PAI:PAX storm into first class at 35,000ft (MERGED)
|
PAI:PAX storm into first class at 35,000ft
Taken from a posting on www.flyertalk.com - source of article unknown.
14 ARRESTED AFTER ECONOMY PASSENGERS STORM FIRST CLASS By Pat Hurst, PA. Angry economy passengers stormed first class on an international flight in a mid-air upgrading mutiny, it was disclosed today. The pilot of the packed Pakistan International Airlines jet radioed ahead, and 14 people were arrested on suspicion of endangering the aircraft after landing at Manchester Airport. Cabin crew lost control after the flight was delayed for four hours in searing heat on the tarmac at Islamabad airport in Pakistan. With economy packed, a number of passengers decided to upgrade themselves to the empty luxury section at the front of the Boeing 747. It is believed the crew asked them to move but they refused, so police were called in as the plane landed in the UK on Friday morning. A spokesman for Greater Manchester Police said: "Police at Manchester Airport were alerted to a problem on an incoming PIA flight from Pakistan. "Several passengers were reported to be trying to enter the first class area of the plane. "When the plane landed, 14 of the passengers were arrested on suspicion of endangering an aircraft in flight. "They have all been bailed until the end of June, pending further inquiries." A spokesman for the airline refused to comment. A duty manager at Manchester Airport confirmed there had been an incident but had no further details. |
PAI:PAX storm into first class at 35,000ft
Just heard on the news that passengers on a Pakinstan International Airlines flight heading for Manchester stormed into first class from economy, when they saw that this section was almost empty. This happened while in cruise, the captain informed the local authorities;resulting in many arrests when the aircraft dock.
I think the aircraft was a 747-300 series, form either islamabad or Kirachi(please correct if wrong) this was heard on Century FM, if anyone has any more please post below... cheers scott waterworth |
A spokesman for the airline said: “There were no problems. Everything was fine.” |
I have heard of cases similar where individual passengers have done this on flights in the past, and the crew have asked the pax to move and pax have refused, so crew carried on and just served them like all other first pax. They radioed ahead for the Police to meet a/c, and on arrival gave the pax a choice - either pay the fare difference or be arrested.
:ok: |
Originally Posted by bealine
Taken from a posting on www.flyertalk.com - source of article unknown.
The pilot of the packed Pakistan International Airlines jet radioed ahead, and 14 people were arrested on suspicion of endangering the aircraft after landing at Manchester Airport. |
i dont no which side to take on this, the passengers have paid for a certain level of service, so they shouldnt be unhappy when cabin crew refuses entery to first.
On the other hand, economy was full as described in the above article, so to relieve some stress not only on the crew but to the passengers it would be a sensible move to upgrade some passengers to first, thus making more room in ecomony. Another question i would like to ask... Are cabin crews assigned to certain sections of the aircraft, if this is the case then crews in first would have been underworked?so would it have made sense to move some passengers into first, but to stay on the same food as ecomony? I think that the passengers should of asked first, istead of storming, but we've all been in the situation on planes where its hot and stuffy, its easy to get annoyed! i'de like thoughts on this please thanks scott waterworth |
Are cabin crews assigned to certain sections of the aircraft if this is the case then crews in first would have been underworked Perhaps some one could explain to a mere ground hog, how people moving from economy class to first class could endanger an aircraft? surley there must be a more appropriate charge? :confused: :confused: If PIA let these passengers get away with their self-upgrade, what is to stop pax on another flight doing the same thing? You have to have pax sitting in their assigned seats as load sheets for cargo & baggage would be worked out according to where the pax were supposed to be sitting. And let's say worse case scenario, there was a hull loss, pax records would show Mr Smith in say 26F but if he had 'upgraded' himself to 10A then the families may not possibly know what happened to their loved one if the seat from 26F survived but the seat from 10A was BBQ'd :uhoh: |
Getoutofmygalley, thanks for clearing things up, i suppose that would make sense, only crewing for what it needed, or else airlines would be even more in debt
cheers scott |
|
I also don't see how these people could be accused of endangering the aircraft for changing their class of seat (assuming that's all they did) Maybe they could be charged with deception in the same way as someone who buys a second class ticket on a train who then moves to 1st and refuses to pay the extra.
