Ryan Air leaving baggage behind on some flight?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: US/EU
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ryan Air leaving baggage behind on some flight?
A couple days ago one of the local English-language publications here posted this article claiming the Ryan Air flights from Budapest the Majorca were departing without passengers' checked baggage, a result, it claims, of overweight conditions created by the carry-on luggage policy.
Ryanair Outrage at Budapest Airport
Then, yesterday, another article indicates the Hungarian government has launched some kind of legal procedure against the airline as a result of these baggage issues.
Budapaest Government Launches Procedure Against Ryanair
Is this yet another unintended consequence of the new carry-on rules that went into effect in January, perhaps made worse by the heavier volume of seasonal travel now?
Ryanair Outrage at Budapest Airport
Then, yesterday, another article indicates the Hungarian government has launched some kind of legal procedure against the airline as a result of these baggage issues.
Budapaest Government Launches Procedure Against Ryanair
Is this yet another unintended consequence of the new carry-on rules that went into effect in January, perhaps made worse by the heavier volume of seasonal travel now?
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Either the back of a sim, or wherever Crewing send me.
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Is this yet another unintended consequence of the new carry-on rules that went into effect in January, perhaps made worse by the heavier volume of seasonal travel now?
Was this just one flight, or numerous? If it was one flight then perhaps there was some restriction in the hold that meant it wasn't usable???
But they weren't going to Palma, they were going to Las Palmas (Gran Canaria). That's more than twice as far.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Either the back of a sim, or wherever Crewing send me.
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
But they weren't going to Palma, they were going to Las Palmas (Gran Canaria)
A couple days ago one of the local English-language publications here posted this article claiming the Ryan Air flights from Budapest the Majorca
Click on the link in the first post:
"Last week, Ryanair had to inform passengers at Las Palmas that unfortunately, the plane failed to carry their luggage to the destination: while they were travelling to the Canary Islands, their luggage was left in Hungary."
Ryanair don't fly from BUD to PMI.
Mark in CA is a long way away, so we can excuse the Palma/Las Palmas confusion.
See my reply above.
As far as I'm aware, RYR don't use the 79t MTOW on the B738.
"Last week, Ryanair had to inform passengers at Las Palmas that unfortunately, the plane failed to carry their luggage to the destination: while they were travelling to the Canary Islands, their luggage was left in Hungary."
Ryanair don't fly from BUD to PMI.
Mark in CA is a long way away, so we can excuse the Palma/Las Palmas confusion.
Whether they were going from BUD to PMI or LPA they should still be able to get away with a full load of passengers, luggage and enough fuel to make it there and 1/2 way back.
As far as I'm aware, RYR don't use the 79t MTOW on the B738.
A by no means unknown situation, and nothing to do with what is described above, but more prevalent on carriers with short turnrounds and/or crews scheduled to the hilt. Were the bags deliberately left off to save time getting ready for departure from Budapest. This is commonly concealed by blaming it on incompetence by the baggage loaders, where in practice it is a carrier decision to depart before the bags (or some of them) are loaded. Pax are never told.
Hopefully at least a scribbled update to the loadsheet. Complain to the Irish CAA and ask them to pull the Ryanair loadsheet for the flight in question.
Hopefully at least a scribbled update to the loadsheet. Complain to the Irish CAA and ask them to pull the Ryanair loadsheet for the flight in question.
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: NQY
Age: 35
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Depending on aircraft MTOW will be either 74990 or 77990. I think some are also 71990 but will check fleet weights when I get back to work.
RTOWs also of 66990 and 69990. Gate bags/Free Gate Bags/whatever you want to call them, they are trim adjustment only up to the first 100. Thereafter must be included using standard hold luggage weight. You can fit about 150-160 bags in the front (varied hold and FGBs) and 30ish in H1. Same for the back. On a full flight with about 80 hold luggage pieces ZFW is around 59tonnes. Assuming mostly adults.
RTOWs also of 66990 and 69990. Gate bags/Free Gate Bags/whatever you want to call them, they are trim adjustment only up to the first 100. Thereafter must be included using standard hold luggage weight. You can fit about 150-160 bags in the front (varied hold and FGBs) and 30ish in H1. Same for the back. On a full flight with about 80 hold luggage pieces ZFW is around 59tonnes. Assuming mostly adults.
Last edited by Scinfaxi; 26th Jul 2018 at 19:52. Reason: Extra info
PPRuNe Handmaiden
I am not a Ryanair employee but it's possible they have reduced the MGTOW to reduce airways charges. It's a reasonably common practice amongst airlines. Whilst it's a paper exercise, you can't ignore that limit and fuel above it. Only downside is that if you use one of these aircraft on a route that is long, then you can get caught out. I wouldn't mind this is what happened. A bit unfortunate but other airlines have fallen foul of their own cost savings too.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: US/EU
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
does seem ludicrous that a 738 even with 189 pax and bags would be WAT or MTOW limited on BUD-LPA however if the then hold loaded extra cabin baggage was phenomenal then perhaps....or if he was tankering fuel - no idea but all sounds a farce rather
at BMA we limited our 3 refurbished 707-320C's in 1982 to lower MTOW's on paper to use them on IT charters to the Med (so did Condor with their DC10's)
afaik we did not get caught out except on to be mindful on tankering fuel to save time down route with ATC delays or any fuel supply issues
i think we reduced the MTOW from 151000 kgs to 115000 kgs to save on landing fees
at BMA we limited our 3 refurbished 707-320C's in 1982 to lower MTOW's on paper to use them on IT charters to the Med (so did Condor with their DC10's)
afaik we did not get caught out except on to be mindful on tankering fuel to save time down route with ATC delays or any fuel supply issues
i think we reduced the MTOW from 151000 kgs to 115000 kgs to save on landing fees