Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Security on flights to USA stepped up

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Security on flights to USA stepped up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th July 2014 | 20:01
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
From: Confoederatio Helvetica
I read somewhere that the new LHR terminal 2 isn't fit for the new at security measures. Anyone been through there to n. America, who can comment.
ExXB is offline  
Reply
Old 20th July 2014 | 20:28
  #22 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 477
Likes: 4
From: Herts, UK
I don't think a public forum is the sort of place to analyse specifics around this, but suffice to say that many terminals worldwide were built with no plan for gate screening. You adapt and make it work though, indeed you have to or you don't operate.
Laarbruch72 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st July 2014 | 06:10
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
From: Confoederatio Helvetica
OK, it'll take it to the Telegraph, where I read it first. Nobody reads that, do they?
ExXB is offline  
Reply
Old 21st July 2014 | 17:06
  #24 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 477
Likes: 4
From: Herts, UK
No, the paper printed an unconfirmed story, and now you're asking people to publicly verify or comment further, so not the same thing. I'm merely suggesting that discussion on the effectiveness or otherwise of specific measures at specific airports is not to be encouraged anywhere, whether in a newspaper article or not. And your reply was tantamount to kids justifying their thoughtless behaviour by crying "but the bigger boy did it first". It still doesn't mean it's a good idea.
Laarbruch72 is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd July 2014 | 17:25
  #25 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 92
From: south of Cirencester, north of Lyneham
I couldn't decide from the published info if medical devices were exempt. Things such as insulin pumps and neuro-stimulators, which tend to work automatically and have no manual controls. In any case, not sure how you could prove the insulin pump was working without special test gear, and you would not wish to give the user an extra dose of insulin only to have him go into a glycaemic reaction 800 miles out.......

Although I always liked the 'switch off all electronic devices for take off and landing'. Can't always be done - pacemakers, for example, and turning off a hearing aid would be very dangerous. Obviously not thought about by those who wrote the briefing script.....
radeng is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd July 2014 | 21:47
  #26 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 477
Likes: 4
From: Herts, UK
No device is necessarily exempt, but it's accepted that some medical devices clearly have to be examined and screened differently.

Your comment about electrical items on take off and landing is probably best dealt with on an SEP thread, it's a bit outside the scope of this discussion.
Laarbruch72 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th August 2014 | 11:22
  #27 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 440
Likes: 5
From: Hampshire
ExXB,

passed through T2 at LHR to Chicago on 20th July - my camera bag was checked / swabbed but I was not asked to turn any of the electrics on (phone / tablet etc)
paulc is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.