Despite what Getoutofmygalley says not every instruction from cabin crew can be automatically construed as legal order from the commander of the aircraft, this is especially true if someone were being prosecuted for endangering the aircraft because they moved to a different seat and then refused to return to their correctly assigned seat after the 'order' was issued. We all know that cabin crew don't give a damn about PAX changing seats as long as it's within the same class. Any first year lawyer would be able to successfully argue this if his client were accused of endangering an aircraft because he changed seats. Obviously I'm not condoning what these PAX did nor am I even suggesting that anyone should even consider ignoring a request to do something from a member of the cabin crew, I normally work on the assumption that if they tell me to do something then it's for a good reason and I'll do it because they know what they're doing and they know an awful lot more about aircraft than I do. |
Story (almost exactly repeated as above) is at BBC News:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/m...er/4980364.stm Jordan |
My guess is that the term 'endangering' the a/c was used as it is a sure fire way to arrest them. What the pax were attempting (and apparently achieved) was to steal seating space from the airline but that might have been difficult to use as a term to get the Police on board. Getting them arrested at destination (and publicising this back home) was vital to dissuade others from trying this on.
|
May I suggest this could be a PR disaster for PIA if any of the 14 are acquitted by a Mcr jury of 'endangering an aircraft in flight'
The UK media are calling it an 'upgrade mutiny' In Joe Publics eye a mutiny is the takeover of a craft against lawful authority eg The Bounty. According to reports, no attempt was made to enter the flight deck - terrorism? 'Stealing' an upgrade? More space & better seats Ok but there would only be enough meals for those with appropriate class tickets. The cabin crew could have identified those entitled to free alcohol etc. The PIA website shows international route 747-300 have 45 business/economy plus seats and 388 in economy The pax were held in the a/c at Islamabad for 4 hr in the heat before departure, fraying tempers. In the US I suggest a number of pax (not nec the vociferous ones) would have been offered a free seat upgrade to even the pressure - and avoid lawsuits. First class pax could have been moved upstairs since I doubt PIA use it for a cocktail lounge. I await the trial outcome with interest |
Many times i have flown various airlines nd it seems
that the Cabin crew keep either the bus class or 1st class closed if no pax ...thus means they all can sit down and have a good chin wag not suprised other pax caused a stink .Trhe cabin crew should have offered the extra seeting to those ff pax they know who flys regular from the PIL from ground stadd
|
What an awesome concept, buy a cheap economy seat and then force your way into Business class!! They should name them, shame them, make them pay their own legal fees and then ban them from the airline!
If they have a complaint against the airline, they should have taken it up through the proper channels after landing! Mutt |
Originally Posted by lorddee
Many times i have flown various airlines and it seems
that the Cabin crew keep either the bus class or 1st class closed if no pax ...thus means they all can sit down and have a good chin wag not suprised other pax caused a stink .Trhe cabin crew should have offered the extra seeting to those ff pax they know who flys regular from the PIL from ground stadd If no pax buy a ticket for business class or first class, then why should the economy pax automatically be given a seat in business or first? It doesn't happen on a train so why should it on an aircraft? And you are making a huge assumption that the cabin crew don't offer upgrades just so that they can have a chin wag! When the cabin crew have finished the appropriate level of service, for that particular moment in the flight, why shouldn't they have a cup of coffee and a chat? Cabin Crew are human too and need to have a break :* |
I choose......
On the other hand, economy was full as described in the above article, so to relieve some stress not only on the crew but to the passengers it would be a sensible move to upgrade some passengers to first, thus making more room in ecomony. |
First, discreetly identify Airline Frequent Flyer members otherwise
Single adults seated next to young children/family group 3rd trimesster pregnant women, - saves moving them later in the flight when contractions start OAPs with mobility problems - on safety grounds benefits from extra leg room Anyone with an inside leg >34 in - extra leg room Anyone over 200 lbs - more seat space Airline shareholders All would appreciate the extra consideration Snorers, & fa*ters - optional Once the flight has closed, flight income and costs are fixed. I suppose you could hold a mid-air auction for spare first class seats...... but all that is on offer is more space, less noise and a different movie. I do not suggest free class upgrades on every flight, but if economy is full then the PR value costs nothing, and even those left in econ will appreciate reduction in stress. I have yet to see an econ pax mutiny just for an upgrade Trains are somewhat different. A ticket does not guarantee a seat but Sir Peter Parker ex BR chairman said everyone was entitled. Anyone without a seat would likely suffer more injury in an accident so it becomes a Health & Safety / Compensation Issue On Virgin Lon-Mcr there are often 6 1st class & 6 standard carriages if 2nd class is full the central 1st class carriage is re-designated. Even then there are plenty of available seats in First. On one trip the 0715 arrived before the 0655 and everyone boarded Fights developed over seat reservations and a few of us migrated to First. When the Ticket Inspector explained we were not entitled we said 'tell us where there is a 2nd class seat and we will move' No response. That is what I call a 'discretionary response to circumstance' |
Nov 71 I'm sure that you are well aware that
but all that is on offer is more space, less noise and a different movie. if economy is full then the PR value costs nothing Trains are somewhat different. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:44. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.