Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

LHR to LER

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st September 2022 | 19:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 105
From: London
LHR to LER

LHR to. LER
So, we have New York Kennedy, JFK, Washington Dulles, IAD, Warsaw Chopin , WAW, etc. so how about LHR to LER , London Elizabeth ?
RetiredBA/BY is online now  
Reply
Old 21st September 2022 | 19:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,691
Likes: 24
From: Blighty
London and Heathrow are famous or infamous enough not to need advertising under an alternate brand. Furthermore, it's best to name something new - it's much more difficult to rebadge something old under a new name and get people to switch names.

Airports are inevitably quite grim and functional when you pass through them on a regular basis. When debate turns (eventually) to R3 or T6, or the airport has an operational meltdown, do you really want the Queen's name drawn through the muck raking and recriminations ?
Regardless of that, Leinster airport in Australia already uses the LER IATA code

Perhaps something more cheerful and uplifting ? Prince Albert, the husband of Queen Victoria, was memorialised in the Royal Albert Hall.... a place most Brits associate with something fun and enjoyable

Last edited by davidjohnson6; 21st September 2022 at 19:50.
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st September 2022 | 20:09
  #3 (permalink)  
V_2
20 Countries Visited
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 222
Likes: 73
From: UK
Well LHR Terminal 2 “Queens terminal” is named after….

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...r_Elizabeth_II

quite a list.
V_2 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st September 2022 | 21:17
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 112
From: There and here
Wasn't T2 (new) so named because of the previous Queens Buildings that were atop and astride the old T2 ? Whatever, it's nice that QEII has a mention. In other news, in Paris, Metro station 'Georges V' along the Champs Elysees was renamed Elizabeth II during the day of the funeral, which I thought was a nice touch from the RATP. Chapeau!
SpringHeeledJack is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd September 2022 | 06:39
  #5 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,699
Likes: 2,041
From: Reading, UK
Originally Posted by SpringHeeledJack
Wasn't T2 (new) so named because of the previous Queens Buildings that were atop and astride the old T2 ? Whatever, it's nice that QEII has a mention.
The Queens Building (singular) was one of Gibberd's original CTA structures situated between the Europa Building (later T2) and the space where T1 would later be built.

It was indeed named after HM, who opened it in 1955.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd September 2022 | 08:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 484
From: A place in the sun
Airports are such ghastly places these days, I am sure that re-naming or naming one after Her Majesty would have been the last thing she would have wanted. Please think of something better.
Bergerie1 is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd September 2022 | 10:28
  #7 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 273
Likes: 5
From: Ireland
She has enough named after her. Including an entire terminal at Heathrow and a new rail line to the airport. Time to move on.
alserire is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd September 2022 | 17:43
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 165
From: se england
No more Elizabeth anythings please.
We are supposed to be British. we
Keep calm and carry on

and follow the line that

the King is dead long live the king.

Give Charles a chance , and looked at in the really cold light of day Was she all that?? I mean our non existent constitution prevented her from doing almost anything meaningful . She got a State Funeral, no a argument with that but it really is over
pax britanica is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd September 2022 | 18:23
  #9 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
20 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,842
Likes: 328
From: Hertfordshire, UK.
I thought that renaming CrossRail [2 syllables and states what it is] to The Elizabeth Line [6 syllables of no relevance] was stupid and very 'needy'. HMQ did her bit as she always did but, as has been said, there was a frenzy of using her name in the last couple of years.

Heathrow is 2 syllables and is known far and wide on the globe. It is synonymous with London Airport and anyone wanting to travel to/via the UK will know it is the main gateway.
PAXboy is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd September 2022 | 23:06
  #10 (permalink)  
Son of Slot
Super Senior Moderator
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 615
From: London
When the main Johannesburg airport was renamed O.R. Tambo International, they did not change the IATA 'JNB' but the ICAO did change. Beijing airport is still PEK.
S.o.S. is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2022 | 08:36
  #11 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,221
Likes: 1,649
From: Ferrara
"renaming CrossRail [2 syllables and states what it is] to The Elizabeth Line [6 syllables of no relevance] was stupid"

and I never saw her on either the Tube of on the Paddington to Slough/Windsor trains either...............
Asturias56 is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2022 | 06:49
  #12 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 881
Likes: 67
From: UK
QE2 Airport

Seems from Google that someone has already mentioned about a new London Airport name concept - LQE
London Queen Elizabeth II International Airport

or London QE2 Airport has a nicer ring about it.

I think she deserves all the recognition - HM was formative in LHR History, by opening all the original CTA buildings and the Tower - none of which survived building progress.
We have the new Queens Terminal (T2) so why not...
rog747 is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2022 | 07:27
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 112
From: There and here
....or how about LCY London City renamed ?
SpringHeeledJack is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2022 | 10:59
  #14 (permalink)  
USER0005
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Symbolic perhaps, but useful, no. Does anyone fly to "John Lennon Airport" or "George Best Airport"? No they fly to Liverpool and Belfast City. To rebadge LHR would simply result in more corporate expense for very little gain. Would anyone choose "Queen Elizabeth II Airport" over Gatwick because of some kind of allegiance to our former Monarch, albeit that she was globally known and respected? No, they'd fly to the most convenient and / or cheapest from their perspective.

When commercial aviation was novel airports got named after famous people such as JFK, but these days people are more interested in where they fly to, not what what the place is named, that's why places like Elmdon, Woolsington, Yeadon, Ringway etc have been consigned to the memories of old farts like us.

 
Reply
Old 25th September 2022 | 11:49
  #15 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 881
Likes: 67
From: UK
Oh shame ! I think QE2 airport is very snazzy lol
rog747 is offline  
Reply
Old 28th September 2022 | 07:03
  #16 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,221
Likes: 1,649
From: Ferrara
Oddly people DO occasionally use the official name for some airports - CGD, & JFK come to mind - but generally it's because it's shorter/easier to say/easier to spell than the other name.
Asturias56 is offline  
Reply
Old 28th September 2022 | 08:05
  #17 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,699
Likes: 2,041
From: Reading, UK
Originally Posted by Asturias56
Oddly people DO occasionally use the official name for some airports - CGD, & JFK come to mind - but generally it's because it's shorter/easier to say/easier to spell than the other name.
In those two instances, where the city in question has two or more major airports, it avoids confusion.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.