ESTA Query
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Waikickamoocow NZ
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ESTA Query
Am flying LHR to Auckland via Vancouver next month, my Travel Agent has advised getting an ESTA visa for the US of A 'just in case of diversion', does anybody think this is worthwhile or just a waste of money ?.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Assuming you are on the non-stop NZ flight YVR-AKL I see no reason why you would need ESTA. Even in the unlikely event the flight was diverted to a US airport, they have procedures in place to deal with such situations.
Does your agent charge a fee for this 'service'? Perhaps you need another agent.
Oh, if your flight has a scheduled stop at a US point you would need ESTA, even if you aren't stopping. You will be required to pass US immigration. (This happened to us when we flew NAN-YVR on FJ which stopped at HNL) But I don't think anybody offers Canada-SW Pacific flights with a US stop.
Does your agent charge a fee for this 'service'? Perhaps you need another agent.
Oh, if your flight has a scheduled stop at a US point you would need ESTA, even if you aren't stopping. You will be required to pass US immigration. (This happened to us when we flew NAN-YVR on FJ which stopped at HNL) But I don't think anybody offers Canada-SW Pacific flights with a US stop.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Geneva
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I also don't think it's necessary - is there a story behind the agent's recommendation? A previous client got delayed or stuck somehow?
On the other hand, since an ESTA only costs $14, takes a few minutes to obtain online, and is valid for two years, if there's any chance you'll be visiting the US in the coming months, you might as well get it now. Be sure to go to the official site: https://esta.cbp.dhs.gov/esta/
On the other hand, since an ESTA only costs $14, takes a few minutes to obtain online, and is valid for two years, if there's any chance you'll be visiting the US in the coming months, you might as well get it now. Be sure to go to the official site: https://esta.cbp.dhs.gov/esta/
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Literally 10s of thousands of passengers transit US airspace every day without need for an ESTA. Every flight from Europe to Caribbean, Mexico, C. America, from Canada to the Pacific, Mexico, C. and S. America, domestic Canada, etc.
Not saying the airlines don't provide pax names to US authorities, but ESTA and no-fly list are different things.
Not saying the airlines don't provide pax names to US authorities, but ESTA and no-fly list are different things.
Está servira para distraerle.
An electronic ESTA costs a statutory $14. What is the doubt? You'll never need it but were you to do so for whatever reason, you'll wish you'd spend the Ł8.33.
It's the price of a cup of coffee at Heathrow while you wait to board your long and very expensive flight. False economy is a phrase that springs to mind.
One means to say, you might crash in the Pacific and be washed up upon western American shores. If the natives don't catch and cook you or hold you as a sex slave, you'll wish you had the proper paperwork to prove you're not a wetback or an agent of Godzilla's enemy Mothra and the Masuras; Godzilla being a good guy and having the freedom of San Francisco which makes him a gay blade indeed.
It's the price of a cup of coffee at Heathrow while you wait to board your long and very expensive flight. False economy is a phrase that springs to mind.
One means to say, you might crash in the Pacific and be washed up upon western American shores. If the natives don't catch and cook you or hold you as a sex slave, you'll wish you had the proper paperwork to prove you're not a wetback or an agent of Godzilla's enemy Mothra and the Masuras; Godzilla being a good guy and having the freedom of San Francisco which makes him a gay blade indeed.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Greater Aldergrove
Age: 53
Posts: 851
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any hotel address works.
To the OP, if you are not on a flight to the US, then you don't need an ESTA. Don't worry about a diversion...otherwise frequent fliers would need visas for every country on the face of the globe...just in case! Think your Travel Agent is being a bit melodramatic...
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As you have to put the Flight number into the ESTA you are opening another potential can of worms
"Why did you state in an official US Govt document that this AC flight is going to the USA when it isn't? Are you planning to hi-jack it? Why put "in transit" when you won't be doing this??"
Best leave off IMHO
"Why did you state in an official US Govt document that this AC flight is going to the USA when it isn't? Are you planning to hi-jack it? Why put "in transit" when you won't be doing this??"
