A hole in the security cheese?
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for moving the thread here. Its hardly a pax issue, it something that affects crew and the application of SOPs. The intention was to get feedback on that from crew and to make people think about this vector.
It is a pax issue, it was caused by a pax which then impacted other pax, crew and the airline. Why should it not be moved here. Crew forum members should check not only their forum but this one, after all the pax are the ones paying their wages.
Baggage reconciliation (hold or cabin) assumes that people are unwilling to die for their cause. Sadly that does not appear to be the case any longer and whilst we definitely require effective screening I wonder if the concept is still valid.
The US has never adopted baggage reconciliation for domestic flights (which I forgot when I volunteered to be bumped & my bag went to my destination) and relies on screening.
The US has never adopted baggage reconciliation for domestic flights (which I forgot when I volunteered to be bumped & my bag went to my destination) and relies on screening.
TBH just caught up with this thread - I get the impression the OP thinks they have stumbled upon something new and TBH I'm not sure why.
This "vector", if you choose to call it that, has been discussed at nauseam mainly behind closed doors, and companies may well have detailed SOPs to cover it.
..and above all Peter47 is right when you've got people who are willing to die for their cause then you require effective physical screening.
This "vector", if you choose to call it that, has been discussed at nauseam mainly behind closed doors, and companies may well have detailed SOPs to cover it.
..and above all Peter47 is right when you've got people who are willing to die for their cause then you require effective physical screening.
