Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

KL 875 - drone catches fire in overhead locker!

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

KL 875 - drone catches fire in overhead locker!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 12:51
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: south of Cirencester, north of Lyneham
Age: 76
Posts: 1,267
Received 20 Likes on 9 Posts
I was told that pacemakers in bulk are considered 'hazardous cargo'. The energy delivery ability of their batteries is small, though - a few milliamps at most, purposely in case it goes wrong. Back some 30+ years ago, there were some plutonium powered pacemakers and thus the 'hazardous cargo' designation, even though such pacemakers haven't been made since the early 1980s.
radeng is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 21:04
  #22 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
The energy in a single pacemaker battery is still significant. If any person who has a pacemaker is (post mortem) to be cremated - the pacemaker has to be removed beforehand.

The battery can explode inside the cremation chamber with such force that it can damage the firebricks. And this is not a joke. Every funeral director will ask the question of the family when cremation is specified.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 05:28
  #23 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 831
Received 34 Likes on 19 Posts
A lot of drones use Li-Po batteries.They pack in a large charge in a small space for weight saving,and they are more dangerous than Li-ion batteries.

The results of shorting out a charged Li-Po battery are pretty spectacular.
Plenty of videos online showing the results.
TWT is online now  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 10:44
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by radeng
I was told that pacemakers in bulk are considered 'hazardous cargo'. The energy delivery ability of their batteries is small, though - a few milliamps at most, purposely in case it goes wrong. Back some 30+ years ago, there were some plutonium powered pacemakers and thus the 'hazardous cargo' designation, even though such pacemakers haven't been made since the early 1980s.
I'm sure the IATA Dangerous Goods Manual would distinguish between radioactive and non-radioactive versions. I don't have a copy to hand but I would doubt that an entire product range would bear the designation of the most dangerous iteration.
ExXB is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.