Best leave off IMHO
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Geneva
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm always impressed how complete ignorance is no barrier to posting advice here, even when the truth can be found in seconds with a few mouse-clicks.
From the ESTA help page:
From the ESTA help page:
Can prospective travelers apply to ESTA for a travel authorization without specific travel plans if they want to be able to travel to the United States on short notice?
Visa Waiver Program travelers are not required to have specific plans to travel to the United States before they apply for a travel authorization. If a traveler’s destination address in the United States is unknown when he or she completes the application in ESTA for the travel authorization, the traveler should enter the name of the hotel or approximate location he or she intends to visit. Travelers may update this information when their plans are finalized, but they will not be required to update their destination addresses or itineraries should they change after their travel authorization has been approved. DHS recommends that applications for travel authorization be submitted in ESTA as early as possible, as soon as, or even before travel is planned. ESTA will accept applications from last minute and emergency travelers – those Visa Waiver Program travelers that arrive at the airport without an approved ESTA.
Visa Waiver Program travelers are not required to have specific plans to travel to the United States before they apply for a travel authorization. If a traveler’s destination address in the United States is unknown when he or she completes the application in ESTA for the travel authorization, the traveler should enter the name of the hotel or approximate location he or she intends to visit. Travelers may update this information when their plans are finalized, but they will not be required to update their destination addresses or itineraries should they change after their travel authorization has been approved. DHS recommends that applications for travel authorization be submitted in ESTA as early as possible, as soon as, or even before travel is planned. ESTA will accept applications from last minute and emergency travelers – those Visa Waiver Program travelers that arrive at the airport without an approved ESTA.
Está servira para distraerle.
A $14 ESTA effectively acts as a multiple entry visa.
The US is full of Irish in uniform. The Irish know all about Murphy's Law and are not sympathetic to those who, while travelling in their neck of the woods, have not taken basic precautions to make everyone's life easy. You can enter the USA unofficially with temporary permission with an ESTA. The thing has power.
It is a useful five minute exercise to complete for the price of a six pack of Root Beer. Especially when you know that the diversion for CYVR will most likely be KSEA. If you're worried about declaring a hotel, you could always enter Double Tree Hilton, Seattle Airport?/TBA and the date of your intended landing in Vancouver. It does get very foggy up there sometimes. You'd enjoy the bus ride between the two airfields.
Do let us know what you decide to do and what happens if you don't were circumstances to dictate that you should have.
The US is full of Irish in uniform. The Irish know all about Murphy's Law and are not sympathetic to those who, while travelling in their neck of the woods, have not taken basic precautions to make everyone's life easy. You can enter the USA unofficially with temporary permission with an ESTA. The thing has power.
It is a useful five minute exercise to complete for the price of a six pack of Root Beer. Especially when you know that the diversion for CYVR will most likely be KSEA. If you're worried about declaring a hotel, you could always enter Double Tree Hilton, Seattle Airport?/TBA and the date of your intended landing in Vancouver. It does get very foggy up there sometimes. You'd enjoy the bus ride between the two airfields.
Do let us know what you decide to do and what happens if you don't were circumstances to dictate that you should have.
As Cheetah says, the ESTA basically acts as a pre-screened multi-entry short term visa. All it effectively does is get your personal details to Homeland Security to check if you are on a no-fly list or have other potential issues that might "interest" them & disbar you from entry.
My last ESTA has now expired, but when I renewed it, I used my usual flight details [EDI-EWR on CO] and my usual hotel in the woodlands, Houston.
Haven't actually stayed at that hotel since & my first entry on the ESTA was LHR-IAH, no updates ever done to original ESTA details.
My last ESTA has now expired, but when I renewed it, I used my usual flight details [EDI-EWR on CO] and my usual hotel in the woodlands, Houston.
Haven't actually stayed at that hotel since & my first entry on the ESTA was LHR-IAH, no updates ever done to original ESTA details.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Come on now …
An ESTA is NOT REQUIRED (sorry for shouting) if you are not travelling to or via a US airport. You will need one if travelling LON-AKL on NZ's through flight which stops at LAX, you do not need one flying LON-AKL on connecting flights via YVR.
