how have you been shown a bad WX circuit?
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK East
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@ ASI, I see you're from cambridge..does that mean you learned to fly @ Marshalls Aerodrome?
Yea my first bad Wx circuit with my FI was fun. Did a straight in on Runway 05 grass stopped descent @ c.10ft
then climbed back up to about 5-600'. He didn't see the three helicopters hovering close by the runway and when he did he all but screamed like a girl (sorry ladies) and grabbed at the controls. I was coping well though methinks..
I think it's on the syllabus too. Its actually quite helpful if you get stuck out there under a descending cloud layer.
FFW
Yea my first bad Wx circuit with my FI was fun. Did a straight in on Runway 05 grass stopped descent @ c.10ft
then climbed back up to about 5-600'. He didn't see the three helicopters hovering close by the runway and when he did he all but screamed like a girl (sorry ladies) and grabbed at the controls. I was coping well though methinks..I think it's on the syllabus too. Its actually quite helpful if you get stuck out there under a descending cloud layer.
FFW
Not so N, but still FG
Join Date: May 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Certainly was shown them: both pretendy ones and real ones during the course, and had to do a real one on my first ever PPL trip with a passenger (what this tells you about my judgment in getting airborne that day you can deduce for yourselves) . On my revalidation check ride the other week my cheerful instructor said that he'd put his hands over my eyes if I went a whisker above 600 feet whilst we did a pretendy clag circuit. I did, he did, and the point was well made, although of course it's easier in real life if there's actual cloud in your hair.
PS: fudgy, bear in mind that if forced into doing a real one, you may not be doing the climb stage, but may be joining the circuit at low level and flying a tight downwind, with perhaps a constant aspect continuous turn to final.
PS: fudgy, bear in mind that if forced into doing a real one, you may not be doing the climb stage, but may be joining the circuit at low level and flying a tight downwind, with perhaps a constant aspect continuous turn to final.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think anybody who thinks a low level circuit is easy should try doing it under the conditions where one might actually have to do one, e.g. 3km visibility in heavy rain, turbulence, and just below an 800ft cloudbase, tops at 10000ft (or no instrument/IMC rating) with 1500ft terrain nearby, and the icing level at 1000ft 
Not so N, but still FG
Join Date: May 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Been there, done that, ate the chocolates, got the t-shirt, IO. I'm not saying it's easy, but it is perversely enjoyable and satisfying precisely because it requires maximum focus. Risk does so concentrate the mind, don't you find?
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
500'
...... or as your height dictates!
My instructor did mention that some students only manage low level circuits on their precautionary landing lesson as controlled aerodromes are sometimes reluctant to let you do them. We were lucky this week in that we were the only ones around, and even then we had to join crosswind for another runway before being given permission from ATC to carry out 3 touch and go's.
Worth doing. Feel it was a very valuable lesson.
...... or as your height dictates!
My instructor did mention that some students only manage low level circuits on their precautionary landing lesson as controlled aerodromes are sometimes reluctant to let you do them. We were lucky this week in that we were the only ones around, and even then we had to join crosswind for another runway before being given permission from ATC to carry out 3 touch and go's.
Worth doing. Feel it was a very valuable lesson.
Why do it if it's not fun?
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fudgy,
Please don't try this out yourself. Get your instructor to show you. Although the descriptions that you've read in this thread are pretty accurate, I don't like the idea of a student trying out a low-level manoeuvre without appropriate guidance from an instructor.....
FFF
--------------
Please don't try this out yourself. Get your instructor to show you. Although the descriptions that you've read in this thread are pretty accurate, I don't like the idea of a student trying out a low-level manoeuvre without appropriate guidance from an instructor.....
FFF
--------------
High Flying Bird
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Old Sarum ish
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shown them during my PPL and first lesson of tailwheel conversion was done in low cloud. That really made things busy!
Especially interesting was having to orbit at not many hundred feet on final to let a couple of gliders land.
Especially interesting was having to orbit at not many hundred feet on final to let a couple of gliders land.
I was not taught them, nor tested on them second time around. First time round I did them in a Tiger Moth and hated approaching at 45 kts with power and the nose in the air - hard to check descent rate and when to chop the power, no flare needed. I never had the confidence to do that solo after my GFT.
I did my GFT on a frosty morning and, when I taxied back to take off again, I could see where the tail skid had touched down - impressively close to the downwind hedge!!!
I did my GFT on a frosty morning and, when I taxied back to take off again, I could see where the tail skid had touched down - impressively close to the downwind hedge!!!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FNG
No, I prefer to eliminate risk as far as possible. And minimise pilot workload while I am at it; the two are closely related.
Risk does so concentrate the mind, don't you find?
Not so N, but still FG
Join Date: May 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Perhaps these are different modes of expressing the same concept. Controlling and managing risk is to me one of the attractions of flying, as with other sports which entail dangers more considerable than tennis elbow. I read an article about risk sports the other days which suggested than those who are by character disposed to participate in such sports are no more tolerant of danger and risk than those who are not so disposed, but seek to mimimise risk by improving their skills.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK East
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks ASI, just realised you put Cambridgeshire (I must learn to read), just like me. Course I don't live anywhere near Cambridge..
To be honest, I vaguely remember a certain 'somebody' going out on his orientation exercises and doing a few extreme maneuvers just to see what the aircraft would do
Needless to say, instructors weren't happy when I told them my findings. (Don't worry FFF, I'd already done the training and they did say I could practice emergencies.. 
) I'm sure I'm not the only one?? Although nowadays that 'somebody' is a lot more sensible.
FFW
To be honest, I vaguely remember a certain 'somebody' going out on his orientation exercises and doing a few extreme maneuvers just to see what the aircraft would do
Needless to say, instructors weren't happy when I told them my findings. (Don't worry FFF, I'd already done the training and they did say I could practice emergencies.. ) I'm sure I'm not the only one?? Although nowadays that 'somebody' is a lot more sensible.FFW