Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

proof of being a passenger on delayed flight

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

proof of being a passenger on delayed flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Apr 2015, 23:41
  #41 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
esa-aardvark Your story point towards needing to set your mobile (cell) phone to 'record' before approaching the counter staff.

One of the routines I've had is:

"Speak to the agent at the destination, they will have all the information"
"Oh no. Only the agent at the origination has that information."

and variations on that theme.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2015, 03:54
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: moraira,spain-Norfolk, UK
Age: 82
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Paxboy,
good advice indeed !
esa-aardvark is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2015, 09:59
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indeed. One thing I discovered a long time ago is to never trust anything said, or promises made, by a check-in agent.
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2015, 12:22
  #44 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
In fairness to agents and counter staff, we have discussed in here before the problem that staff are not given the power to right wrongs. In previous decades, staff had the authority to issue vouchers or whatever. After the financial recession of 1990/92 the accountants took over and cut all that away.

Therefore, fobbing us off is all they can do. Not least as we now demand more and the big problem that many pax do not understand the Ts&Cs of LCCs. So it is a horrible twist of factors.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2015, 15:56
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PAXboy, true of course. Also in earlier days most ground staff were employed directly by the airline rather than a handling agent. If it was staff from a handling agent there were generally one or two of the airline's own representatives on hand. And, as you rightly say, they had a great deal of autonomy back in those days. Now days I have found that many check-in staff are hired for the Summer peak and are basically trained as robots to the extent that when I approach the check-in desk with passport in hand, opened to the photo page, and extended towards them, the agents greet me with, "May I see your passport Sir"!
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2015, 08:25
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We should recall that the drafters of Regulation 261 did NOT consider it appropriate to include compensation for delays in the Regulation. The idea was debated with the consensus being that MOST delays were not the same as a cancellation (or a denied boarding).

It was the ECJ that ruled thatt SOME delays COULD BE as bad as a cancellation and it was unfair that IN THESE CASES compensation wasn't payable.

One case involved a 24 hour delay where passengers were actually accommodated on the airline's next daily flight. The original flight was never 'cancelled', by it never operated either.

I understand the Parliament has redrafted 261 to take into account the ECJs various rulings. However it is frozen until two governments withdraw their objections to one clause referring to Gibraltar. I'm sure glad we have adults in Brussels.
ExXB is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2015, 21:39
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: lancs.UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My daughter recently was delayed 4 hours, Manchester-Holland (Schiphol?)
She claimed the statutory compensation and , afaik, it was the Orange Airline paid her promptly and courteously.
The delay caused all sorts of problems in Holland and during the sprint for a train/tram ,she encountered a colleague who was also similarly inconvenienced. Luckily, they both had a good working knowledge of the Public Transport Timetables and were, ~ midnight, able to reach their destinations in a timely manner.
Most posters have overlooked the TIME COST to the Pax.
In Daughter's case she values her leisure-time highly, she prefers an on-schedule transport to compensation for an unscheduled disruption of her social life.


Why moan , if this jacks up fares, it will get rid of the scummy-grockle end of the trade, premium fares for the elite will again prevail and Flight Crews will once more have a lucrative and well-paid career.....unfortunately, there will be a lot less of them needed....As with most things, the lower the price, the larger the number who can afford.
If an airline is properly organised, this legislation should not harm it. I haven't heard about the canny Irishman filing for bankruptcy, have you?
cockney steve is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2015, 00:17
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was stuck on the M25 earlier today for over an hour due to road traffic collision involving 4 vehicles which caused a 2 lane closure and long tail backs.

Please can I claim for compensation for my time, for my wasted fuel, for my bruised ego and whatever other stress I may (or may not) have encountered?

Why is it airlines that get penalised by such regulations, I would very much like to send my compensation claim into the Highways Agency or Department for Transport for today's inconvenience because I am sure it could have been avoided or at least reduced if police stopped middle lane drivers, if the driving test included motorway driving, if the Department of Transport raised the speed limit to 80mph... The list goes on, maybe I should claim this with the European Courts too?

Sometimes happens, no one is at overall or total fault, therefore no one can be held 100% accountable. Yet with airlines it is always totally their fault.
T250 is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2015, 05:59
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by T250
Yet with airlines it is always totally their fault.
Not True! When it isn't their fault, weather; ATC strike; runway closure; etc, nobody pays.

Cockney Steve, if you daughter's flight was delayed because of ATC, don't you think her TIME COST loss would have been the same? So, why shouldn't she be paid in those circumstances.

Airlines DO NOT guarantee their schedules and, in contract law, it does not form part of the contract with the passenger.

Just out of curiosity, what percentage of the total ticket cost was the compensation. I'm guessing it was much more ...
ExXB is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2015, 10:08
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T250, if you want to take that route, which would have been YOUR choice incidentally, than yes you could technically apply for compensation by suing the person responsible for causing the accident

A few years back a flight the family and I were on was cancelled. The airline re-routed us and we ensued a delay of 5 hours. When we were being re-ticketed the airline representative voluntarily gave us an EU261 Regulation brochure and said we could claim. So I thought, why not. Got the usual standard denial of responsibility from the airline, which niggled me and motivated me further to prove that they were telling big fibs in their explanation. I received my compensation. Original fare totaled €560 and I received €1000 compensation. Their representative pointed the way and I followed the legal procedure. Did I feel guilty? The answer is a resounding NO!
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2015, 10:56
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: lancs.UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The whole idea of Punitive Damages, is, I thought, to dissuade the transgressor.
In th past, some operators have deliberately overbooked and used devious means to "get off the hook"...The draconian penalties mean the operators will have to leave a bit more of a buffer in their operation.
On a personal level, I disagree with the punitive aspect. compensation, yes.
Had there been more honesty and transparency and less sharp practice in "the race to the bottom" this legislation would have been superfluous.
They have been hoist with their own petard and dragged the decent operators with them..
cockney steve is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2015, 13:53
  #52 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
cockney steve You describe almost the entire gamut of human life. Unfortunately, the ones still getting away with it include politicians, house builders and others. You can fill in the usual suspects ...
PAXboy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.