An ESTA is NOT REQUIRED (ditto) if your flight transits US airspace without landing.You do not need one travelling YVR-AKL on NZ.
You do not need an ESTA just 'in case' your flight to/from Canada might be diverted to the US. Most diversions will be to another Canadian airport in any case.
If you were to request an ESTA when you don't need one, it might be considered suspicious. (testing the system, perhaps?) Doing so may require you to be 'economical with the truth' something you should never do with immigration authorities. That might come back to haunt you in the future.
Save the $14 and buy yourself a beer, or two, at YVR.
An ESTA is NOT REQUIRED (sorry for shouting) if you are not travelling to or via a US airport. You will need one if travelling LON-AKL on NZ's through flight which stops at LAX, you do not need one flying LON-AKL on connecting flights via YVR.
An ESTA is NOT REQUIRED (ditto) if your flight transits US airspace without landing.You do not need one travelling YVR-AKL on NZ.
You do not need an ESTA just 'in case' your flight to/from Canada might be diverted to the US. Most diversions will be to another Canadian airport in any case.
If you were to request an ESTA when you don't need one, it might be considered suspicious. (testing the system, perhaps?) Doing so may require you to be 'economical with the truth' something you should never do with immigration authorities. That might come back to haunt you in the future.
Save the $14 and buy yourself a beer, or two, at YVR.
ExXB
Agreed. ....IMHO the advice given to the OP is slightly silly.....you could extend the travel agent's "just in case" argument to every passenger having to obtain Visas for every country overflown en route on any flight, in case of a diversion for technical or medical reasons.....(done that)...
Diverting across political boundaries can be a real PITA (especially if your signature is on the Gen Decs and the countries aren't the best of friends....done that as well ) but most countries have a work around.
Agreed. ....IMHO the advice given to the OP is slightly silly.....you could extend the travel agent's "just in case" argument to every passenger having to obtain Visas for every country overflown en route on any flight, in case of a diversion for technical or medical reasons.....(done that)...
Diverting across political boundaries can be a real PITA (especially if your signature is on the Gen Decs and the countries aren't the best of friends....done that as well ) but most countries have a work around.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Waikickamoocow NZ
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many thanks for the replies, much appreciated, the consensus seems to be that if the LHR - YVR flight diverts to a US airport then the authorities would have a planeload of pax without ESTA landing in their laps and have contingencies in place to handle it ?.
Está servira para distraerle.
There are few contingencies for the innocent from Homeland. You'd possibly spend the night in the holding tank steaming up the undergrowth on a hot summer night before being plane loaded out the next day. Spring the $14 and stay in the Hilton at the airline's expense or suffer the uncontrolled urges of the Seattle mosquitoes with no Boeing tour thrown in as compensation? Who knows and who can say?
Of course the other correspondents are quite correct. Your aircraft will never divert and anyway, by extension of that argument, you'd need a Russian visa to fly from London to Peking. Common sense dictates that you do nothing. Prudence and precaution might suggest a different path since the way is paved with so few thorns.
Edited to correct the most appalling error of grammar which had absolutely and accidentally slipped in. Just like the fog in Vancouver.
Of course the other correspondents are quite correct. Your aircraft will never divert and anyway, by extension of that argument, you'd need a Russian visa to fly from London to Peking. Common sense dictates that you do nothing. Prudence and precaution might suggest a different path since the way is paved with so few thorns.
Edited to correct the most appalling error of grammar which had absolutely and accidentally slipped in. Just like the fog in Vancouver.
Last edited by cavortingcheetah; 18th May 2014 at 22:35.
In a word, yes, a contingency will be in place, most likely keeping you all quarantined airside until you can move on to your intended destination. In the balance though the chances of your particular flight diverting are slim as a slim thing that's been on a diet. However, if the weather forecast is such that a diversion does become a likelihood a day or so ahead of your travel date, and you feel uncomfortable, then do as Cheetah suggests and speculate the fourteen bucks.
Last edited by Donkey497; 18th May 2014 at 22:07. Reason: cheetah beat me to it.....