Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

BA vs Virgin - across the pond in cattle...

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

BA vs Virgin - across the pond in cattle...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Sep 2013, 15:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Henley-on-Thames, UK
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA vs Virgin - across the pond in cattle...

Apologies if this one's been done to death lately - I haven't been lurking around here for a while...

I'm headed over the pond in early November - LHR to LAX and back from SFO and wondered what the BA vs Virgin experience was like down the back in either cattle or cattle plus, aka economy and premuim economy - is there any different between the 2 airlines for the same cabin class? Aircraft type and flight times seem pretty similar, as do the costs, so is there anything more to think about than headline price?

I have an Avios/Exec Club card with BA, but it's hardly used, so I don't think it'll yield an upgrade or the likes. I'm going away with my g/f, who has already booked with Virgin in economy, but she's happy for us to travel seperately so I could be alone - and anyway, unless we upgraded to premuim economy, even if we were sitting together, there's likely to be a 3rd seat in the row... I'm not that tall, so don't 'need' extra leg room or an exit row (although it's always nice...) and don't have any special dietary requirements.

Any thoughts appreciated!
yellowperil is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 17:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South of France
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The last time I flew that route was about 18 months ago - and when I did it, I was in PE with VS for a blokes biking holiday so I was slightly numbed if you know what I mean...
However, I have flown many times with both in a number of classes. Basically, it's 6 points for BA and half a dozen for VS. The seats and cabins are going to be much the same really so it's service, attitude etc. Food/wine similar, maybe some more choc-ices on VS. My way of looking at it is that BA are the BBC of flying and VS the MTV.
Sorry I can't be more help than that but have a nice time anyway
strake is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 17:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry for the slight drift, but I wish that people would stop going on and on about cattle class. Everyone should know that cattle are protected by EU regulation and must be given adequate room to lie down and turn around, they must be adequately fed and given liquids to their needs.

You'd be lucky to be treated as well as cattle are.

Last edited by ExXB; 17th Sep 2013 at 17:08.
ExXB is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 17:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK. East Mids.
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Much of a muchness I believe.

Although, maybe if you could book the BA A380, which starts LAX next week, then it might make for a slightly nicer environment for the outbound flight.
Tray Surfer is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 18:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: london
Age: 66
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having travelled both VS and BA economy and premium economy, both the same economy tight for space, uncomfortable seats, service variable to non existent but ok to get from A to B if you're not too fussed. Premium economy on the other hand VS every time, better seat better cabin and service, BA on the other hand the only difference is the curtain separating you from the economy cabin everything else the same even worse premium gets served after economy so you may not get a choice of meal.
chiswick is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 18:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK. East Mids.
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
chiswick, I am not sure which flight you were on, but WT+ is never served after WT. Purely from a logistical side of how the service is delivered onboard. It is either it's own separate cabin on some of the 747 aircraft, or it is served first at the front of the forward cabin of the other type of 747, or the 777 and 767.

Also, there are several product differences, so I can only take it that it has been some time since you flew in the cabin.
Tray Surfer is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 22:05
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Potomac Heights
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yellow: Please, please take my advice. If your girlfriend has already booked on VS, follow suit. From very long personal experience (with girlfriends and wife), you will never hear the end of it should you voluntarily decide to travel separately. Assuming that the VS fare is even remotely similar to BA's, that is by far the wiser choice. Sometimes personal preference for different airlines just has to take a back seat.

Note, only once I did fly separately from my wife. It was agreed to only because I was traveling on business and my ticket had been purchased by the company -- while her's was out of our personal funds and it could be had at far less cost on a different airline. But guess what, my flight went out on time, but her's was delayed and she missed a connection and had to spend the night in Cleveland. So even though she had agreed to the arrangement, I have not heard the end of it.
SeenItAll is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 01:11
  #8 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
SeenItAll has it right! It is far better to endure delays together.

