A hole in the security cheese?
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: BRS/GVA
A hole in the security cheese?
So, I took a flight as PAX yesterday from Belgrade to Frankfurt. Busy a/c all seats filled, usual shortage of overhead locker space.
Just as boarding was complete, and as our slot time passes there was something going on a few rows ahead. CC had called up a pax from the rear to look/talk with the pax in front. After some time they announced that the pax was ill and an ambulance had been called.
Said pax was removed and his hold luggage removed. The CC then set about looking for his carry-on, but only a few rows either side of where he had been sat. They asked only these few rows to identify their bags.
Now only a few minutes earlier people had been going right up and down the plane looking for stowage spots.
This strikes me as a hole in the system. A vector that could be exploited.
I did spend the rest of the flight a tad worried when i would hear the B of the Bang. It did seem a bit suspicious to fall sick just after boarding, but before the doors were closed.
Comments...
Just as boarding was complete, and as our slot time passes there was something going on a few rows ahead. CC had called up a pax from the rear to look/talk with the pax in front. After some time they announced that the pax was ill and an ambulance had been called.
Said pax was removed and his hold luggage removed. The CC then set about looking for his carry-on, but only a few rows either side of where he had been sat. They asked only these few rows to identify their bags.
Now only a few minutes earlier people had been going right up and down the plane looking for stowage spots.
This strikes me as a hole in the system. A vector that could be exploited.
I did spend the rest of the flight a tad worried when i would hear the B of the Bang. It did seem a bit suspicious to fall sick just after boarding, but before the doors were closed.
Comments...
Last edited by hoss183; 10th May 2016 at 12:18.
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: BRS/GVA
Yes carry-on is screened. But if that's the ONLY line of defence, then the cheese is only 1 hole thick. Introduce a lazy or compromised screener and the hole appears.
As SP said, there should have been a cabin wide recognition really.
As SP said, there should have been a cabin wide recognition really.
Guest
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
From: On the Beach
hoss183:
If you want belts and suspenders in all aspects of airline security, I suggest a different mode of transportation for your peace of mind.
Yes carry-on is screened. But if that's the ONLY line of defence, then the cheese is only 1 hole thick. Introduce a lazy or compromised screener and the hole appears.
As SP said, there should have been a cabin wide recognition really.
As SP said, there should have been a cabin wide recognition really.
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
Likes: 3
From: london
My understanding in the UK. If a pap leaves the flight on the ground at anytime for any reason the whole aircraft has to be disembarked and a "security sweep" of the cabin carried out regardless of any bags or not.
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: La Napoule
The actions taken by the crew in the OP's post are standard procedure and DFT approved in at least one very large European LoCo.
You'll never satisfy everyone so please can we just leave the info' trail alone now.
You'll never satisfy everyone so please can we just leave the info' trail alone now.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Continental Europe
The most comprehensive way would be for everyone to disembark, do a full security search, then reboard everyone... maybe 40 mins or so for short haul, an hour or so for long haul... Offloading someone for illness or scared of flying or drunk is fairly common to be honest so the current procedures seem fine in normal circumstances unless there is sufficient reason by the captain to do a full cabin search
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Continental Europe
JW are you saying longer or quicker? I'm usually optimistic but say it takes 10 mins to organise busses or terminal holding area and ground staff, about 15 mins to disembark, 10 mins to security search, 25 mins to reboard (plus or minus 10 if you're re-checking boarding cards/passports or not). I'm sure in reality everything usually takes longer than hoped.
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
hoss183
Mate, the "security cheese" as you describe it has more holes in it than a colander! There are countless ways to get "items" onboard aircraft.
You can thank your lucky stars that most "items" smuggled onto aircraft these days are in powder form and are for human consumption.
It really isn't that suspicious for people to "fall sick" just after boarding an aircraft, disembarking sick (or other reason) people is just another day at the office. Even in the Dash-8 I personally do it around every 3-6 months.
DIVOSH!
Mate, the "security cheese" as you describe it has more holes in it than a colander! There are countless ways to get "items" onboard aircraft.
You can thank your lucky stars that most "items" smuggled onto aircraft these days are in powder form and are for human consumption.
It really isn't that suspicious for people to "fall sick" just after boarding an aircraft, disembarking sick (or other reason) people is just another day at the office. Even in the Dash-8 I personally do it around every 3-6 months.
DIVOSH!
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: Cheshire, UK
I did spend the rest of the flight a tad worried when i would hear the B of the Bang. It did seem a bit suspicious to fall sick just after boarding, but before the doors were closed.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: uk
EK 007 DXB-LHR last week. Emirates had to offload a passenger with some some medical condition - we were still at the gate, just before pushing back. It was a pretty full A380 and the Captain optimistically suggested a 30 minute delay - it was 1hr 45mins.
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: BRS/GVA
Thanks for moving the thread here. Its hardly a pax issue, it something that affects crew and the application of SOPs. The intention was to get feedback on that from crew and to make people think about this vector.