Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Ooops, missed that call...!

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Ooops, missed that call...!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th September 2003 | 14:33
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: UK
I'm surprised at some of the responses above! Why call for a service and then turn the volume down. Doesn't make sense to me. To the ATCO types that have responded above, is it possible, or even advisable, to request an alerting service if that is all the pilot is after? At least that would remove you from the requirments of a FIS.

D
Dufwer is offline  
Old 16th September 2003 | 14:58
  #22 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
I would just say "apologies" and leave it at that. Happens to all.

However the original post mentioned an FIS and not e.g. an RIS. An FIS is possibly worth very little at best when it comes to alerting to traffic which might come within a light year or two within you anyway.

An RIS is wholly different, and often a controller with a radar will give you an "FIS" due to workload (especially if you are "VFR") but in reality he's got on on the screen and will tell you if you are about to get close to something.

So, I often just maintain a listening watch on known-non-radar services, e.g. London Info but if I was getting an FIS from Thames Radar then I would be 100% with them, no exceptions.
IO540 is offline  
Old 16th September 2003 | 16:09
  #23 (permalink)  

The Original Whirly
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 4,327
Likes: 2
From: Belper, Derbyshire, UK
Reading between the lines, does some of this happen because PPL students are told they MUST use the radio? So once qualified they ask for an FIS, then turn down the volume?

You don't have to do this; there are alternatives. You can switch your radio off and not talk to anyone, if that's what you want to do. If you just think it might be nice to be able to call someone in an emergency, you can tune into a frequency and turn down the volume - London Info, D & D, the nearest big airfield, whatever you like - so that in the event of engine failure or similar you don't have to twiddle any knobs to get out a Mayday. Or you can maintain a listening watch, which means you listen in and might hear useful things about the traffic in your area...unless of course they're all doing the same thing.

I'm not saying any of the above are sensible. But you CAN do them. You don't HAVE to get an FIS from London Info just because way back your instructor said you did.
Whirlybird is offline  
Old 16th September 2003 | 16:17
  #24 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
Agree entirely... PPL students are taught to talk to London Info etc etc and most of the time it' s a waste of time because (apart from flight plan foreign trips) almost nobody else talks to them.

If maintaining a listening watch for emergency purposes, why not 121.5? I believe there is guaranteed coverage over the entire mainland over something like 3000ft, and 2000ft in the London TMA region... in practice the system works much lower down. I have also seen airliners (pre-9/11) having the cockpit speaker set to a radio tuned to 121.5 - then you get 100-200nm range
IO540 is offline  
Old 16th September 2003 | 16:21
  #25 (permalink)  

 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: London
How about, "London Info, G-XX readability 2"
Rupert S is offline  
Old 16th September 2003 | 16:28
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: UK
I only ever advise people to switch to London Information if i know they will be crossing an area where there is absolutely no other coverage, if they require an Airways joining clearance further along their route or they are en-route to another country.
Listening out to the local airfields frequency is of much more use.
I like one of the ideas raised by the Fly on track team of wearing a specific squawk that indicates you are listening out to the airfields frequency but do not want a service. This allows ATC to contact you in an emergency and lets us know you are maintaining a listening watch.
Eira is offline  
Old 16th September 2003 | 16:50
  #27 (permalink)  

Northern Monkey
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle, England
I cant understand why anyone would turn the volume down on their radio so they cant hear it, you can talk over a radio transmission on an aircraft intercom, aslong as you listen out to the callsign at the beginning.

However, i often find that listening to others can give you information on the position of other vfr traffic, that you havent been alerted to, because the atc is busy. You would miss out on this if you turned your radio down, so why do it?

NB
NinjaBill is offline  
Old 16th September 2003 | 19:14
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Far East
Interesting replies, thanks. I didn't intend for this to become a London info discusion. Infact I was on Maston radar and going to France so in my case I had no option other option.

I do have a small confesion to make though. A few years back when I was very low on hours / experience, I was flying a C150 and receiving an FIS. At the time, I was nearing the end of what was at the time my longest and most demanding flight, and my pax was asking me where a certain landmark was. Suddenly, I heard my callsign followed by a frantic call and at the same instant my pax pointed out, with a surprising lack of surprise, a bloody great military sea king in my 10 o'clock, very close, same level, heading left to right across my track, entering a very steep desending turn. I didn't quite have to take evasive action, but it was obvious we would have come extremely close or even hit if the sea king hadn't turned. Due to our relative positions, the sea king had been obscured by the port wing on my C150 as we closed.

In short, the military pilot filed an airprox against me, but months later, 'blame' (Airpox reports tend to avoid the word blame, and in any case, who care whose fault it was if you actually have a mid air) was actually directed towards him, since he was undergoing IFR instruction in open FIR and had failed to keep a sufficient look out for his student.

Nevertheless, the incident shook me up, and taught me a few things. Small things that ar wrong with the planes we fly can take up large ammounts of our concentration. I had a slipping throtle (friction nut knackered) and the radios were terrible. These factors combined with flying in an new area at the end of a long flight with a demanding pax all added up.

This is what prompted me to start this thread because I was dissapointed with myself for having missed another traffic call under FIS. At the end of the day though the most important thing is - How good is your lookout?
Dude~ is offline  
Old 16th September 2003 | 19:39
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: UK
One of the members at the club has a feature within the radio installation on his aircraft so he can play back the last few transmissions received.
RodgerF is offline  
Old 16th September 2003 | 19:50
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
From: Dublin
Now, a radio that could identify your call sign and flash a big red light when it heard it, would be even better
dublinpilot is offline  
Old 16th September 2003 | 22:08
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: What????
I'd only end up missing the bloody light
Beet
Beethoven is offline  
Old 16th September 2003 | 22:50
  #32 (permalink)  

Why do it if it's not fun?
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,782
Likes: 12
From: Bournemouth
Or a radio which beeps at you when you get a message so you can turn the volume up.

Oh, hold on - airliners already have that. It's called Selcal!

FFF
------------
FlyingForFun is offline  
Old 17th September 2003 | 11:28
  #33 (permalink)  

I'matightbastard
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Dublin, great idea though I think it should be a green light.
Onan the Clumsy is offline  
Old 17th September 2003 | 19:55
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Chessington, UK
a bloody great military sea king in my 10 o'clock, very close, same level, heading left to right across my track
So in fact you were "on the right, in the right", and were maintaining course and speed as the rules of the air demand. I'm not surprised the airprox assigned the "blame" to him!
dmjw01 is offline  
Old 18th September 2003 | 15:33
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
From: UK
I always found carrying an irrascible old instructor to beat me furiously around the head at missed calls helped tremendously.
witchdoctor is offline  
Old 18th September 2003 | 21:32
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: England
TRY TELLING EM YOU WERE TOO BUSY WITH YOUR AEROBATIC DETAIL, THAT'LL CONFUSE EM IF YOUR IN A SPAM CAN!
Davidt is offline  
Old 18th September 2003 | 21:58
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
From: Dublin
Aeros in a spam can would definately keep you very busy!
dublinpilot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.