I recall years ago travelling to NYC in Upper Class and (then) Mrs PB riding in Y, for the same reason. She was mollified by being able to ride into Manhattan in the Limo. Doubly good, that night it was a Stretch! Whew.
PAXboy is online now  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 08:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air New Zealand? (Just saying....)
TightSlot is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 08:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 2,715
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
The new NZ Premium Econ will knock spots off the others (although the pods mean you actually sit slightly facing away from each other). Of the other two, VS purple leather is better.
Wycombe is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 08:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South of France
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd never thought about that option before - in fact, I didn't know it existed.

The Sky-couch thing looks rather clever. Much like a proper version of what economy flying used to be like 'back-in-the-day' when aircraft flew well under optimum passenger numbers and you could normally stretch out in Y .

I'd give it a go.
strake is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 09:11
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I concurr with the above advice - travel together if you can...

But if you decide to try the BA A380 to LAX, make sure you don't get a K window seat in economy - I travelled downstairs in a K seat to FRA on one of the proving flights, and the IFE box, combined with the curvature of the fuselage basically meant that there was very little foot space left... These IFE boxes seem to be even larger than the VS ones....
deep_south is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 09:13
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SeenItAll

Getting wife stranded in Cleveland! Wonderful! How did you manage that again?
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 11:41
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: munich
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn't Virgin fly the A340 on that route which arranges the window seats in pairs as opposed to the blocks of three on the BA 747 (or 380). Just a thought, if you want to hold hands without anyone watching...
praa is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 12:40
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lemonia. Best Greek in the world
Posts: 1,759
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
1. Rule 1 of every flight you ever take. Be nice to everyone "serving" you, no matter how horrible they might be to you. Even Security. Especially Security.

2. Travel together. If you do not, sod's law will apply. And, as someone has already said, you will not hear the end of it until she dumps you.

3. There is no difference in quality between their basic product. The service on both varies wildly.
Ancient Observer is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 14:54
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Potomac Heights
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Getting wife stranded in Cleveland! Wonderful! How did you manage that again?
A strange turn of events. Travel was from Chicago to Washington, DC. I was booked nonstop on United (at a high fare). Wife was booked on Continental that required a connection in Cleveland (to get a really low fare). Summer late afternoon in the US midwest -- which means thunderstorms. Wife's plane was to take off shortly before mine -- but didn't board due to a ground stop at O'Hare. Because they expected the ground stop to be lengthy, flight crew then either took off into the terminal to seek sustenance or were reassigned to a different flight -- I can't remember which. Long story short, ground stop turned out to be brief, my plane leaves in good order, no crew immediately available for wife's plane. By the time the crew is located (or a new crew procured), there are huge residual delays in O'Hare takeoffs. Thus, flight arrives late in Cleveland, and last flight for DC has left.

But as a happy ending, because wife's flight to Cleveland was delayed because of crew unavailability, and not because of weather, she was put up at the airport Marriott for the night on Continental's purse.
SeenItAll is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 17:23
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK. East Mids.
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
praa,

BA A380 offers a 2-4-2 configuration in the upper deck in World Traveller and a 2-3-2 configuration in World Traveller Plus.
Tray Surfer is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 17:53
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
think the main difference is on the ground - you can occasionally get some awful treatment from BA - slightly less likely with Virgin
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 18:10
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally I would much prefer to fly with Virgin than BA long haul.

But, like other posters had said, if your girlfriend has already booked with Virgin, then it's an absolute no-brainer to get yourself on the same flights. Virgin sometimes uses the A340 on the LAX route, which is a 2-4-2 seat configuration in economy, so should be quite easy to get a row for just you and the girlfriend.
jackieofalltrades is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2013, 18:52
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I've not flown VS recently myself but from what I've heard from others they have a more familiar 'matey' style, BA is a bit classier. It will depend upon personal preference, many like the VS approach others prefer that of BA. You can go on the Skytrax airline quality website - I suspect that a major criteria for posting is having had a poor experience - but you can pick up some general trends. BA is slightly ahead (6/10 average against 5/10).
Peter47 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.