Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Norwegian new seats 16.8 inches wide!?!?!

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Norwegian new seats 16.8 inches wide!?!?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jul 2018, 09:29
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,536
Received 49 Likes on 31 Posts
These extra narrow seats are bulkhead seats which have extra legroom and are normally sold at a premium price. The regular seats are slightly wider but have reduced legroom so either way you lose, but personally I would prefer the extra legroom and easier access.
krismiler is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2018, 12:11
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,818
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by underfire


Delta seat widths per ac...https://www.delta.com/content/www/en_US/traveling-with-us/airports-and-aircraft/Aircraft/boeing-737-900er-739.htmlI
You must also check where the measurement is from. Some use center of armrest to center, others use distance between armrests
I think it's pretty universal to quote "seat width" as the measurement between the inside faces of the armrests, as per B ("pax width") in the diagram.

The distance between the centres of the armrests, somewhat disingenuously described in the diagram as "hip clearance" (typically 2 inches more than B for a Y seat) only becomes relevant if you're having an armrest war with the passenger next to you.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2018, 20:47
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is something that puzzles me about these seat dimensions. Let's assume, for discussion, the spacing between the insides of the armrests is 16.8 in. So, 16.8 x pi = 52.8 in, which means that a spherical or cylindrical shape of that circumference would just fit, but barely. The central portion of my torso isn't exactly spherical or cylindrical, but even being a bit overweight, it is nowhere near 52.8 in, circumference. (My waist size in 38 in., and my hips measure 43 in. I am a male, 5ft-11in, 190 lb.)
Gilmorrie is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2018, 17:10
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Mars
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gilmorrie
There is something that puzzles me about these seat dimensions. Let's assume, for discussion, the spacing between the insides of the armrests is 16.8 in. So, 16.8 x pi = 52.8 in, which means that a spherical or cylindrical shape of that circumference would just fit, but barely. The central portion of my torso isn't exactly spherical or cylindrical, but even being a bit overweight, it is nowhere near 52.8 in, circumference. (My waist size in 38 in., and my hips measure 43 in. I am a male, 5ft-11in, 190 lb.)
And your body at your waist or hips is probably at least three times as wide as it is deep.

If we assume that exact ratio we can model the cross-section of your hips as a rectangle of width 3x and depth 1x, with a total perimeter of 8x. If we shove in the figure for your hips we get 43" / 8x = means x = 5.375. Width is 3x so 5.375 x 3 = 16.125". Congratulations, you fit.
Lascaille is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.