabin are rather limited[*]There have been a number of fatal crashes in the last couple of years[*]It requires careful handling after an engine failure especially at low speed[/list=1]

But it looks nice.



Timothy
Timothy is offline  
Old 3rd May 2004, 11:32
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've quite a few hours in the C402 and C310 (R and Q variants). I preferred the 402 to the 310 but I preferred both of those to the PA31 and PA34s that I also used to fly

Not that I am in the market but currently there is no way that I would contemplate buying any of the 400 series. I would only consider a 310 IF it was such a steal that I could afford to walk away from it IF the spar AD permeates down to the 300 series.

Shame really but most 310s/4xx must be at least 30 odd yrs old!

Stik
stiknruda is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.